A framework for evaluating the spatial configuration and temporal dynamics of hydraulic patches

A framework for evaluating the spatial configuration and temporal dynamics of hydraulic patches was tested in a UK lowland river. Detailed hydraulic assessment was carried out at four discharges between 0.303m3/s and 1.410m3/s in a 56m reach. Five hydraulic patches, as combinations of depth and mean column velocity, and the transitional zones between them were delineated using fuzzy cluster analysis. The composition and configuration of the hydraulic patch mosaic was quantified using spatial metrics. Results showed that the proportion, size, shape and relative location of hydraulic patches all varied with discharge, however intermediate flows appeared to support the most diverse hydraulic patch composition and configuration. This suggests the spatial influence of mesoscale bedforms on hydraulic patches is mediated by temporal variations in discharge. Transitional areas between hydraulic patches occupied a significant proportion of the reach at all flows (33–38%) and may function as in-stream ecotones. The framework addresses the need for a quantitative, spatially explicit approach to hydraulic assessment which could be used to assess the implications of flow regulation and hydromorphological alteration on hydraulic diversity.

[1]  J. Mount,et al.  The influence of relative sediment supply on riverine habitat heterogeneity , 2006 .

[2]  Jon P. Sadler,et al.  Linking hydrology and biology to assess the water needs of river ecosystems , 2006 .

[3]  Xiaojun Yang,et al.  Quantifying landscape pattern and its change in an estuarine watershed using satellite imagery and landscape metrics , 2005 .

[4]  C. Johnston,et al.  The Potential Importance of Boundaries of Fluvial Ecosystems , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[5]  K. Rowntree,et al.  Application of the hydraulic biotope concept to the classification of instream habitats , 1998 .

[6]  Hui Lin,et al.  Formalizing fuzzy objects from uncertain classification results , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  N. Friberg,et al.  Two lowland stream riffles – linkages between physical habitats and macroinvertebrates across multiple spatial scales , 2007, Aquatic Ecology.

[8]  K. Tockner,et al.  Aquatic habitat diversity along the corridor of an Alpine flood plain river (Fiume Tagliamento, Italy)n , 2000 .

[9]  F. Dyer,et al.  Managing river flows for hydraulic diversity: an example of an upland regulated gravel‐bed river , 2006 .

[10]  D. Scarnecchia,et al.  Observer Variability in Classifying Habitat Types in Stream Surveys , 1995 .

[11]  M. Turner.  Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  G. Harvey,et al.  Microscale hydrodynamics and coherent flow structures in rivers: Implications for the characterization of physical habitat , 2009 .

[13]  G. Pasternack,et al.  Relationships between mesoscale morphological units, stream hydraulics and Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning habitat on the Lower Yuba River, California , 2008 .

[14]  E. Herricks,et al.  Fish use of ecohydraulic‐based mesohabitat units in a low‐gradient Illinois stream: implications for stream restoration , 2008 .

[15]  P. Reichert,et al.  Predicting joint frequency distributions of depth and velocity for instream habitat assessment , 2007 .

[16]  G. Woodward,et al.  Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management , 2009 .

[17]  J. Gore,et al.  Hydraulic Stream Ecology: Observed Patterns and Potential Applications , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine landscape diversity , 2002 .

[19]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  On cluster validity for the fuzzy c-means model , 1995, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[20]  Geoffrey C. Poole,et al.  IN‐STREAM HABITAT UNIT CLASSIFICATION: INADEQUACIES FOR MONITORING AND SOME CONSEQUENCES FOR MANAGEMENT 1 , 1997 .

[21]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Alternative representations of in‐stream habitat: classification using remote sensing, hydraulic modeling, and fuzzy logic , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  M. Newson,et al.  Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges , 2000 .

[23]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Indices of landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and history , 2006 .

[25]  D. Ayllón,et al.  Interactive effects of cover and hydraulics on brown trout habitat selection patterns , 2009 .

[26]  G. Harvey,et al.  Physical habitat, eco-hydraulics and river design: a review and re-evaluation of some popular concepts and methods , 2006 .

[27]  G. Petts,et al.  Classifying the hydraulic performance of riffle–pool bedforms for habitat assessment and river rehabilitation design , 2003 .

[28]  G. Poole.  Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum , 2002 .

[29]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[30]  Rebecca Bartley,et al.  Measuring the reach‐scale geomorphic diversity of streams: application to a stream disturbed by a sediment slug , 2005 .

[31]  Chris S. Renschler,et al.  Geomorphology and ecosystems: Challenges and keys for success in bridging disciplines , 2007 .

[32]  Mikio Inoue,et al.  Habitat structure along channel‐unit sequences for juvenile salmon: a subunit‐based analysis of in‐stream landscapes , 1999 .

[33]  D. Royall,et al.  Hydraulic habitat composition and diversity in rural and urban stream reaches of the North Carolina Piedmont (USA) , 2008 .

[34]  S. Kark,et al.  Ecotones: Marginal or Central Areas of Transition? , 2006 .

[35]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[36]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[37]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[38]  K. Tockner,et al.  Landscape ecology: a framework for integrating pattern and process in river corridors , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  A fuzzy c-means classification of elevation derivatives to extract the morphometric classification of landforms in Snowdonia, Wales , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[40]  David Gilvear,et al.  Investigating a major assumption of predictive instream habitat models: is water velocity preference of juvenile Atlantic salmon independent of discharge? , 2001 .

[41]  Gerardo Beni,et al.  A Validity Measure for Fuzzy Clustering , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[42]  Michael K. Young,et al.  A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features , 1993 .

[43]  J. Reynolds,et al.  On definition and quantification of heterogeneity , 1995 .

[44]  P. Burrough,et al.  Fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  I. Jowett,et al.  Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel‐bed rivers , 2003 .

[46]  Y. L. Coarer.  Hydraulic signatures for ecological modelling at different scales , 2007, Aquatic Ecology.