A research model for identifying factors that drive effective decision-making and the future of work

The evolving digital transformations of organizational processes involve vast complexities. Factors such as labor resources at the individual and team levels that integrate and utilize information resources and evolving technologies to achieve collective intelligence are essential to this process. In order to better understand evolving demands of labor resources, existing research regarding worker/technology interactions for firm performance must be implemented and adapted to the changing market. This paper provides a conceptual research model enabling organizations to better understand the integration of worker/team attributes with collaboration modes, information resources and augmented technologies that yield effective collective intelligence for decision-making.,This manuscript includes a literature review on worker/team attributes interfacing with various technology platforms and the creation of collective intelligence. It then reviews complementary research including leadership elements for organizational outcomes and introduces more current work involving a digital transformation. The literature review provides the underpinnings for a conceptual model that incorporates essential elements for the creation of collective intelligence for decision-making and adds factors that are relevant for digital transformations. These elements include augmented technologies including cognitive technologies, collaborative platforms and worker attributes (skills, social sensitivity, leadership) all of which illustrate components of intellectual capital.,The paper summarizes key findings of existing research in worker/team interactions with technology platforms on organizational performance and provides an applied, conceptual research model incorporating these findings, along with new elements in the digital era for better identifying new worker requirements.,The value of this work is the introduction of an applied conceptual model based on established literature findings that includes new technologies (e.g. cognitive technologies), collaboration modes and worker/team attributes to address the requirements of the evolving knowledge worker in the digital era. It provides a framework to better understand more optimal resource allocations for the creation of collective intelligence and integrates the model components within an intellectual capital framework.

[1]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Not As Smart As We Think: A Study of Collective Intelligence in Virtual Groups , 2016, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Giovanni Schiuma,et al.  Managing intellectual capital dimensions for organizational value creation , 2014 .

[3]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams , 2003 .

[4]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Manuel J. Cobo,et al.  30 years of intelligence models in management and business: A bibliometric review , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Leif Edvinsson,et al.  Some perspectives on intangibles and intellectual capital 2000 , 2000 .

[8]  N. Bontis Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models , 1998 .

[9]  Anita Friis Sommer,et al.  Agile Transformation at LEGO Group , 2019, Research-Technology Management.

[10]  Anne Powell,et al.  Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[11]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[12]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key , 2017 .

[13]  K. Jain,et al.  A new framework to understand the technological innovation process , 2006 .

[14]  Stephanie A. Pink-Harper Educational Attainment , 2015 .

[15]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[16]  A. Woolley,et al.  Collective Intelligence and Group Performance , 2015 .

[17]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[18]  Y. Badir,et al.  The impact of intellectual capital on innovation generation and adoption , 2016 .

[19]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Effects of Four Modes of Group Communication on the Outcomes of Software Requirements Determination , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[21]  Stephan Kudyba,et al.  The productivity pay‐off from effective allocation of IT and non‐IT labour , 2004 .

[22]  Saul J. Berman,et al.  The next digital transformation: from an individual-centered to an everyone-to-everyone economy , 2014 .

[23]  Nicole A. Steckler,et al.  Building team leader effectiveness: A diagnostic tool , 1995 .

[24]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Effects of Distributed Group Support and Process Structuring on Software Requirements Development Teams: Results on Creativity and Quality , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Rosalie J. Ocker,et al.  Communication differences in virtual design teams: findings from a multi-method analysis of high and low performing experimental teams , 2008, DATB.

[26]  Michal Jerzmanowski,et al.  Total Factor Productivity Differences: Appropriate Technology vs. Efficiency , 2007 .

[27]  L. Chidambaram,et al.  Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[28]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Beyond Brainstorming: Exploring Convergence in Teams , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..