The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9)

This article studies publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in Flanders and Norway using two databases that both cover all SSH peer-reviewed journal articles by university scholars for the period 2005--9. The coverage of journal articles by the Web of Science (WoS) and the proportion of articles published in English are studied in detail applying the same methodologies to both databases. The study of WoS coverage and language use is chosen because the performance-based funding systems that are in place in both countries have given different emphasis to publishing in WoS covered journals. The results show very similar, almost identical evolutions in the use of English as a publication language. The proportion of articles covered by the WoS, however, is stable for Norway but has increased rapidly for Flanders. This finding shows that the parameters used in a performance-based funding system may influence the publishing patterns of researchers. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

[1]  D. Hicks.  Performance-based university research funding systems , 2012 .

[2]  Eric H. J. Spruyt,et al.  Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[3]  Olle Persson,et al.  Field normalized citation rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds , 2012, Scientometrics.

[4]  Xiangdong Wei,et al.  Piece rates for professors , 2011 .

[5]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers' output: The case of the Érudit journal platform , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Research funding systems in Australia, New Zealand and the UK: policy settings and perceived effects , 2011 .

[7]  Laura Cruz-Castro,et al.  Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance , 2011, Scientometrics.

[8]  Bruno Meeus,et al.  Is there a world beyond the Web of Science? Publication practices outside the heartland of academic geography , 2010 .

[9]  Mika Nieminen,et al.  University research funding and publication performance--An international comparison , 2010 .

[10]  J. Schneider.  An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway , 2009 .

[11]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Evidence-based bibliometrics: A decade of bibliometrics-based science policy in Flanders , 2008 .

[12]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Changing Governance of the Public Sciences , 2007 .

[13]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Evaluation Without Evaluators , 2007 .

[14]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[15]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[16]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[17]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key , 2004, Scientometrics.

[18]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[19]  T. Palva,et al.  Pages 1-19 , 2001 .