N-dimensional hypervolumes to study stability of complex ecosystems.

Although our knowledge on the stabilising role of biodiversity and on how it is affected by perturbations has greatly improved, we still lack a comprehensive view on ecosystem stability that is transversal to different habitats and perturbations. Hence, we propose a framework that takes advantage of the multiplicity of components of an ecosystem and their contribution to stability. Ecosystem components can range from species or functional groups, to different functional traits, or even the cover of different habitats in a landscape mosaic. We make use of n-dimensional hypervolumes to define ecosystem states and assess how much they shift after environmental changes have occurred. We demonstrate the value of this framework with a study case on the effects of environmental change on Alpine ecosystems. Our results highlight the importance of a multidimensional approach when studying ecosystem stability and show that our framework is flexible enough to be applied to different types of ecosystem components, which can have important implications for the study of ecosystem stability and transient dynamics.

[1]  Kerim Aydin,et al.  Ecopath with Ecosim as a model-building toolbox: Source code capabilities, extensions, and variations , 2016 .

[2]  Tom A. August,et al.  Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss , 2015, Nature Communications.

[3]  M. Aschan,et al.  Climate change alters the structure of arctic marine food webs due to poleward shifts of boreal generalists , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  E. Prepas,et al.  Compositional stability of boreal understorey vegetation after overstorey harvesting across a riparian ecotone , 2015 .

[5]  Sébastien Villéger,et al.  How many dimensions are needed to accurately assess functional diversity? A pragmatic approach for assessing the quality of functional spaces , 2015 .

[6]  E. Borer,et al.  Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity , 2015, Science.

[7]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Anticipating the spatio-temporal response of plant diversity and vegetation structure to climate and land use change in a protected area. , 2014, Ecography.

[8]  H. Bugmann,et al.  Temporal stability in forest productivity increases with tree diversity due to asynchrony in species dynamics. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[9]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  Are different facets of plant diversity well protected against climate and land cover changes? A test study in the French Alps. , 2014, Ecography.

[10]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Resilience in ecology: Abstraction, distraction, or where the action is? , 2014 .

[11]  Boulangeat Isabelle,et al.  FATE‐HD: a spatially and temporally explicit integrated model for predicting vegetation structure and diversity at regional scale , 2014, Global change biology.

[12]  Ben Somers,et al.  How to measure ecosystem stability? An evaluation of the reliability of stability metrics based on remote sensing time series across the major global ecosystems , 2014, Global change biology.

[13]  P. Choler,et al.  Long-term modeling of the forest-grassland ecotone in the French Alps: implications for land management and conservation. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  B. Enquist,et al.  The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .

[15]  S. Brandl,et al.  Individual-based analyses reveal limited functional overlap in a coral reef fish community. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[16]  C. Dormann,et al.  Choices of abundance currency, community definition and diversity metric control the predictive power of macroecological models of biodiversity , 2014 .

[17]  Nico Blüthgen,et al.  Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. , 2014, Ecology.

[18]  Coupling impoverishment analysis and partitioning of beta diversity allows a comprehensive description of Odonata biogeography in the Western Mediterranean , 2014, Organisms Diversity & Evolution.

[19]  Harini Nagendra,et al.  Impacts of land change on biodiversity: making the link to ecosystem services , 2013 .

[20]  Leandro da Silva Duarte,et al.  Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities , 2013 .

[21]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Plant functional traits improve diversity-based predictions of temporal stability of grassland productivity , 2013 .

[22]  D. Tilman,et al.  Predicting ecosystem stability from community composition and biodiversity. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[23]  Christian Ginzler,et al.  Driving factors of a vegetation shift from Scots pine to pubescent oak in dry Alpine forests , 2013, Global change biology.

[24]  Bastian Steudel,et al.  Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning change along environmental stress gradients. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[25]  D. Tilman,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability , 2012 .

[26]  C. Plutzar,et al.  Extinction debt of high-mountain plants under twenty-first-century climate change , 2012 .

[27]  E. Schulze,et al.  Using Plant Functional Traits to Explain Diversity–Productivity Relationships , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[29]  Tom Leinster,et al.  Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity. , 2012, Ecology.

[30]  Ottar Michelsen,et al.  Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change , 2012 .

[31]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services , 2012 .

[32]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2012 .

[33]  C. Field Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaption , 2012 .

[34]  L. Sandra,et al.  Improving plant functional groups for dynamic models of biodiversity: at the crossroads between functional and community ecology. , 2012, Global change biology.

[35]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[36]  S. Scheu,et al.  Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[37]  Eli P. Fenichel,et al.  Managing ecological thresholds in coupled environmental–human systems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  S. Biswas,et al.  Species diversity and functional diversity relationship varies with disturbance intensity , 2011 .

[39]  J. Lenoir,et al.  Forest plant community changes during 1989-2007 in response to climate warming in the Jura Mountains (France and Switzerland). , 2010 .

[40]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[41]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[42]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Ecosystem feedbacks and cascade processes: understanding their role in the responses of Arctic and alpine ecosystems to environmental change , 2009 .

[43]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[44]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[45]  B. Wilsey,et al.  Dominant Species Constrain Effects of Species Diversity on Temporal Variability in Biomass Production of Tallgrass Prairie , 2007 .

[46]  Anne-Béatrice Dufour,et al.  The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists , 2007 .

[47]  ANDREW J. KERKHOFF,et al.  The Implications of Scaling Approaches for Understanding Resilience and Reorganization in Ecosystems , 2007 .

[48]  N. Zimmermann,et al.  TreeMig: A forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale , 2006 .

[49]  S. Díaz,et al.  Biodiversity Loss Threatens Human Well-Being , 2006, PLoS biology.

[50]  O. Sun,et al.  Land use affects the relationship between species diversity and productivity at the local scale in a semi‐arid steppe ecosystem , 2006, Functional ecology.

[51]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[52]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management , 2004 .

[53]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  GRAZING SYSTEMS, ECOSYSTEM RESPONSES, AND GLOBAL CHANGE , 2004 .

[54]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[55]  K. Oleson,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics , 2003 .

[56]  D. Haydon,et al.  Alternative stable states in ecology , 2003 .

[57]  Erich Tasser,et al.  Impact of land use changes on mountain vegetation , 2002 .

[58]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[59]  W. Oechel,et al.  Observational Evidence of Recent Change in the Northern High-Latitude Environment , 2000 .

[60]  L. Gunderson Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[61]  D. Doak,et al.  The Statistical Inevitability of Stability‐Diversity Relationships in Community Ecology , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[62]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Measuring Resilience in Stochastic Systems , 1995 .

[63]  J. Downing,et al.  Biodiversity and stability in grasslands , 1996, Nature.

[64]  M. Hill,et al.  PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF TAXONOMIC DATA WITH MULTI-STATE DISCRETE CHARACTERS , 1976 .