Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences

Project success is critical in the crowdfunding domain. Rather than the existing project‐centric prediction methods, we propose a novel backer‐centric prediction method. We identify each backer's preferences based on their pledge history and calculate the cosine similarity between backer's preferences and the project as each backer's persuasibility. Finally, we aggregate all the backers' persuasibility to predict project success. To validate our method, we crawled data on 183,886 projects launched during or before December 2014 on Kickstarter, a crowdfunding website. We selected 4,922 backers with a total of 442,793 pledges to identify backers' preferences. The results show that a backer is more likely to be persuaded by a project that is more similar to the backer's preferences. Our findings not only demonstrate the efficacy of backers' pledge history for predicting crowdfunding project success but also verify that a backer‐centric method can supplement the existing project‐centric approaches. Our model and findings enable crowdfunding platform agencies, fund‐seeking entrepreneurs, and investors to predict the success of a crowdfunding project.

[1]  Phillip H. Kim,et al.  TMI Signaling Credible Claims in Crowdfunding Campaign Narratives , 2016 .

[2]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents , 2014, ICML.

[3]  G. Miller,et al.  An Expectancy Interpretation of Language and Persuasion , 2018, Recent Advances in Language, Communication, and Social Psychology.

[4]  Roger H. L. Chiang,et al.  Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  G. Tyge Payne,et al.  Family Business and Market Orientation , 2011 .

[6]  Jesse C. Bockstedt,et al.  Quality Assessment of Peer-Produced Content in Knowledge Repositories using Development and Coordination Activities , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Mary Talbot,et al.  Gender and Language , 2006 .

[8]  Thanh Tran,et al.  How to Succeed in Crowdfunding: a Long-Term Study in Kickstarter , 2016, ArXiv.

[9]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Christian Hopp,et al.  Do User Entrepreneurs Speak Different?: Applying Natural Language Processing to Crowdfunding Videos , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  The determinants of crowdfunding success: A semantic text analytics approach , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Cognitive Responses in Persuasion , 2014 .

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Communication and persuasion , 1986 .

[14]  Dan M. Marom,et al.  Are the life and death of an early-stage venture indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches , 2018, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[15]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[16]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  CyberGate: A Design Framework and System for Text Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, MIS Q..

[17]  Annaleena Parhankangas,et al.  Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs , 2017 .

[18]  Regan M. Stevenson,et al.  The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance , 2018, Journal of Business Venturing.

[19]  Carl I. Hovland,et al.  Personality and Persuasibility , 1982 .

[20]  Matthew L. Jensen,et al.  Credibility of Anonymous Online Product Reviews: A Language Expectancy Perspective , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[22]  G. Tellis,et al.  Mining Marketing Meaning from Online Chatter: Strategic Brand Analysis of Big Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2014 .

[23]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Person-Job Fit , 2018, ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[25]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Nathanael Chambers,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Schemas and their Participants , 2009, ACL.

[27]  Edmund A. Mennis The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[28]  E. Gerber,et al.  Crowdfunding : Why People Are Motivated to Post and Fund Projects on Crowdfunding Platforms , 2011 .

[29]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[30]  Phillip H. Kim,et al.  TMI , 2016 .

[31]  Ashlee Humphreys,et al.  Automated Text Analysis , 2018, Handbook of Market Research.

[32]  Peter Daly,et al.  Structural, linguistic and rhetorical features of the entrepreneurial pitch , 2016 .

[33]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[34]  George M. Belknap Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. By Carl I. Hovland, Irving L. Janis and Harold H. Kelley. (New Haven: Yale University Press. 1953. Pp. xii, 315. $4.50.) , 1954, American Political Science Review.

[35]  Rebecca Jen-Hui Wang,et al.  Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research , 2018 .

[36]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Kjersten Bunker Whittington,et al.  Gender and venture capital decision-making: the effects of technical background and social capital on entrepreneurial evaluations. , 2015, Social science research.

[38]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[39]  Nancy Gibbs,et al.  Life and Death , 2000, Nature.

[40]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  The language that gets people to give: phrases that predict success on kickstarter , 2014, CSCW.

[41]  M. Burgoon,et al.  Language expectancy theory. , 2002 .

[42]  Blakley C. Davis,et al.  Funders' positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs' crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion , 2017 .

[43]  B. Bayus,et al.  Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers , 2018 .

[44]  Dan Watt,et al.  Quality Assessment , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[45]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  How Language Can Influence Political Marketing Strategy and a Candidate's Image: Effect of Presidential Candidates' Language Intensity and Experience on College Students' Ratings of Source Credibility , 2016 .

[46]  Andreea D. Gorbatai,et al.  Gender and the Language of Crowdfunding , 2015 .

[47]  Ethan Mollick The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study , 2014 .

[48]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding , 2017, Electron. Commer. Res..

[49]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Finding a Needle in the Haystack: Recommending Online Communities on Social Media Platforms Using Network and Design Science , 2021, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Huigang Liang,et al.  Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success , 2018, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[51]  Jeremy Piger,et al.  Beyond the Numbers: Measuring the Information Content of Earnings Press Release Language*: Content of Earnings Press Release Language , 2012 .

[52]  Magdalena Balazinska Big data research , 2015, VLDB 2015.

[53]  Joshua M. Averbeck Irony and Language Expectancy Theory: Evaluations of Expectancy Violation Outcomes , 2010 .