Texture Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Focused on Contrast-Enhancing Lesions in Predicting Survival for Bevacizumab-Treated Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma

Simple Summary After treatment, glioblastoma typically recurs. In some patients with recurrent glioblastoma, bevacizumab improves progression-free survival. The magnetic resonance texture analysis quantifies the macroscopic tissue heterogeneity that is indirectly linked to the microscopic tissue properties. In 33 patients with recurrent glioblastoma who were treated with bevacizumab, we evaluated the predictive value of magnetic resonance texture analysis for survival. Volumes of contrast-enhancing lesions segmented on postcontrast T1-weighted sequences were co-registered with apparent diffusion coefficient maps in order to extract 107 radiomic features. We found that some features derived from texture analysis accurately predicted survival. Identifying pretreatment imaging biomarkers that predict outcomes following bevacizumab therapy for recurrent glioblastoma can be beneficial for selecting patients most likely to benefit from this costly treatment. These promising preliminary results may be a small but significant step toward demonstrating the clinical relevance of radiomic profiles in the treatment of this disease. Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma often recurs after treatment. Bevacizumab increases progression-free survival in some patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Identifying pretreatment predictors of survival can help clinical decision making. Magnetic resonance texture analysis (MRTA) quantifies macroscopic tissue heterogeneity indirectly linked to microscopic tissue properties. We investigated the usefulness of MRTA in predicting survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Methods: We evaluated retrospective longitudinal data from 33 patients (20 men; mean age 56 ± 13 years) who received bevacizumab on the first recurrence of glioblastoma. Volumes of contrast-enhancing lesions segmented on postcontrast T1-weighted sequences were co-registered on apparent diffusion coefficient maps to extract 107 radiomic features. To assess the performance of textural parameters in predicting progression-free survival and overall survival, we used receiver operating characteristic curves, univariate and multivariate regression analysis, and Kaplan–Meier plots. Results: Longer progression-free survival (>6 months) and overall survival (>1 year) were associated with lower values of major axis length (MAL), a lower maximum 2D diameter row (m2Ddr), and higher skewness values. Longer progression-free survival was also associated with higher kurtosis, and longer overall survival with higher elongation values. The model combining MAL, m2Ddr, and skewness best predicted progression-free survival at 6 months (AUC 0.886, 100% sensitivity, 77.8% specificity, 50% PPV, 100% NPV), and the model combining m2Ddr, elongation, and skewness best predicted overall survival (AUC 0.895, 83.3% sensitivity, 85.2% specificity, 55.6% PPV, 95.8% NPV). Conclusions: Our preliminary analyses suggest that in patients with recurrent glioblastoma pretreatment, MRTA helps to predict survival after bevacizumab treatment.

[1]  P. Perrini,et al.  Old and New Systemic Immune-Inflammation Indexes Are Associated with Overall Survival of Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Radio-Chemotherapy , 2022, Genes.

[2]  I. Pesaresi,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging following postoperative radiotherapy in clinical decision-making of patients with high-grade glioma , 2022, La radiologia medica.

[3]  I. Baranowska-Bosiacka,et al.  Epidemiology of Glioblastoma Multiforme–Literature Review , 2022, Cancers.

[4]  A. Hagiwara,et al.  Pretreatment ADC Histogram Analysis as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Bevacizumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2022, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014-2018. , 2021, Neuro-oncology.

[6]  F. Prados,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Recent Advances and Applications. , 2021, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[7]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Radiomic Analysis to Predict Outcome in Recurrent Glioblastoma Based on Multi-Center MR Imaging From the Prospective DIRECTOR Trial , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[8]  P. Wen,et al.  Assessment of tumor hypoxia and perfusion in recurrent glioblastoma following bevacizumab failure using MRI and 18F-FMISO PET , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[9]  A. Oronsky,et al.  A Review of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[10]  Amit Agarwal,et al.  Survival prediction in glioblastoma on post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging using filtration based first-order texture analysis: Comparison of multiple machine learning models , 2021, The neuroradiology journal.

[11]  P. Wen,et al.  Validation of diffusion MRI as a biomarker for efficacy using randomized phase III trial of bevacizumab with or without VB-111 in recurrent glioblastoma , 2021, Neuro-oncology advances.

[12]  H. Sharma,et al.  Advanced multimodal imaging in differentiating glioma recurrence from post-radiotherapy changes. , 2020, International review of neurobiology.

[13]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phenotypes Predict Overall Survival Benefit From Bevacizumab or Surgery in Recurrent Glioblastoma With Large Tumor Burden. , 2020, Neurosurgery.

[14]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Histopathology‐validated machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination between true progression and pseudo‐progression in glioblastoma , 2020, Cancer.

[15]  R. Verhaak,et al.  Molecular Evolution of IDH Wild-Type Glioblastomas Treated With Standard of Care Affects Survival and Design of Precision Medicine Trials: A Report From the EORTC 1542 Study. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Kazunari Yoshida,et al.  The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment: perspectives for therapeutic implications , 2019, Medical Oncology.

[17]  K. Ahn,et al.  Analysis of heterogeneity of peritumoral T2 hyperintensity in patients with pretreatment glioblastoma: Prognostic value of MRI-based radiomics. , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Leonard Wee,et al.  Technical Note: Ontology‐guided radiomics analysis workflow (O‐RAW) , 2019, Medical physics.

[19]  Yonehiro Kanemura,et al.  Radiomics and MGMT promoter methylation for prognostication of newly diagnosed glioblastoma , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[20]  S. Priya,et al.  Texture Analysis in Cerebral Gliomas: A Review of the Literature , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  Tamim Niazi,et al.  Radiomics in Glioblastoma: Current Status and Challenges Facing Clinical Implementation , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[22]  J. Pallud,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes Following Reoperation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Time to Consider the Timing of Reoperation , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[23]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab , 2017, Neuro-oncology.

[25]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[26]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Radiomic Analysis Reveals Prognostic Information in T1-Weighted Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Glioblastoma , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[27]  M. Götz,et al.  Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  H. Vargas,et al.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-derived Histogram Metrics for Assessment of Response after Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience and Comparison between Single-Section and Volumetric Analyses. , 2016, Radiology.

[29]  Juan J. Martinez,et al.  Evaluation of tumor-derived MRI-texture features for discrimination of molecular subtypes and prediction of 12-month survival status in glioblastoma. , 2015, Medical physics.

[30]  Timothy C Ryken,et al.  Toward precision medicine in glioblastoma: the promise and the challenges. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[31]  P. Wen,et al.  One size should not fit all: advancing toward personalized glioblastoma therapy. , 2015, Discovery medicine.

[32]  Eric Stindel,et al.  Prognostic value of multimodal MRI tumor features in Glioblastoma multiforme using textural features analysis , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[33]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  A single-institution phase II trial of radiation, temozolomide, erlotinib, and bevacizumab for initial treatment of glioblastoma. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[34]  W. Mason,et al.  Pretreatment ADC Histogram Analysis Is a Predictive Imaging Biomarker for Bevacizumab Treatment but Not Chemotherapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[35]  K. Aldape,et al.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[38]  Namkug Kim,et al.  Percent change of perfusion skewness and kurtosis: a potential imaging biomarker for early treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas. , 2012, Radiology.

[39]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab: a multi-center study , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[40]  T. Batchelor,et al.  Antiangiogenic Therapy for Glioblastoma , 2012, Cancer journal.

[41]  T. Cloughesy,et al.  Graded functional diffusion map-defined characteristics of apparent diffusion coefficients predict overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[42]  M S Brown,et al.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis Stratifies Progression-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Bevacizumab-Treated Glioblastoma , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[43]  P. LaViolette,et al.  Volumetric analysis of functional diffusion maps is a predictive imaging biomarker for cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic treatments in malignant gliomas , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[44]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Phase II study of bevacizumab plus temozolomide during and after radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Imaging response criteria for recurrent gliomas treated with bevacizumab: Role of diffusion weighted imaging as an imaging biomarker , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[46]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[47]  Matthew S. Brown,et al.  Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment. , 2009, Radiology.

[48]  D. Barboriak,et al.  Repeatability of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging in patients with glioblastoma multiforme , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  Maria I. Argyropoulou,et al.  Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of current imaging modalities , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[50]  S. Nelson,et al.  Bevacizumab and chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma , 2009, Neurology.

[51]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  David J Collins,et al.  Technology Insight: water diffusion MRI—a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[53]  B. Ross,et al.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  E. Tali,et al.  Is There a Role for Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in the Differential Diagnosis of Brain Tumors? , 2006, The neuroradiology journal.

[55]  R M Weisskoff,et al.  Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[56]  M. D. de Lemos,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent brain tumours: A population-based evaluation , 2018, Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners.