Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art.

Prostate cancer is the cancer exhibiting the highest incidence rate and it appears as the second cause of cancer death in men, after lung cancer. Prostate cancer is difficult to detect, and the treatment efficacy remains limited despite the increase use of biological tests (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] dosage), the development of new imaging modalities, and the use of invasive procedures such as biopsy. Ultrasound elastography is a novel imaging technique capable of mapping tissue stiffness of the prostate. It is known that prostatic cancer tissue is often harder than healthy tissue (information used by digital rectal examination [DRE]). Two elastography techniques have been developed based on different principles: first, quasi-static (or strain) technique, and second, shear wave technique. The tissue stiffness information provided by US elastography should improve the detection of prostate cancer and provide guidance for biopsy. Prostate elastography provides high sensitivity for detecting prostate cancer and shows high negative predictive values, ensuring that few cancers will be missed. US elastography should become an additional method of imaging the prostate, complementing the conventional transrectal ultrasound and MRI. This technique requires significant training (especially for quasi-static elastography) to become familiar with acquisition process, acquisition technique, characteristics and limitations, and to achieve correct diagnoses.

[1]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[2]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Takeshi Matsumura,et al.  Real-time balloon inflation elastography for prostate cancer detection and initial evaluation of clinicopathologic analysis. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Multiparametric MRI and prostate cancer diagnosis and risk stratification , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[5]  B. S. Sidhu,et al.  Real-time elastography in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with raised PSA level. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  The impact of real-time tissue elasticity imaging (elastography) on the detection of prostate cancer: clinicopathological analysis , 2007, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  H. Wijkstra,et al.  Correlation of transrectal ultrasound, computer analysis of transrectal ultrasound and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimen , 2001, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[8]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.

[9]  Helmut Ermert,et al.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[10]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection , 2007, European Radiology.

[11]  M. Sumura,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[12]  Tristan Barrett,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with multi‐parametric MRI: Logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Y. Mizutani,et al.  The utility of transrectal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Ioan Coman,et al.  Value of ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis and management of prostate carcinoma. , 2011, Medical ultrasonography.

[16]  A. Villers,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[17]  M. Fink,et al.  Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[18]  Koji Okihara,et al.  Predictors of cancer in repeat extended multisite prostate biopsy in men with previous negative extended multisite biopsy. , 2002, Urology.

[19]  H. Hricak,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Kyung Ah Kim,et al.  Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study. , 2009, Radiology.

[21]  H. Hricak,et al.  Performance characteristics of MR imaging in the evaluation of clinically low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective study. , 2012, Radiology.

[22]  Peter Choyke,et al.  Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  E. Halpern,et al.  Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in prostate cancer , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[24]  D. Rubens,et al.  Tissue elasticity properties as biomarkers for prostate cancer. , 2008, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[25]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of anterior prostate cancer: morphometric assessment and correlation with radical prostatectomy findings , 2009, European Radiology.

[26]  Trans-rectal quantitative Shear Wave Elastrography : application to prostate cancer – A feasibility study , 2011 .

[27]  Franck Bladou,et al.  Identification of the prostate cancer index lesion by real-time elastography: considerations for focal therapy of prostate cancer , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[28]  T. Schlomm,et al.  Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.

[29]  R. Memo,et al.  Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results , 2012, Ultrasound quarterly.

[30]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Real‐time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience , 2007, BJU international.

[31]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[32]  S. Okuda,et al.  Prostate cancer screening : The clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging , 2005 .

[33]  G. Haas,et al.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects , 2009, Nature Reviews Urology.

[34]  Hashim Uddin Ahmed,et al.  Do low-grade and low-volume prostate cancers bear the hallmarks of malignancy? , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Predictors of prostate cancer after initial negative systematic 12 core biopsy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[37]  M. Remzi,et al.  When to biopsy and when to stop biopsying. , 2003, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[38]  Jie Tang,et al.  Differentiation of prostate cancer from benign lesions using strain index of transrectal real-time tissue elastography. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[39]  Olivier Rouvière,et al.  Prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with simple visual diagnostic criteria: is it reasonable? , 2007, European Radiology.

[40]  K. Nightingale,et al.  Characterizing Stiffness of Human Prostates Using Acoustic Radiation Force , 2010, Ultrasonic imaging.

[41]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastography in imaging of prostate cancer , 2007, Current opinion in urology.

[42]  B. McNeil,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Staging Early Prostate Cancer. Results of a Multi-Institutional Cooperative Trial , 1991, Investigative Radiology.

[43]  Cristian Manea,et al.  Real-time sonoelastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2011, Medical ultrasonography.

[44]  Matthew T Gettman,et al.  Reassessing the diagnostic yield of saturation biopsy of the prostate. , 2008, European urology.

[45]  L. Pallwein,et al.  Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[46]  Jie Tang,et al.  Peripheral Zone Hypoechoic Lesions of the Prostate , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[47]  Raj Persad,et al.  Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway? , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  Olivier Rouvière,et al.  Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy , 2009, European Radiology.

[49]  E. Halpern,et al.  Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. , 2007, Urology.

[50]  R. Autorino,et al.  Saturation biopsy of the prostate: why saturation does not saturate. , 2009, European urology.