Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Standard-Risk AML.

BACKGROUND Despite the molecular heterogeneity of standard-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), treatment decisions are based on a limited number of molecular genetic markers and morphology-based assessment of remission. Sensitive detection of a leukemia-specific marker (e.g., a mutation in the gene encoding nucleophosmin [NPM1]) could improve prognostication by identifying submicroscopic disease during remission. METHODS We used a reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction assay to detect minimal residual disease in 2569 samples obtained from 346 patients with NPM1-mutated AML who had undergone intensive treatment in the National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial. We used a custom 51-gene panel to perform targeted sequencing of 223 samples obtained at the time of diagnosis and 49 samples obtained at the time of relapse. Mutations associated with preleukemic clones were tracked by means of digital polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Molecular profiling highlighted the complexity of NPM1-mutated AML, with segregation of patients into more than 150 subgroups, thus precluding reliable outcome prediction. The determination of minimal-residual-disease status was more informative. Persistence of NPM1-mutated transcripts in blood was present in 15% of the patients after the second chemotherapy cycle and was associated with a greater risk of relapse after 3 years of follow-up than was an absence of such transcripts (82% vs. 30%; hazard ratio, 4.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.95 to 7.80; P<0.001) and a lower rate of survival (24% vs. 75%; hazard ratio for death, 4.38; 95% CI, 2.57 to 7.47; P<0.001). The presence of minimal residual disease was the only independent prognostic factor for death in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 4.84; 95% CI, 2.57 to 9.15; P<0.001). These results were validated in an independent cohort. On sequential monitoring of minimal residual disease, relapse was reliably predicted by a rising level of NPM1-mutated transcripts. Although mutations associated with preleukemic clones remained detectable during ongoing remission after chemotherapy, NPM1 mutations were detected in 69 of 70 patients at the time of relapse and provided a better marker of disease status. CONCLUSIONS The presence of minimal residual disease, as determined by quantitation of NPM1-mutated transcripts, provided powerful prognostic information independent of other risk factors. (Funded by Bloodwise and the National Institute for Health Research; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN55675535.).

[1]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Yao,et al.  Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients bearing nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations , 2007, Leukemia.

[3]  R. Hills,et al.  Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. , 2010, Blood.

[4]  I. Weissman,et al.  Preleukemic mutations in human acute myeloid leukemia affect epigenetic regulators and persist in remission , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  Review Articles (434 articles) , 2008 .

[6]  B. Falini,et al.  Quantitative assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia carrying nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene mutations , 2006, Leukemia.

[7]  Paola Fazi,et al.  Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  K. Döhner,et al.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the German-Austrian acute myeloid leukemia study group. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  M. Schrappe Detection and management of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2014, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[11]  D. Grimwade,et al.  Molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia in younger adults and its clinical relevance. , 2016, Blood.

[12]  R. Arceci Age-Related Prognostic Impact of Different Types of DNMT3A Mutations in Adults With Primary Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia , 2012 .

[13]  N. Socci,et al.  Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  T. Lister,et al.  Segmental uniparental disomy is a commonly acquired genetic event in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Blood.

[15]  R. Hills,et al.  A Sensitive Risk Score for Directing Treatment in Younger Patients with AML. , 2006 .

[16]  R. Hills,et al.  Impact of FLT3(ITD) mutant allele level on relapse risk in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia. , 2014, Blood.

[17]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Minimal residual disease levels assessed by NPM1 mutation-specific RQ-PCR provide important prognostic information in AML. , 2009, Blood.

[18]  E. Hoster,et al.  Molecular response assessment by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction after induction therapy in NPM1-mutated patients identifies those at high risk of relapse , 2014, Haematologica.

[19]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types , 2013, Nature.

[20]  F. Lo‐Coco,et al.  Prospective minimal residual disease monitoring to predict relapse of acute promyelocytic leukemia and to direct pre-emptive arsenic trioxide therapy. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Downregulation of the Wnt inhibitor CXXC5 predicts a better prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2015, Blood.

[22]  R. Schlenk,et al.  The European LeukemiaNet AML Working Party consensus statement on allogeneic HSCT for patients with AML in remission: an integrated-risk adapted approach , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[23]  R. Hills,et al.  The prognostic relevance of flt3 and npm1 mutations on older patients treated intensively or non-intensively: a study of 1312 patients in the UK NCRI AML16 trial , 2014, Leukemia.

[24]  J. Cayuela,et al.  Impact of additional genetic alterations on the outcome of patients with NPM1-mutated cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia , 2014, Haematologica.

[25]  P. Guldberg,et al.  Persistence of DNMT3A mutations at long‐term remission in adult patients with AML , 2014, British journal of haematology.

[26]  R. Hills,et al.  A randomized comparison of daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 vs 60 mg/m2 in AML induction: results from the UK NCRI AML17 trial in 1206 patients. , 2014, Blood.

[27]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  DNMT 3 A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia , 2016 .

[28]  Axel Benner,et al.  Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  H. Cavé,et al.  Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real-time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia – A Europe Against Cancer Program , 2003, Leukemia.

[30]  D. Grimwade,et al.  Defining minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: which platforms are ready for "prime time"? , 2014, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[31]  Thomas J. Hudson,et al.  Corrigendum: Identification of pre-leukaemic haematopoietic stem cells in acute leukaemia , 2014, Nature.

[32]  A. Kohlmann,et al.  A novel hierarchical prognostic model of AML solely based on molecular mutations. , 2012, Blood.

[33]  R. Hills,et al.  Simpson's Paradox and the Impact of Different DNMT3A Mutations on Outcome in Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  R. Gale,et al.  Should persons with acute myeloid leukemia have a transplant in first remission? , 2014, Leukemia.

[35]  O. Landt,et al.  The level of residual disease based on mutant NPM1 is an independent prognostic factor for relapse and survival in AML. , 2013, Blood.

[36]  L. Bullinger,et al.  Clonal evolution in relapsed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. , 2013, Blood.

[37]  R. Hills,et al.  Utility of a clinical risk score to identify high‐risk patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission after high‐dose cytarabine (HiDAC) based induction chemotherapy , 2013, British journal of haematology.

[38]  O. Blau DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia , 2016 .

[39]  J. Cayuela,et al.  MRD assessed by WT1 and NPM1 transcript levels identifies distinct outcomes in AML patients and is influenced by gemtuzumab ozogamicin , 2014, Oncotarget.