Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population.

Until now, determining the sex of a recently deceased individual using the measurement of the bicondylar breadth of the femur (also known as condylar width, epicondylar breadth and distal epiphyseal breadth) raised some concerns as to accuracy because no sample of contemporary French subjects was available. In this study, a sample of 88 female and male femurs taken from recently deceased elderly French people was studied. The bones were collected from subjects who had donated their bodies to the Medical School of Nice. The mean value of the male bicondylar breadth was found to be greater than that of females (84.3mm versus 74.8mm), confirming the sexual dimorphism of this parameter. Furthermore, the results showed a 95.4% accuracy rate for sexing individuals. To date, in the French population, as in some other samples, epicondylar breadth is the single most accurate measurement of sex determination, ahead even of head diameter. A discriminant function is presented to allow sex determination from remains of the distal femur. With regard to the data available in the literature, sexual dimorphism is probably the result of both genetic and environmental factors. The comparison of our results with those of other populations shows that there are inter-population variations of the bicondylar breadth, and also intra-population variations that account for the differences in the accuracy rate of this variable for the purposes of sex determination. These findings underscore the need to re-evaluate bone measurements within various contemporary populations.

[1]  T. Nakahashi,et al.  Sex Assessment of Fragmentary Skeletal Remains , 1986 .

[2]  M Graw,et al.  Determination of sex from femora. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[3]  C. Lavelle An analysis of the human femur. , 1974, The American journal of anatomy.

[4]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the Chinese femur. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[5]  T J Beck,et al.  Does Body Size Account for Gender Differences in Femur Bone Density and Geometry? , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  F. P. Schulter-Ellis,et al.  Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of postcranial skeletal measurements. , 1979, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  L. Wu,et al.  Sex determination of Chinese femur by discriminant function. , 1989, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  J. Škavić,et al.  Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete femora: standards for contemporary Croatia. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  W. J. Bufkin The avulsive cortical irregularity. , 1971, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[10]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. , 1997, Forensic science international.

[11]  J V Taylor,et al.  Determination of sex of white femora by discriminant function analysis: forensic science applications. , 1982, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  G. Macho Anthropological evaluation of left-right differences in the femur of southern African populations. , 1991, Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur.

[13]  A. Falsetti,et al.  A new method for discriminating African-American from European-American skeletons using postcranial osteometrics reflective of body shape. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  Egle Perissinotto,et al.  Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences , 2002, British Journal of Nutrition.

[15]  C. Stojanowski,et al.  A reevaluation of the sex prediction accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter for modern individuals. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  Seungbum Koo,et al.  A Framework for the in Vivo Pathomechanics of Osteoarthritis at the Knee , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  D F Martin,et al.  Pathomechanics of knee osteoarthritis. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  S. Asala,et al.  Sex determination from the head of the femur of South African whites and blacks. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[19]  Pat Shipman,et al.  The human skeleton , 1985 .

[20]  G. Doran,et al.  The use of the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter as a sex assessor. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[21]  L. Kazis,et al.  The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. , 1987, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  D. Detmer Chronic Shin Splints , 1986 .

[23]  J V Taylor,et al.  Sex assessment of the femur: a test of a new method. , 1979, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  D. Detmer 139 CHRONIC SHIN SPLINTS (MEDIAL TIBIAL STRESS SYNDROME): CLASSIFICATION, OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT, AND LATE RESULTS , 1994 .

[25]  G. Trancho,et al.  Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant functions. Analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[26]  C. A. King,et al.  Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  M. Işcan,et al.  Medicolegal anthropology in France. , 1999, Forensic science international.

[28]  Ruma Purkait,et al.  A study of sexual variation in Indian femur. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[29]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  A simple univariate technique for determining sex from fragmentary femora: its application to a Scottish short cist population. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  G Quatrehomme,et al.  Reexamination of a measurement for sexual determination using the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a modern European population. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.