Visualizing Knowledge in Project-Based Work

This article considers how visual practices are used to manage knowledge in project-based work. It compares project-based work in a capital goods manufacturer and an architectural firm. Visual representations are used extensively in both cases, but the nature of visual practice differs significantly between the two. The research explores the kinds of knowledge that are (and aren't) developed and made visible in strategizing and planning activities. For example, whereas the emphasis of project-based work in the former firm is on exploitation of knowledge and it visualizes its project context largely in commercial and processual terms, the emphasis in the latter is on exploration and it uses a wide range of visual materials to understand physical interdependencies across the project boundary. We contend particular kinds of visual tools can help project teams step between exploration and exploitation within a project, and articulate the types of representations, foci of attention and patterns of interaction involved. The findings suggest that business managers can make more deliberate choices about how knowledge is made visible, and can change visual practice to align the project with exploring and exploiting opportunities. It raises the question: What don't you see within your organization? The work contributes to academic debates about managing through projects, strategising and organizing, while the focus on visual representation disrupts the tacit-codified dichotomy in the broad debate on knowledge and learning, and highlights the craft skills central to strategizing and organizing.

[1]  J. Whyte,et al.  Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects' , 2009 .

[2]  Yiannis Gabriel Storytelling In Organizations , 2000 .

[3]  Martin J. Eppler A Comparison between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[4]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Beth A. Bechky Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Victor Margolin,et al.  The idea of design , 1995 .

[7]  Mitsuru Kodama Knowledge creation through networked strategic communities: Case studies on new product development in Japanese companies , 2005 .

[8]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Organising Knowledge Management and Dissemination in New Product Development: Lessons from 12 Global Corporations , 2006 .

[9]  S. Newell,et al.  The Processes of Project-based Learning , 2004 .

[10]  S. D. N. Cook,et al.  Culture and Organizational Learning , 1993 .

[11]  K. K. Cetina Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[12]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[13]  Philip Hancock,et al.  Uncovering the Semiotic in Organizational Aesthetics , 2005 .

[14]  R CarlilePaul A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[15]  Pasquale Gagliardi,et al.  Exploring the Aesthetic Side of Organizational Life , 1999 .

[16]  Gernot Grabher Temporary Architectures of Learning: Knowledge Governance in Project Ecologies , 2004 .

[17]  Ian McLoughlin,et al.  Sensemaking as a process within complex projects , 2003 .

[18]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Editorial: Visual practices and the built environment , 2007 .

[19]  Frans van den Bosch,et al.  Mastering Strategic Renewal: Mobilising Renewal Journeys in Multi-unit Firms , 2001 .

[20]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Building Project Capabilities: From Exploratory to Exploitative Learning , 2004 .

[21]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Developments in design methodology , 1984 .

[22]  D. Yanow Seeing Organizational Learning: A `Cultural' View , 2000 .

[23]  M. Graham Integrating Design and Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[24]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[25]  A. Salter,et al.  Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects , 2004 .

[26]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Practices of Strategising/Organising: Broadening Strategy Work and Skills , 2006 .

[27]  S. Newell,et al.  Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[28]  S. Floyd,et al.  Searching, Processing, Codifying and Practicing – Key Learning Activities in Exploratory Initiatives , 2007 .

[29]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Episodic Innovation: R&D Strategies for Project‐Based Environments , 2005 .

[30]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[31]  M. Engwall No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[32]  J. Whyte,et al.  Visual representations as ‘artefacts of knowing’ , 2007 .

[33]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the 'Codification' of Knowledge? , 2000 .

[34]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Beyond Words: Aesthetic Knowledge and Knowing in Organizations , 2007 .

[35]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .

[36]  Antonio Strati,et al.  Organization and Aesthetics , 1999 .

[37]  Frank Blackler,et al.  On the Life of the Object , 2005 .

[38]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .

[39]  Dov Dvir,et al.  Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success , 2004 .

[40]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[41]  Michael Schrage,et al.  Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate , 1999 .

[42]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[43]  Malcolm McCullough,et al.  Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand , 1996 .

[44]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[45]  Antonio Strati Organizations Viewed through the Lens of Aesthetics , 1996 .

[46]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[47]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  To Transfer is to Transform: The Circulation of Safety Knowledge , 2000 .

[48]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Making Projects Critical , 2006 .

[49]  Davide Nicolini Studying visual practices in construction , 2007 .

[50]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[51]  Cecilia Enberg,et al.  Exploring the Dynamics of Knowledge Integration , 2006 .

[52]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..