Assessing the Influence of Project Uncertainty and IT - Usage on Knowledge Integration in Software Teams

Organizational knowledge resources typically exist in specialized pockets scattered across the firm. As distributed knowledge systems, firms’ c apacity to manage their knowledge resources is linked with their ability to integrate these pockets of specialized knowledge. Firms are increasingly depending on teams to strategically consolidate their dispersed knowledge into productive outcomes. Teams i ntegrate knowledge from external sources with internal knowledge such as skills, know -how, and expertise of their members to create project outcomes. The aim of this research will be to examine how knowledge integration in software teams is influenced by project uncertainty and IT -usage.

[1]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Management of Large Software Development Efforts , 1980, MIS Q..

[2]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[3]  Jolene Galegher,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[5]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[6]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  An Attribute Space for Organizational Communication Channels , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  Team Knowledge Structures: Matching Task to Information Environment , 2003 .

[12]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Seeking Knowledge in Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Exploratory Study , 2001, ICIS.

[13]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Amrit Tiwana Affinity to infinity in peer-to-peer knowledge platforms , 2003, CACM.

[15]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation Within Software Development Groups , 1983, MIS Q..

[16]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[17]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[18]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[19]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Antecedents of Information Systems Development Capability in Firms: A Knowledge Integration Perspective , 2003, ICIS.

[20]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[22]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[24]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[26]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[27]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Software Project Coordination , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[29]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[30]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[31]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[32]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[33]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[34]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[35]  Gary F. Templeton,et al.  Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning Construct , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[37]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[38]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[39]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..