Improving quality control through chance constrained programming: A case study using Bailey method

Abstract Worldwide it is an accepted practice that guidelines regarding aggregate gradation to be adopted for any asphalt concrete mixture are recommended by transportation agencies. In general, these specifications are based on past experience and knowledge about local conditions. Alternatively, Bailey method of mixture design considers actual aggregate properties (like shape, density, packing characteristics) while deciding aggregate gradation. Such a mechanistic approach guarantees better mixture performance. As a single source of aggregate cannot meet requirements at all sieve sizes, aggregates from different sources have to be combined to achieve target gradation. Currently used deterministic optimization approaches for aggregate blending use mean values. This leads to a situation where resultant gradation is beyond specification limits occasionally. Alternatively, stochastic optimization approaches consider inherent gradation variability while arriving at final blending proportions. The present work describes a novel chance constrained programming approach that minimizes overall cost of mixture while considering quality control issues. The proposed chance constrained programming approach offers flexibility of introducing various gradation limits as well as Bailey ratio constraints simultaneously. The proposed methodology is validated using Monte Carlo’s simulation approach. The simulation results indicated that mixtures blended using chance constrained approach produce less number of failures when compared to deterministic approach. This is due to the fact that inherent material variability is considered during blend optimization. The proposed work offers advantages of producing asphalt concrete mixtures at lower cost while having better quality control.

[1]  Ü. Sakalli,et al.  Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  A. Charnes,et al.  Chance-Constrained Programming , 1959 .

[3]  C. Panne,et al.  Minimum-Cost Cattle Feed Under Probabilistic Protein Constraints , 1963 .

[4]  Henrikas Sivilevičius INFLUENCE OF HOMOGENEITY OF MINERAL MATERIALS' GRADING AND DOSING ERRORS ON THE STABILITY OF ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURE COMPOSITION , 2003 .

[5]  J. Craus,et al.  Effects of Some Aggregate and Filler Characteristics on Behavior and Durability of Asphalt Paving Mixtures , 1996 .

[6]  Eyad Masad,et al.  Internal Structure Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Using Image Analysis , 1999 .

[7]  Donald L. Neumann Mathematical Method for Blending Aggregates , 1964 .

[8]  K. M. Lum,et al.  Design and Performance of Stone Mastic Asphalt , 2006 .

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Chance Constraints and Normal Deviates , 1962 .

[10]  M. Kumral Application of chance-constrained programming based on multi-objective simulated annealing to solve a mineral blending problem , 2003 .

[11]  P E Sebaaly,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF AGGREGATE GRADATION ON PERMANENT DEFORMATION OF ASPHALT CONCRETE , 1993 .

[12]  Y. Cengiz Toklu,et al.  Aggregate Blending Using Genetic Algorithms , 2005 .

[13]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The use of constrained and unconstrained optimization models in gradation design of hot mix asphalt mixture , 2011 .

[14]  Hui Li,et al.  Micromechanical characteristics of aggregate particles in asphalt mixtures , 2015 .

[15]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  The Bailey method of gradation evaluation: the influence of aggregate gradation and packing characteristics on voids in the mineral aggregate , 2001 .

[16]  L. R. Shaffer,et al.  Blending Natural Earth Deposits for Least Cost , 1961 .

[17]  Alex P. Alex,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve optimization problems in construction , 1999 .

[18]  Henrikas Sivilevičius,et al.  Stochastic simulation of the influence of variation of mineral material grading and dose weight on the homogeneity of hot-mix asphalt , 2008 .

[19]  William Robert Vavrik Asphalt Mixture Design Concepts to Develop Aggregate Interlock , 2000 .

[20]  Said M. Easa,et al.  Optimization model for aggregate blending , 1985 .

[21]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  Aggregate Blending for Asphalt Mix Design: Bailey Method , 2002 .

[22]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Gradation Effects Influencing Mechanical Properties of Aggregate Base–Granular Subbase Materials in Minnesota , 2012 .

[23]  Kwame Awuah-Offei,et al.  Aggregate Cost Minimization in Hot-Mix Asphalt Design , 2011 .

[24]  Said M. Easa,et al.  Stochastic Priority Model for Aggregate Blending , 1985 .

[25]  Roberto Montemanni,et al.  Aggregate Blending via Robust Linear Programming , 2012 .

[26]  Said M. Easa,et al.  Aggregate Blending Using Fuzzy Optimization , 2012 .

[27]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Coal blending optimization under uncertainty , 1995 .

[28]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Modeling methods for managing raw material compositional uncertainty in alloy production , 2007 .

[29]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Chance Constrained Aggregate Blending , 1983 .

[30]  A. Charnes,et al.  Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing under Chance Constraints , 1963 .