Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos.

BACKGROUND The disposal of unused cryopreserved embryos can be a difficult decision for patients and the existence of unclaimed embryos raises ethical concerns for clinics. This study examined changes in patients' preferences for disposition of unused embryos and the relevance of a two-stage process for obtaining consent. METHODS Patients who had not returned for cryopreserved embryos for over 5 years were contacted and asked to specify their current preferences for embryo disposition. These preferences were compared with dispositional choices made at the time of embryo freezing. RESULTS Over one-third of patients had not returned for cryopreserved embryos within 5 years, and 31% of these declined to provide an updated directive. Those with a live birth through treatment were more likely to provide a new directive and more likely to choose to discard rather than donate embryos for research. Prior to IVF, the majority of non-returnees had elected to donate unused embryos for research, but 59% of all couples changed their minds after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Changes in preferences for embryo disposition was linked to treatment outcome and highlighted the need for a two-stage process to obtain fully informed consent. In this Canadian sample, patients' affinity for research declined after treatment.

[1]  A. Pinborg,et al.  Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[2]  Y. Englert,et al.  Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  G. Pennings What are the ownership rights for gametes and embryos? Advance directives and the disposition of cryopreserved gametes and embryos. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[4]  J. Czyba,et al.  Six year follow-up of cryopreserved human embryos. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[5]  A. Borini,et al.  Fate of stored embryos: our 10 years experience. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  C. C. Fair,et al.  Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  R. Brzyski Efficacy of postal communication with patients who have cryopreserved pre-embryos. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  Sheryl de Lacey,et al.  Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos , 2005 .

[9]  R. Nachtigall,et al.  Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  A. Lyerly,et al.  The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[11]  R. Siegberg,et al.  Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[12]  F. Baylis,et al.  Cryopreserved human embryos in Canada and their availability for research. , 2003, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[13]  R. Weir,et al.  Establishment of a successful donor embryo program: medical, ethical, and policy issues. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  S C Klock,et al.  The disposition of unused frozen embryos. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Boivin,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos , 2001, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

[16]  J. Nisker,et al.  The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research , 2005, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[17]  R. Chetkowski,et al.  Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.