Markedness and Word Structure : OCP Effects in Japanese

ing away from any ordering due to multiple violation of single constraints, (16) shows the harmonic ordering of candidates induced by (15) (see Prince & Smolensky 1993, 68-71 for the notation). Curly braces enclose the list of marks of each candidate: the candidate violating only C 1 has the mark {*C1}, the candidate violating C 1 and C2 is marked {*C1, *C2}, and the candidate violating no constraints is assigned { L} (the empty list). (16) Evaluation of marks: less harmonic {* } {* ,* } $# {* } {* } #$ {L} most harmonic The important point is a familiar one: Under direct strict domination, the candidate {* ,* } is more harmonic than the candidate {*}, even though the former has two violations and the latter only one. This is the celebrated strictness of strict domination, depicted in (17) in the familiar tableau form.

[1]  W. S. Allen.  Some Prosodic Aspects of Retroflexion and Aspiration in Sanskrit , 1951, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies.

[2]  Manfred Mayrhofer,et al.  A Sanskrit Grammar , 1972 .

[3]  Evidence of a Consonant Shift in 7th Century Japanese , 1972 .

[4]  A. Prince,et al.  On stress and linguistic rhythm , 1977 .

[5]  J. Marshall Unger,et al.  Studies in early Japanese morphophonemics , 1977 .

[6]  THEO VENNEMANN,et al.  UNIVERSAL SYLLABIC PHONOLOGY , 1978 .

[7]  T. Vance,et al.  Some Aspects of Rendaku in Japanese and Related Problems in Theoretical Issues in Japanese Linguistics. , 1980 .

[8]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  On The Nature of Phonological Representation , 1981 .

[9]  Taro Kageyama.  Word formation in Japanese , 1982 .

[10]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[11]  M. Fourakis,et al.  On the ‘Incomplete Neutralization’ of German Final Obstruents , 1984 .

[12]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[13]  Yoko Sugioka,et al.  Interaction of Derivational Morphology and Syntax in Japanese and English , 2018 .

[14]  Ellen M. Kaisse.  Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology , 1985 .

[15]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Some consequences of Lexical Phonology , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[16]  R. Port,et al.  Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German , 1985 .

[17]  J. McCarthy.  OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination , 1986 .

[18]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An introduction to Japanese phonology , 1987 .

[19]  Scott Myers,et al.  Tone and the structure of words in Shona , 1987 .

[20]  窪薗 晴夫,et al.  The organization of Japanese prosody , 1987 .

[21]  M. Yip.  The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity , 1988 .

[22]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Linear order in phonological representation , 1989 .

[23]  R. Port,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German , 1989 .

[24]  Junko Ito,et al.  Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics , 1989 .

[25]  Draga Zec,et al.  The Phonology-syntax connection , 1990 .

[26]  Alan Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology : constraint interaction and satisfaction , 1993 .

[27]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Generalized alignment , 1993 .

[28]  L. Lombardi.  Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization , 1997 .

[29]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[30]  M. Kenstowicz.  Base-Identity and Uniform Exponence: Alternatives to Cyclicity , 1995 .

[31]  J. McCarthy.  Extensions of faithfulness: Rotuman revisited , 1995 .

[32]  Sharon Inkelas,et al.  Level Ordering and Economy in the Lexical Phonology of Turkish. , 1995 .

[33]  Junko Ito,et al.  Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory , 1995 .

[34]  Andrew L. Sihler,et al.  New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin , 1995 .

[35]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Phonological phrases : their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence , 1995 .

[36]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[37]  Arnulf Mester,et al.  The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on ranking , 1995 .

[38]  Laura Benua.  Identity Effects in Morphological Truncation , 1995 .

[39]  Megan J. Crowhurst,et al.  Conjunctive Constraints and Templates in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[40]  Armin Mester,et al.  Stem and word in Sino-Japanese , 1996 .

[41]  Junko Ito,et al.  Correspondence and Compositionality: The Ga-gyō Variation in Japanese Phonology , 1996 .

[42]  Junko Ito,et al.  Prosodic faithfulness and correspondence: Evidence from a Japanese argot , 1996 .

[43]  A. M. Ramer.  A letter from an incompletely neutral phonologist , 1996 .

[44]  Luigi Burzio.  Cycles, Non-Derived-Environment Blocking, and Correspondence , 1997 .

[45]  Junko Ito,et al.  Sympathy theory and German truncations , 1997 .

[46]  D. Steriade.  Lexical conservatism and its analysis , 1997 .

[47]  Philip Spaelti,et al.  Dimensions of Variation in Multi-Pattern Reduplication , 1997 .

[48]  J. Grimshaw.  Projection, heads, and optimality , 1997 .

[49]  R. Kager.  Generalized alignment and morphological parsing , 1997 .

[50]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Markedness , Segment Realisation , and Locality in Spreading * , 1997 .

[51]  Jaye Padgett.  Perceptual Distance of Contrast: Vowel Height and Nasality , 1997 .

[52]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[53]  L. Lombardi.  Positional Faithfulness and Voicing Assimilation in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[54]  Kazutaka Kurisu,et al.  Richness of the Base and Root Fusion in Sino-Japanese , 2000 .