Comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® and Mc Coy laryngoscope in the presence of rigid cervical collar simulating cervical immobilisation for traumatic cervical spine injury

Background: It is difficult to visualise the larynx using conventional laryngoscopy in the presence of cervical spine immobilisation. Airtraq® provides for easy and successful intubation in the neutral neck position. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Airtraq in comparison with the Mc Coy laryngoscope, when performing tracheal intubation in patients with neck immobilisation using hard cervical collar and manual in-line axial cervical spine stabilisation. Methods: A randomised, cross-over, open-labelled study was undertaken in 60 ASA I and II patients aged between 20 and 50 years, belonging to either gender, scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures. Following induction and adequate muscle relaxation, they were intubated using either of the techniques first, followed by the other. Intubation time and Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) were noted using Mc Coy laryngoscope and Airtraq. The anaesthesiologist was asked to grade the ease of intubation on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 1–10. Chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between the groups and paired sample t-test for comparison of continuous data. IDS score and VAS were compared using Wilcoxon Signed ranked test. Results: The mean intubation time was 33.27 sec (13.25) for laryngoscopy and 28.95 sec (18.53) for Airtraq (P=0.32). The median IDS values were 4 (interquartile range (IQR) 1–6) and 0 (IQR 0–1) for laryngoscopy and Airtraq, respectively (P=0.007). The median Cormack Lehane glottic view grade was 3 (IQR 2–4) and 1 (IQR 1–1) for laryngoscopy and Airtraq, respectively (P=0.003). The ease of intubation on VAS was graded as 4 (IQR 3–5) for laryngoscopy and 2 (IQR 2–2) for Airtraq (P=0.033). There were two failures to intubate with the Airtraq. Conclusion: Airtraq improves the ease of intubation significantly when compared to Mc Coy blade in patients immobilised with cervical collar and manual in-line stabilisation simulating cervical spine injury.

[1]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial. , 2012, Resuscitation.

[2]  Chien‐Chih Chen,et al.  Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2011, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[3]  R. Rossaint,et al.  The use of the Airtraq® optical laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in high-risk cardio-surgical patients , 2011, BMC Research Notes.

[4]  J. Koh,et al.  Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation , 2010, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[5]  G. Norman.  Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[6]  K. Toker,et al.  Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilisation of the cervical spine: a comparison of Airtraq® and LMA CTrach™ devices * , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[7]  T. Turkstra,et al.  Cervical Spine Motion: A Fluoroscopic Comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh Laryngoscope , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[8]  R. Amathieu,et al.  Optimising tracheal intubation success rate using the Airtraq laryngoscope , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[9]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation* , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[10]  J. Laffey,et al.  Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq Laryngoscopes , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[11]  J. Laffey,et al.  A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[12]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy – a manikin study * , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[13]  C. Goutcher,et al.  Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  H. Wakeling,et al.  The intubating laryngeal mask airway does not facilitate tracheal intubation in the presence of a neck collar in simulated trauma. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  Charles E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of tracheal intubation difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: fiberoptic (WuScope) versus conventional laryngoscopy. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[16]  G. Schwarz,et al.  Fiberoptic intubation in 327 neurosurgical patients with lesions of the cervical spine. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[17]  F Adnet,et al.  The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS): Proposal and Evaluation of a New Score Characterizing the Complexity of Endotracheal Intubation , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[18]  K. Heath.  The effect on laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilization techniques , 1994, Anaesthesia.