Visually guided orientation in flies: case studies in computational neuroethology

To understand the functioning of nervous systems and, in particular, how they control behaviour we must bridge many levels of complexity from molecules, cells and synapses to perception behaviour. Although experimental analysis is a precondition for understanding by nervous systems, it is in no way sufficient. The understanding is aided at all levels of complexity by modelling. Modelling proved to be an inevitable tool to test the experimentally established hypotheses. In this review it will by exemplified by three case studies that the appropriate level of modelling needs to be adjusted to the particular computational problems that are to be solved. (1) Specific features of the highly virtuosic pursuit behaviour of male flies can be understood on the basis of a phenomenological model that relates the visual input to the motor output. (2) The processing of retinal image motion as is experienced by freely moving animals can be understood on the basis of a model consisting of algorithmic components and components which represent a simple equivalent circuit of nerve cells. (3) Behaviourally relevant features of the reliability of encoding of visual motion information can be understood by modelling the transformation of postsynaptic potentials into sequences of spike trains.

[1]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Neuronal Encoding of Visual Motion in Real-Time , 2001 .

[2]  J. Kretzberg,et al.  Temporal precision of the encoding of motion information by visual interneurons , 1998, Current Biology.

[3]  S. Arom,et al.  African polyphony and polyrhythm: Description and analysis , 1991 .

[4]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Neuronal representation of optic flow experienced by unilaterally blinded flies on their mean walking trajectories , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  Hateren,et al.  Blowfly flight and optic flow. II. Head movements during flight , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Alexander Borst,et al.  The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells: I. Passive membrane properties , 1996, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[7]  U. Ilg.  Slow eye movements , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity and Gain Control in Visual Interneurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Neuronal processing of behaviourally generated optic flow: experiments and model simulations , 2001, Network.

[10]  Shih-Chii Liu,et al.  Visuo-motor Fly-like Responses of a Robot using aVLSI Motion-sensitive Chips , 2000 .

[11]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Visual Motion and Its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze , 1992 .

[12]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Mechanisms of dendritic integration underlying gain control in fly motion-sensitive interneurons , 1995, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[13]  C. Schilstra,et al.  Stabilizing gaze in flying blowflies , 1998, Nature.

[14]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Dynamic response properties of movement detectors: Theoretical analysis and electrophysiological investigation in the visual system of the fly , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Silicon Implementation of the Fly's Optomotor Control System , 2000, Neural Computation.

[16]  J. P. Lindemann,et al.  FliMax, a novel stimulus device for panoramic and highspeed presentation of behaviourally generated optic flow , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  N. Franceschini,et al.  From insect vision to robot vision , 1992 .

[18]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Synaptic interactions increase optic flow specificity , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Performance of Fly Visual Interneurons during Object Fixation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  A Borst,et al.  Spatial distribution and characteristics of voltage-gated calcium signals within visual interneurons. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Sunny Bains.  A Machine With a Fly's-Eye View , 1999, Science.

[22]  W. Newsome,et al.  A Comparison of Spiking Statistics in Motion Sensing Neurones of Flies and Monkeys , 2001 .

[23]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  On robots and flies: Modeling the visual orientation behavior of flies , 1999, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[24]  Alexander Borst,et al.  The Intrinsic Electrophysiological Characteristics of Fly Lobula Plate Tangential Cells: III. Visual Response Properties , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Variability in spike trains during constant and dynamic stimulation. , 1999, Science.

[26]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects , 1989 .

[27]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Principles of visual motion detection , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  A. Borst,et al.  Encoding of Visual Motion Information and Reliability in Spiking and Graded Potential Neurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Hateren,et al.  Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  Michael F. Land,et al.  Visual tracking and pursuit: Humans and arthropods compared , 1992 .

[31]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Processing of Naturalistic Optic Flow , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Movement detection in arthropods. , 1993, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[33]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  How Reliably Does a Neuron in the Visual Motion Pathway of fhe Fly Encode Behaviourally Relevant Information? , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  J. Kretzberg,et al.  Reliability of a Fly Motion-Sensitive Neuron Depends on Stimulus Parameters , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  H G Krapp,et al.  Neuronal matched filters for optic flow processing in flying insects. , 2000, International review of neurobiology.

[36]  A. Borst,et al.  Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Synaptic transfer of dynamic motion information between identified neurons in the visual system of the blowfly , 2003, Neuroscience.

[38]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Membrane Potential Fluctuations Determine the Precision of Spike Timing and Synchronous Activity: A Model Study , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[39]  A. Borst,et al.  A look into the cockpit of the fly: visual orientation, algorithms, and identified neurons , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  H. Wagner.  Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica L.) II. Pursuit of targets , 1986 .

[41]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Chasing a dummy target: smooth pursuit and velocity control in male blowflies , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part I. A quantitative analysis , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[43]  W. Bialek,et al.  RELIABILITY AND STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY OF A BLOWFLY MOVEMENT-SENSITIVE NEURON , 1995 .

[44]  A Borst,et al.  Recurrent Network Interactions Underlying Flow-Field Selectivity of Visual Interneurons , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  R O Dror,et al.  Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[46]  Nicolas Franceschini,et al.  Engineering Applications of Small Brains , 1997 .

[47]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Real-Time Encoding of Motion: Answerable Questions and Questionable Answers from the Fly’s Visual System , 2000, physics/0004060.

[48]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Vision in flying insects , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Encoding of motion in real time by the fly visual system , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[50]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.