Differential effects of instructional support on learning in simultation environments

This article investigates a complex Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI), of intelligence and metacognitive skill as aptitudes with structuredness of learning environment as treatment. A more structured learning environment is usually regarded as beneficial to learning in low intelligence students, whereas it may not affect or may even interfere with learning in high intelligence students. The overall analyses of four studies are presented, including a total of 99 subjects. High and low intelligence novices passed through either structured or unstructured simulation environments in the domains of heat theory, electricity, or statistics. Thinking-aloud protocols were analyzed in order to assess the metacognitive skillfulness of subjects. Several learning tests were administered, assessing both declarative and procedural domain knowledge. The results show that structuredness of learning environment did not affect learning in high intelligence subjects, irrespective of their level of metacognitive skillfulness. However, the structured learning environment yielded enhanced learning performances in low intelligence subjects with a low level of metacognitive skillfulness, while it interfered with learning in low intelligence subjects with a relatively high level of metacognitive skillfulness.

[1]  J. Elshout,et al.  Structure of Learning Environments and Individual Differences as Predictors of Learning , 1992 .

[2]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  R. Snow,et al.  Lecture 2: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Aptitude for Learning from Instruction , 1984 .

[4]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  The relevance of education , 1971 .

[5]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  A.J.M. de Jong,et al.  Learning processes of students working with a computer simulation in mechanical engineering , 1989 .

[7]  J. Elshout,et al.  Determinants of Learning in Simulation Environments across Domains , 1993 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown.  Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[9]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Qualitative models and intelligent learning environments , 1987 .

[10]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Learning Processes, Learner Attributes and Simulations. , 1991 .

[11]  Andrea A. Disessa,et al.  Artificial worlds and real experience , 1986 .

[12]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[13]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Causal Model Progressions as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[14]  J. Elshout,et al.  Thinking aloud: does it affect regulatory processes in learning? , 1993 .

[15]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Preface [Computer simulations in an instructional context] , 1991 .

[16]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[17]  R. Snow.  Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. , 1989 .

[18]  C. Hood,et al.  Education and Intelligence. , 1912 .

[19]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Problem Solving and Intelligence. , 1975 .

[20]  R. Sternberg.  Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. , 1990 .

[21]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Linking factual and procedural knowledge in solving science problems: A case study in a thermodynamics course , 1981 .

[22]  Janet G. van Hell,et al.  Using the computer as a help tool during learning by doing , 1993 .

[23]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Instructional environments for simulations. , 1991 .

[24]  Jan J. Elshout,et al.  Intellectual Ability and Working Method as Predictors of Novice Learning. , 1991 .

[25]  Gunnar C. Kunz,et al.  On-Line and Off-Line Assessment of Self-Regulation in Learning from Instructional Text and Picture. , 1989 .

[26]  J. Elshout.  Problem-solving and education. , 1987 .

[27]  J. Elshout,et al.  Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations , 1994 .

[28]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Inference and discovery in an exploratory laboratory. , 1988 .

[29]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[30]  V. Shute,et al.  Cognitive Approaches To Automated Instruction , 1992 .

[31]  van Wr Wouter Joolingen,et al.  Understanding and facilitating discovery learning in computer-based simulation environments , 1993 .

[32]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Comparison of Learning Environments: All That Glitters , 1992 .

[33]  J. Elshout,et al.  Relation between Intellectual Ability and Working Method as Predictors of Learning. , 1992 .

[34]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth of Logical Thinking , 1959 .

[35]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[36]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learning and instruction with computer simulations , 1991 .