Serial Dependence in Position Perception Occurs at the Time of Perception

Observers perceive objects in the world as stable over space and time, even though the visual experience of those objects is often discontinuous and distorted due to masking, occlusion, camouflage, noise, etc. How are we able to easily and quickly achieve stable perception in spite of this constantly changing visual input? It was previously shown that observers experience serial dependence in the perception of features and objects, an effect that extends up to 15 seconds back in time. Here, we asked whether the visual system utilizes an object’s prior physical location to inform future position assignments in order to maximize location stability of an object over time. To test this, we presented subjects with small targets at random angular locations relative to central fixation in the peripheral visual field. Subjects reported the perceived location of the target on each trial by adjusting a cursor’s position to match its location. Subjects made consistent errors when reporting the perceived position of the target on the current trial, mislocalizing it toward the position of the target in the preceding two trials (Experiment 1). This pull in position perception occurred even when a response was not required on the previous trial (Experiment 2). In addition, we show that serial dependence in perceived position occurs immediately after stimulus presentation, and is a fast stabilization mechanism that does not require a delay (Experiment 3). This indicates that serial dependence occurs for position representations and facilitates the stable perception of objects in space. Taken together with previous work, our results show that serial dependence occurs at many stages of visual processing, from initial position assignment to object categorization.

[1]  R. Snowden,et al.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion , 1998, Current Biology.

[2]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Metacontrast investigations of sustained-transient channel inhibitory interactions. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  David Whitney,et al.  Stable individual signatures in object localization , 2017, Current Biology.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  David Badcock,et al.  Localization of element clusters by the human visual system , 1994, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Zoccolan,et al.  Transformation-Tolerant Object Recognition in Rats Revealed by Visual Priming , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  F. D. Lange,et al.  Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision , 2017, Current Biology.

[8]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Confidence Leak in Perceptual Decision Making , 2015, Psychological science.

[9]  Daniel P. Bliss,et al.  Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory , 2017, bioRxiv.

[10]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in visual perception , 2011 .

[11]  David Alais,et al.  Different coding strategies for the perception of stable and changeable facial attributes , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  A. Kristofferson,et al.  Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses , 1973 .

[13]  D. Raab Backward masking. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  D. Alais,et al.  Love at second sight: Sequential dependence of facial attractiveness in an on-line dating paradigm , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Charalampos Papadimitriou,et al.  Ghosts in the machine: memory interference from the previous trial. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  R. Lange,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision and the threshold for adaptation. , 1973, Vision research.

[17]  David Whitney,et al.  The perceived stability of scenes: serial dependence in ensemble representations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[19]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Proactive interference from items previously stored in visual working memory , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[20]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[21]  Antoine Coutrot,et al.  Face exploration dynamics differentiate men and women. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[22]  P. A. Kolers Intensity and contour effects in visual masking , 1962 .

[23]  David Whitney,et al.  Second-order motion shifts perceived position , 2006, Vision Research.

[24]  L. H. Shaffer,et al.  Timing in the Motor Programming of Typing , 1978 .

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces , 2014, Current Biology.

[27]  A. Pantle,et al.  Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals , 1997, Nature.

[30]  David Whitney,et al.  Perceptual stability without working memory , 2016 .

[31]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  David Whitaker,et al.  Motion Adaptation Distorts Perceived Visual Position , 2002, Current Biology.

[33]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Daniel P. Bliss,et al.  Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  Kohske Takahashi,et al.  Sequential Effects in Face-Attractiveness Judgment , 2012, Perception.

[40]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[41]  T. Freeman,et al.  Saccadic compensation for reflexive optokinetic nystagmus just as good as compensation for volitional pursuit. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[42]  David Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence in the perception of attractiveness , 2015, Journal of vision.

[43]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  D. Kerzel Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target , 2000, Vision Research.

[45]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  David C. Burr,et al.  Compression of visual space before saccades , 1997, Nature.

[47]  David Whitney,et al.  Facilitating Stable Representations: Serial Dependence in Vision , 2011, PloS one.

[48]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Sensory adaptation as optimal resource allocation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges , 1990, Perception.

[50]  Kyriaki Mikellidou,et al.  Serial dependencies act directly on perception. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[51]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion , 2005, Current Biology.

[52]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  D. Whitney,et al.  Serial dependence promotes object stability during occlusion , 2016, Journal of vision.

[54]  D. Levi,et al.  The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location , 1997, Vision Research.

[55]  David Alais,et al.  Linear Summation of Repulsive and Attractive Serial Dependencies: Orientation and Motion Dependencies Sum in Motion Perception , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  Kyriaki Mikellidou,et al.  The oblique effect is both allocentric and egocentric. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[57]  Floris P. de Lange,et al.  Perceptual Decision-Making: Picking the Low-Hanging Fruit? , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.