Unleash Physical Limitations: Virtual Emergency Preparedness Planning Simulation Training, Methodology and a Case Study

Simulation is perhaps the most widely used method for training emergency management workers. Despite its wide application, traditional simulation suffers from several constraints and limitations, which motivate us to pursue a different way – virtual simulation, as an alternative and supplement for the traditional training method. Utilization of groupware, network, and other information technologies makes virtual simulation more flexible and easier to prepare. Although virtual simulation can overcome some of the constraints related to physical simulation, so far there are little evidences that this new method can achieve similar or even better training effects compared with traditional simulation training method. To test the effects of this new training approach and the methodology to run it, several pilot trials have been conducted in the U.S. and Europe. This article is an exploratory study of a pilot emergency preparedness planning virtual simulation conducted in NJIT in late 2004. This study will help us understand the nature of virtual simulation, and help us improve the theories and designs of virtual simulation for emergency preparedness.

[1]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  Using scenarios to systematically support goal-directed elaboration for information system requirements , 1996, Proceedings IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems.

[2]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Effect of Mental Practice on Performance in a Sequential Reaction Time Task , 2000, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  Nancy L. Douglas ENEMIES OF CRITICAL THINKING: LESSONS FROM SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH , 2000 .

[4]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  D. Collins,et al.  Mental practice, motor performance, and the late CNV , 2004 .

[7]  E. Borodzicz,et al.  Individual and Group Learning in Crisis Simulations , 2002 .

[8]  Carolyn Copper,et al.  Does mental practice enhance performance , 1994 .

[9]  Marieke Kleiboer,et al.  Simulation Methodology for Crisis Management Support , 1997 .

[10]  Xiang Yao,et al.  Crisis planning via scenario development gaming , 2005 .

[11]  Xiang Yao,et al.  The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (DERMIS) , 2004 .

[12]  Bertrand Robert,et al.  A New Approach to Crisis Management , 2002 .

[13]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[14]  Pierre Wack,et al.  Scenarios designed to improve decision making , 1994 .

[15]  Jos A. Rijpma,et al.  From Deadlock to Dead End: The Normal Accidents‐ High Reliability Debate Revisited , 2003 .

[16]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Groupware concept mapping techniques , 1994, SIGDOC '94.