Heavy use of equations impedes communication among biologists

Most research in biology is empirical, yet empirical studies rely fundamentally on theoretical work for generating testable predictions and interpreting observations. Despite this interdependence, many empirical studies build largely on other empirical studies with little direct reference to relevant theory, suggesting a failure of communication that may hinder scientific progress. To investigate the extent of this problem, we analyzed how the use of mathematical equations affects the scientific impact of studies in ecology and evolution. The density of equations in an article has a significant negative impact on citation rates, with papers receiving 28% fewer citations overall for each additional equation per page in the main text. Long, equation-dense papers tend to be more frequently cited by other theoretical papers, but this increase is outweighed by a sharp drop in citations from nontheoretical papers (35% fewer citations for each additional equation per page in the main text). In contrast, equations presented in an accompanying appendix do not lessen a paper’s impact. Our analysis suggests possible strategies for enhancing the presentation of mathematical models to facilitate progress in disciplines that rely on the tight integration of theoretical and empirical work.

[1]  S. Hawking A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes , 1988 .

[2]  James Gibbons Do not throw equations out with the theory bathwater , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Simon A Levin,et al.  Towards the marriage of theory and data , 2012, Interface Focus.

[4]  Benjamin M. Bolker,et al.  Ecological Models and Data in R , 2008 .

[5]  H. Caswell THEORY AND MODELS IN ECOLOGY: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE , 1988 .

[6]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[7]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[8]  R. May Uses and Abuses of Mathematics in Biology , 2004, Science.

[9]  Andrew D Fernandes,et al.  No evidence that equations cause impeded communication among biologists , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  On the Practice of Ecology , 1995 .

[11]  L. Prior,et al.  Ecological Models and Data in R , 2011 .

[12]  W. Bialek,et al.  Introductory Science and Mathematics Education for 21st-Century Biologists , 2004, Science.

[13]  G. White,et al.  Analysis of Frequency Count Data Using the Negative Binomial Distribution , 1996 .

[14]  M. R. R A U Pa C H,et al.  Model – data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation : methods , data requirements and data uncertainty specifications , 2005 .

[15]  J. Pulido A Brief History of Time From the Big Bang to Black Holes , 1988 .

[16]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Mathematical and theoretical ecology: linking models with ecological processes , 2012, Interface Focus.

[17]  S. Elena,et al.  New experimental and theoretical approaches towards the understanding of the emergence of viral infections , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Hanna Kokko Modelling for Field Biologists and Other Interesting People , 2007 .

[19]  Rudolph A. Marcus,et al.  Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment , 1993 .

[20]  T. Tregenza,et al.  The way the world might be , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[21]  J. Aeystoe Recent trends in the determination of nuclear masses , 2005 .

[22]  D. Mock,et al.  Parent-offspring conflict: A case of arrested development. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  J. Koricheva,et al.  What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Nakul Chitnis,et al.  Mathematical illiteracy impedes progress in biology , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Adam Kane A suggestion on improving mathematically heavy papers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Shaun Quegan,et al.  Model–data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation: methods, data requirements and data uncertainty specifications , 2005 .

[28]  Robert N. Brandon,et al.  Theory and experiment in evolutionary biology , 1994, Synthese.

[29]  Jay Odenbaugh,et al.  Idealized, Inaccurate but Successful: A Pragmatic Approach to Evaluating Models in Theoretical Ecology , 2005 .

[30]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  5. Renewing the Dialogue between Theory and Experiments in Population Ecology , 1989 .