A Psychophysical Examination of Swinging Rooms, Cylindrical Virtual Reality Setups, and Characteristic Trajectories

Virtual Reality (VR) is increasingly being used in industry, medicine, entertainment, education, and research. It is generally critical that the VR setups produce behavior that closely resembles real world behavior. One part of any task is the ability to control our posture. Since postural control is well studied in the real world and is known to be strongly influenced by visual information, it is an ideal metric for examining the behavioral fidelity of VR setups. Moreover, VR-based experiments on postural control can provide fundamental new insights into human perception and cognition. Here, we employ the "swinging room paradigm" to validate a specific VR setup. Furthermore, we systematically examined a larger range of room oscillations than previously studied in any single setup. We also introduce several new methods and analyses that were specifically designed to optimize the detection of synchronous swinging between the observer and the virtual room. The results show that the VR setup has a very high behavioral fidelity and that increases in swinging room amplitude continue to produce increases in body sway even at very large room displacements (+/- 80 cm). Finally, the combination of new methods proved to be a very robust, reliable, and sensitive way of measuring body sway.

[1]  A. Edwards,et al.  Body sway and vision. , 1946, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  M. Guerraz,et al.  Influence of motion parallax in the control of spontaneous body sway , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  J. Lishman,et al.  The Autonomy of Visual Kinaesthesis , 1973, Perception.

[4]  C. Gielen,et al.  Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  David N. Lee Visual proprioceptive control of stance , 1975 .

[6]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical evaluation of animated facial expressions , 2005, APGV '05.

[7]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants , 1974 .

[8]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Rehabilitative environments for attention and movement disorders , 1997, CACM.

[9]  Ann McNamara Exploring perceptual equivalence between real and simulated imagery , 2005, APGV '05.

[10]  Michael Recce,et al.  A virtual reality-based exercise program for stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Assets '00.

[11]  Benoît G. Bardy,et al.  Postural Responses to Two Technologies for Generating Optical Flow , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  The role of visual factors in the maintenance of body-balance. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of field of view on balance in an immersive environment , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[14]  G Franz,et al.  veLib Reference Manual: Library Version 1.2.0 , 2005 .

[15]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing of Interceptive Action , 1985 .

[16]  H A WITKIN,et al.  Visual factors in the maintenance of upright posture. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Postural control and co-ordination disorders: The swinging room revisited , 1998 .

[18]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Human-Centred Fidelity Metrics for Virtual Environment Simulations , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[19]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Postural adjustments induced by simulated motion of differently structured environments , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.