The Role of Conversational Involvement in Deceptive Interpersonal Interactions

Interpersonal Deception Theory (IDT) postulates that interactive deception differs from noninteractive deception due to combined influences of deceiver goals and social skills, mutual influence processes between sender and receiver, feedback, and interaction dynamics. An experiment tested hypotheses that (a) interactive deception displays differ from truthful ones only at the outset of interaction and approximate truthful displays over time, (b) displays are moderated by deceiver social skills, (c) deceivers adapt to receiver communication with reciprocal or compensatory displays, (d) low involvement by receivers conveys negative feedback that instigates more behavioral adjustments by deceivers than does high involvement, and (e) receivers’ postinteraction judgments of deceivers are directly related to deceiver behavioral displays. An experiment in which senders alternated between telling the truth and deceiving, and partners varied their own level of involvement, produced supportive results that have implications for the stability of, and causal mechanisms underlying, deception displays and interpersonal communication generally.

[1]  C. Segrin,et al.  Social skills deficits and psychosocial problems: antecedent, concomitant, or consequent? , 1993 .

[2]  Michael D. Miller,et al.  Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors as Afunction of Deception Type , 1994 .

[3]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  P. Ekman,et al.  Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †. , 1969, Psychiatry.

[5]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The Motivational Impairment Effect in the Communication of Deception , 1989 .

[6]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Nonverbal betrayal of feeling. , 1971 .

[7]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[8]  M. Zuckerman Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception , 1981 .

[9]  James Price Dillard,et al.  Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages , 1989 .

[10]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  The fundamental topoi of relational communication , 1984 .

[11]  R. Riggio Assessment of Basic Social Skills , 1986 .

[12]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics , 1994 .

[13]  T. Levine,et al.  When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception , 1990 .

[14]  M. Snyder Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring , 1986 .

[15]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal deception: VI. Effects of preinteractional and interactional factors on deceiver and observer perceptions of deception success , 1994 .

[16]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information , 1990 .

[17]  C. White,et al.  Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Effects of Suspicion on Communication Behaviors and Perceptions , 1996 .

[18]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  Interpersonal deception: XII. Information management dimensions underlying deceptive and truthful messages , 1996 .

[19]  James F. Roiger,et al.  Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: The Language of Interpersonal Deception , 1996 .

[20]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[21]  Joseph N Cappella,et al.  Mutual Adaptation and Relativity of Measurement , 1991 .

[22]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal Behavior , 1994 .

[23]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The voice of deceit: Refining and expanding vocal cues to deception , 1997 .

[24]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Social Skills and Deception Ability , 1987 .

[25]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Anchoring in lie detection revisited , 1987 .

[26]  David B. Buller,et al.  Interpersonal deception. I : Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing , 1991 .

[27]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[28]  Global Impressions of Social Skills: Behavioral Predictors , 1984 .

[29]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal skills in instructional contexts , 1987 .

[30]  R. Street Evaluation of noncontent speech accommodation , 1982 .

[31]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Insight into behavior displayed during deception , 1996 .

[32]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory , 1994 .

[33]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. , 1983 .

[34]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[35]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Adaptation and Communicative Design Patterns of Interaction in Truthful and Deceptive Conversations , 2001 .

[36]  Robert Hopper,et al.  Broadening the deception construct , 1984 .

[37]  A. Avramides Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[38]  B. Depaulo,et al.  The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions , 1988 .

[39]  Kathy Kellermann Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic , 1992 .

[40]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. , 1985 .

[41]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns , 1995 .

[42]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[43]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[44]  John O. Greene Production of Messages in Pursuit of Multiple Social Goals: Action Assembly Theory Contributions to the Study of Cognitive Encoding Processes , 1995 .

[45]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication , 1987 .

[46]  J. Cappella Mutual influence in expressive behavior: adult--adult and infant--adult dyadic interaction. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  M. T. Palmer,et al.  Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking , 1995 .

[48]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction , 1995 .

[49]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics , 1993 .

[50]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[51]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades , 1981 .

[52]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  R. Street Speech Convergence and Speech Evaluation in Fact-Finding Interviews , 1984 .

[54]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Behavioral violations in interactions: The combined consequences of valence and change in uncertainty on interaction outcome. , 1996 .

[56]  C. Edgley,et al.  Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy , 1975 .

[57]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Nature of Conversational Involvement and Nonverbal Encoding Patterns , 1987 .

[58]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors , 1988 .

[59]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Adaptation in Dyadic Interaction: Defining and Operationalizing Patterns of Reciprocity and Compensation , 1993 .

[60]  C. Segrin,et al.  A meta‐analytic review of social skill deficits in depression , 1990 .

[61]  M. Knapp,et al.  An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct , 1974 .

[62]  J. Guilford Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .