A Hybrid Stochastic-Deterministic Approach For Active Fault Diagnosis Using Scenario Optimization

Abstract Active fault diagnosis can improve the diagnosability of potential faults by injecting a suitable input into the system. This input can be designed using either a stochastic or a deterministic framework. The stochastic approach aims to maximize the probability of a correct diagnosis at a certain time, whereas the deterministic approach aims to guarantee diagnosis within a certain time interval. Recently, a hybrid stochastic-deterministic approach has been developed in which all uncertainties are described by uniform probability density functions (PDFs) with finite support on zonotopes. This method is able to provide a guaranteed diagnosis at a given time N, while approximately maximizing the probability of diagnosis at some earlier time M

[1]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .

[2]  Marco C. Campi,et al.  The Exact Feasibility of Randomized Solutions of Uncertain Convex Programs , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  Marco Forgione,et al.  A unified experiment design framework for detection and identification in closed-loop performance diagnosis , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[4]  Marco C. Campi,et al.  A Sampling-and-Discarding Approach to Chance-Constrained Optimization: Feasibility and Optimality , 2011, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[5]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Zonotopes as bounding volumes , 2003, SODA '03.

[6]  F. Stoican Fault tolerant control based on set-theoretic methods , 2011 .

[7]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Design of active inputs for set-based fault diagnosis , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[8]  G. Calafiore,et al.  On mixed-integer random convex programs , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[9]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  A hybrid stochastic-deterministic input design method for active fault diagnosis , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Stephen L. Campbell,et al.  Effects of feedback on active fault detection , 2012, Autom..

[11]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  Robust Model Predictive Control via Scenario Optimization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Ramine Nikoukhah,et al.  Guaranteed Active Failure Detection and Isolation for Linear Dynamical Systems , 1998, Autom..

[13]  John Lygeros,et al.  Performance Bounds for the Scenario Approach and an Extension to a Class of Non-Convex Programs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Youdong Lin,et al.  Fault Detection in Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems with Uncertain Parameters , 2008 .

[15]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Robust fault detection of non-linear systems using set-membership state estimation based on constraint satisfaction , 2012, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[16]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Optimum input design for fault detection and diagnosis: Model-based prediction and statistical distance measures , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[17]  O. Stursberg,et al.  Computing Reachable Sets of Hybrid Systems Using a Combination of Zonotopes and Polytopes , 2010 .

[18]  Ivo Pun Rolling horizon for active fault detection , 2005 .

[19]  Stephen L. Campbell,et al.  Auxiliary signal design for active failure detection in uncertain linear systems with a priori information , 2006, Autom..

[20]  M. Campi,et al.  The scenario approach for systems and control design , 2008 .