A Canonical Normal SBLI Flow Relevant to External Compression Inlets

The normal shock wave / boundary layer interaction (normal SBLI) is important to the operation and performance of a supersonic inlet, and the normal SBLI is particularly prominent in external compression inlets. To improve our understanding of such interactions, it is helpful to make use of fundamental flows which capture the main elements of inlets, without resorting to the level of complexity and system integration associated with full-geometry inlets. In this paper, several fundamental fiow-fleld configurations have been considered as possible test cases to represent the normal SBLI aspects found in typical external compression inlets, and it was found that the spillage-diffuser more closely retains the basic flow features of an external compression inlet than the other configurations. In particular, this flow-fleld allows the normal shock Mach number as well as the amount and rate of subsonic diffusion to be all held approximately constant mid independent of the application of flow control. In addition, a survey of several external compression inlets was conducted to quantify the flow and geometric parameters of the spillage-diffuser relevant to actual inlets. The results indicated that such a flow may be especially relevant if the terminal Mach number is about 1.3 to 1.4, the confinement parameter is around 10%, the width around twice or three times the height, and with the area expansion just downstream of the shock on the conservative side of the stall limit for incompressible diffusers. © 2013 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved.

[1]  Stefanie M. Hirt,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Normal Shock Boundary-Layer Interaction with Hybrid Flow Control , 2012 .

[2]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Vortex Generators for a Normal Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction with a Downstream Diffuser , 2012 .

[3]  E. Loth Smart mesoflaps for control of shock boundary layer interactions , 2000 .

[4]  J. L. Mark,et al.  Research on a two-dimensional inlet for a supersonic V/STOL propulsion system. Appendix A , 1984 .

[5]  J. E. Calogeras,et al.  Wind tunnel investigation of techniques for reducing cowl drag of an axisymmetric external-compression inlet at Mach 2.49 , 1968 .

[6]  L. W. Gertsma,et al.  Performance of variable two-dimensional inlet designed for engine-inlet matching I - Performance at Design Mach Number of 3.07 , 1956 .

[7]  James R. DeBonis,et al.  Micro-Ramps for External Compression Low-Boom Inlets , 2009 .

[8]  J. W. Kooi Influence of free-stream Mach number on transonic shock-wave boundary-layer interaction , 1978 .

[9]  H. Babinsky,et al.  Microramp Control of Supersonic Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions , 2009 .

[10]  Eric Loth,et al.  Detached Eddy Simulations of a Low-Boom Inlet , 2012 .

[11]  Bobby W. Sanders,et al.  Role of CFD in the Aerodynamic Design and Analysis of the Parametric Inlet , 2005 .

[12]  D. Mccormick,et al.  Shock/boundary-layer interaction control with vortex generators and passive cavity , 1993 .

[13]  F. Billig,et al.  Structure of Shock Waves in Cylindrical Ducts , 1973 .

[14]  Arthur Fage,et al.  Shock-wave and boundary-layer phenomena near a flat surface , 1947, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  B. Stratford An experimental flow with zero skin friction throughout its region of pressure rise , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Robert C Campbell Performance of a supersonic ramp inlet with internal boundary-layer scoop , 1954 .

[17]  Yeol Lee,et al.  Shock-Position Sensitivity and Performance of SBLI Passive-Control Methods , 2001 .

[18]  Martin Morris,et al.  Experimental investigation of normal-shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions with and without mass removal , 1990 .

[19]  Leonard J Obery,et al.  Pressure Recovery, Drag, and Subcritical Stability Characteristics of Three Conical Supersonic Diffusers at Stream Mach Numbers From 1.7 to 2.0 , 1952 .

[20]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions , 2014 .

[21]  B. H. Anderson,et al.  Performance of Three Isentropic All Internal Compression Axisymmetric Inlets Designed for Mach 2.5 , 1960 .

[22]  Erik Kroeker,et al.  Microramp Flow Control of Normal Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions , 2010 .

[23]  L. Surber,et al.  Survey of inlet development for supersonic aircraft , 1983 .

[24]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Performance and Design of Straight, Two-Dimensional Diffusers , 1967 .

[25]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Corner separation effects for normal shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions in rectangular channels , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  N. Rott,et al.  Investigations of Compression Shocks and Boundary Layers in Gases Moving at High Speed , 1947 .

[27]  L. Squire,et al.  An investigation of shock/boundary-layer interactions on curved surfaces at transonic speeds , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  Jean Delery,et al.  Shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction and its control , 1985 .

[29]  Donald C. Howe,et al.  Wind Tunnel Testing of an Axisymmetric Isentropic Relaxed External Compression Inlet at Mach 1.97 Design Speed , 2007 .

[30]  P. Doerffer,et al.  Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interaction Control by Streamwise Vortices , 2003 .

[31]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Micro-vortex generator flow control for supersonic engine inlets , 2007 .

[32]  J. Dutton,et al.  Aerodynamics of recirculating flow control devices for normal shock/boundary-layer interactions , 2006 .

[33]  Piotr Doerffer,et al.  Reynolds number effect on separation structures at normal shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction , 1989 .

[34]  J. Syberg,et al.  Performance variations in high aspect ratio subsonic diffusers due to geometric constraints in supersonic tactical aircraft inlet installations , 1980 .

[35]  F. Motallebi,et al.  Effect of Submerged Vortex Generators on Shock-Induced Separation in Supersonic Flow , 2009 .

[36]  F. White Viscous Fluid Flow , 1974 .

[37]  J Calvin Lovell,et al.  Investigation of translating-double-cone axisymmetric inlets with cowl projected areas 40 and 20 percent of maximum at Mach numbers from 3.0 to 2.0 , 1957 .

[38]  L. A. Povinelli An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Axisymmetric Diffusers , 1976 .