Abiotic resource use in life cycle impact assessment—Part II – Linking perspectives and modelling concepts

Starting from a lack of consensus on how to consistently assess abiotic resource use in life cycle assessment, a structured approach was developed to enable a classification of perspectives on resource use, based on the so-called role of resources. Using this classification, this paper focusses on analysing links between perspectives and modelling concepts, i.e. the conceptual implementation. To analyse the modelling concepts for a selection of existing LCIA methods and other modelling approaches, the concept of the system model is introduced. It defines the relevant inventory flows to be assessed by the LCIA method, and, at the same time, to be considered in the characterization model, and how the flows and stocks of resources used to calculate the characterization factors are positioned in relation to environment (nature) and economy (technosphere). For consistency, they should be aligned with the position of inventory flows and, at the same time, reflect the perspective on resources taken by the method. Using this concept, we critically review a selection of methods and other modelling approaches for consistency with the perspectives on resource use, as well as for their internal consistency. As a result of the analysis, we highlight inconsistencies and discuss ways to improve links between perspectives and modelling concepts. To achieve this, the new framework can be used for the development or improvement of LCIA methods on resource use.

[1]  Pilar Swart,et al.  Quantifying the impacts of primary metal resource use in life cycle assessment based on recent mining data , 2013 .

[2]  Markus Berger,et al.  Abiotic resource depletion in LCA—background and update of the anthropogenic stock extended abiotic depletion potential (AADP) model , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Alexander Cimprich,et al.  Extension of geopolitical supply risk methodology: Characterization model applied to conventional and electric vehicles , 2017 .

[4]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1999 .

[5]  Cedric Ryngaert,et al.  The set-up of an international agreement on the conservation and sustainable use of geologically scarce mineral resources , 2016 .

[6]  J. M. Brils,et al.  Abiotic flows should be inherent part of ecosystem services classification , 2016 .

[7]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Ore grade decrease as life cycle impact indicator for metal scarcity: the case of copper. , 2012, Environmental Science and Technology.

[8]  Pilar Swart,et al.  Abiotic Resource Use , 2015 .

[9]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: a critical review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[11]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Towards harmonizing natural resources as an area of protection in life cycle impact assessment , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Ilmo T. Kukkonen,et al.  Characterization of bacterial diversity to a depth of 1500 m in the Outokumpu deep borehole, Fennoscandian Shield. , 2011, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[14]  Saleem H Ali,et al.  Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance , 2017, Nature.

[15]  Zampori Luca,et al.  Feasibility study to implement resource dissipation in LCA , 2017 .

[16]  B. Reck,et al.  Six Years of Criticality Assessments: What Have We Learned So Far? , 2016 .

[17]  A. Mccabe,et al.  Sand and gravel aggregate resource management and conservation in Northern Ireland , 1999 .

[18]  T. Brady,et al.  Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—defining the path forward , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Danielle Maia de Souza,et al.  Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: A synthesis of knowledge and recommendations for biofuels , 2018 .

[21]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  David Pennington,et al.  Criticality on the international scene: quo vadis? , 2016 .

[23]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment - the EDIP-2003 methodology. Guidelines from the Danish EPA , 2004 .

[24]  M. J. Goedkoop The Eco-Indicator 98 Explained , 1998 .

[25]  M. Gavriletea Environmental Impacts of Sand Exploitation. Analysis of Sand Market , 2017 .

[26]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  The anthropogenic stock extended abiotic depletion potential (AADP) as a new parameterisation to model the depletion of abiotic resources , 2011 .

[27]  A. Shvidenko Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis , 2005 .

[28]  Friedrich Hinterberger,et al.  FORUM: Dematerialization, MIPS and Factor 10 Physical sustainability indicators as a social device , 1999 .

[29]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database , 2006 .

[30]  Nadège Troussier,et al.  Considering Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate Environmental Externalities , 2016 .

[31]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[32]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Surplus Cost Potential as a Life Cycle Impact Indicator for Metal Extraction , 2016 .

[34]  Rik Leemans,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[35]  Lucia Mancini,et al.  Potential of life cycle assessment for supporting the management of critical raw materials , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  Bengt Steen Abiotic Resource Depletion Different perceptions of the problem with mineral deposits , 2006 .

[37]  N. T. Nassar,et al.  Lost by Design. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Tom Huppertz,et al.  The Social Cost of Sub-Soil Resource Use , 2019, Resources.

[39]  G. Sonnemann,et al.  Circular economy, resource efficiency, life cycle innovation: same objectives, same impacts? , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life-cycle assessment , 1995 .

[42]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Mineral resources: Geological scarcity, market price trends, and future generations , 2016 .

[43]  P. V. Beukering,et al.  Geosystem services:A concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface , 2016 .

[44]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Background for spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment. The EDIP2003 methodology , 2004 .

[45]  Rana Pant,et al.  Rethinking the area of protection "natural resources" in life cycle assessment. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Andrea Thorenz,et al.  Import‐based Indicator for the Geopolitical Supply Risk of Raw Materials in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessments , 2016 .

[47]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Products: Volume 2: Scientific Background , 1997 .

[48]  J. Potting Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment A Framework, and Site-Dependent Factors to Assess Acidification and Human Exposure , 2000 .

[49]  Laura Schneider,et al.  Integrated method to assess resource efficiency – ESSENZ , 2016 .

[50]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2017, Nature Communications.

[51]  Bengt Steen,et al.  Describing Values in Relation to Choices in LCA (7 pp) , 2006 .

[52]  Michael R. Overcash Environmental assessment of products, volume 1‐methodology, tools, and case studies in product development. Henrik Wenzel, Michael Hauschild, and Leo Alting, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, United Kingdom, (1997), 543 pages, [ISBN No. 0‐412‐80800‐5], U.S. List Price $150.00 , 1999 .

[53]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .

[54]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  The Abiotic Depletion Potential: Background, Updates, and Future , 2016 .

[55]  Konrad Saur,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment , 1997 .