The STAR common metrics approach to the WFD intercalibration process: Full application for small, lowland rivers in three European countries

Class boundaries of three European assessment systems based on macroinvertebrates were compared and harmonized. Three different approaches to comparison, one based on regression analysis and the other two on statistical testing, were described and used, however only one was considered useful for the harmonization of boundaries. In all cases, the calculations were based on a set of six Intercalibration Common Metrics, combined into a simple multimetric index (ICMi). The ICMi was calculated for three test datasets from Italy, Poland and the UK, all belonging to the same stream type (small lowland siliceous sand rivers). For comparison, a regression model was employed to convert national assessment boundary values into ICMi values. The ICMi was also calculated on samples included in a strictly WFD-compliant benchmark dataset. The values of the ICMi obtained for the quality classes Good and High for the test and benchmark datasets were statistically compared. When significant differences were observed in the harmonization phase, the boundaries of the national method were refined until no further differences were observed. For the test datasets and assessment systems of Italy (IBE index) and Poland (Polish BMWP index) small refinements of the boundaries between High/Good and Good/Moderate classes were sufficient to remove the differences from the benchmark dataset. After harmonization, in the studied stream type, the percentage of samples requiring restoration to Good quality increased by 22 and 6% for Italy and Poland, respectively. For the UK dataset (EQI ASPT) the comparison to benchmark dataset showed no significant differences, thus no harmonization was proposed. A general discussion of the options used to compare boundaries based on the ICMi and their potential for harmonization is provided. Lastly, the option of harmonizing class boundaries through comparison to an external, benchmarking dataset and then re-setting them until no differences are found is supported.

[1]  P. Logan.  Ecological quality assessment of rivers and integrated catchment management in England and Wales , 2001 .

[2]  Armin K Zenker,et al.  Multimetric assessment of data provided by water managers from Germany: assessment of several different types of stressors with macrozoobenthos communities , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  The AQEM Multimetric System for the Southern Italian Apennines: Assessing the Impact of Water Quality and Habitat Degradation on Pool Macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean Rivers , 2004 .

[4]  Influenza di alcuni fattori ambientali sulla composizione delle cenosi macrobentoniche dei corsi d'acqua planiziali minori , 2003 .

[5]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Establishing reference conditions for European streams , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  O. Moog,et al.  A stressor specific multimetric approach for monitoring running waters in Austria using benthic macro-invertebrates , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  Leonard Sandin,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Running Waters in Europe , 2004, Developments in Hydrobiology.

[8]  I. Antunes,et al.  Assessment methodology for southern siliceous basins in Portugal , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  J. F. Wright,et al.  Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters , 1995 .

[10]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[11]  Peter Haase,et al.  The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  D. Helsel,et al.  Statistical methods in water resources , 2020, Techniques and Methods.

[13]  W van de Bund,et al.  Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe--interpretation and harmonisation of the concept. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  The Development of a System to Assess the Ecological Quality of Streams Based on Macroinvertebrates – Design of the Sampling Programme within the AQEM Project , 2003 .

[15]  A. Rallo,et al.  Comparison of several biological indices based on river macroinvertebrate benthic community for assessment of running water quality , 1992 .

[16]  O. Moog,et al.  A Europe-wide system for assessing the quality of rivers using macroinvertebrates: the AQEM Project*) and its importance for southern Europe (with special emphasis on Italy) , 2001 .

[17]  Leonard Sandin,et al.  Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  D. Hering,et al.  Comparing macroinvertebrate indices to detect organic pollution across Europe: a contribution to the EC Water Framework Directive intercalibration , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[19]  P. Verdonschot.  Integrated ecological assessment methods as a basis for sustainable catchment management , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[20]  Christian K. Feld,et al.  A New Method for Assessing the Impact of Hydromorphological Degradation on the Macroinvertebrate Fauna of Five German Stream Types , 2004 .

[21]  R. Thorne,et al.  The response of benthic macroinvertebrates to pollution in developing countries : a multimetric system of bioassessment , 1997 .

[22]  James R. Karr,et al.  A Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) for Rivers of the Tennessee Valley , 1994 .

[23]  Karel Brabec,et al.  Assessment of organic pollution effect considering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[24]  Paulo Pinto,et al.  Assessment of temporary streams: the robustness of metric and multimetric indices under different hydrological conditions , 2004 .