"Damned by faint praise": A Bayesian account

“Damned by Faint Praise” is the phenomenon whereby weak positive information leads to a negative change in belief. However, in a Bayesian model of belief revision positive information can seemingly only exert a positive change in belief. We introduce a version of Bayes’ Theorem incorporating the concept of epistemic closure. This reformalization is able to predict the conditions under which a ‘damned by faint praise’ effect is observed. Moreover, good, parameter-free fits are observed between the Bayesian model and the experimental data. This provides further support for the Bayesian approach to informal argumentation (e.g., Hahn & Oaksford, 2007).

[1]  Lola L. Lopes.  Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian inference , 1985 .

[2]  R. Cattell,et al.  Formal representation of human judgment , 1968 .

[3]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , 2003 .

[4]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Conservatism in human information processing , 1982 .

[5]  M. Oaksford,et al.  How Convinced Should We Be by Negative Evidence , 2005 .

[6]  H Gu,et al.  The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[7]  M. Oaksford,et al.  The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. , 2007, Psychological review.

[8]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  M. Birnbaum,et al.  Source Credibility in Social Judgment : Bias , Expertise , and the Judge ' s Point of View , 1979 .

[10]  A. Diederich,et al.  Evaluating and Combining Subjective Probability Estimates , 1997 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[12]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Model evaluation using grouped or individual data , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  M. Oaksford,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[14]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Bayesian Inference : Combining Base Rates With Opinions of Sources Who Vary in Credibility , 2005 .

[15]  Craig R. M. McKenzie,et al.  When negative evidence increases confidence: change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute , 2002 .

[16]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .