Construction Grammar (CG) as developed by Fillmore, Goldberg and others is a recent development in syntactic theory, which has become more and more influential. Its central claim is that in a language there are a large number of grammatical units, called constructions, which are the basic forms for the speakers to express their meanings. Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG), put forward by Halliday, also pays great attention to how the speakers generate utterances and texts to convey their intended meanings. This paper explores the relationship between CG and SFG. It argues that the concept of constructions should be introduced in SFG and reflected in the transitivity network. It also suggests that main ideas from SFG be used in CG to describe language more adequately. The objective is to make SFG and CG better theories of language, by combining their strengths.
[1]
C. Fillmore,et al.
Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction
,
1999
.
[2]
Michael Halliday,et al.
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
,
1985
.
[3]
Robin P. Fawcett,et al.
A Theory of Syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics
,
2000
.
[4]
A. Goldberg.
Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure
,
1995
.
[5]
R. Langacker.
Foundations of cognitive grammar
,
1983
.
[6]
Hans C. Boas,et al.
A Constructional Approach to Resultatives
,
2003
.
[7]
C. Fillmore,et al.
Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone
,
1988
.