rollmatch: An R Package for Rolling Entry Matching

The gold standard of experimental research is the randomized control trial. However, interventions are often implemented without a randomized control group for practical or ethical reasons. Propensity score matching (PSM) is a popular method for minimizing the effects of a randomized experiment from observational data by matching members of a treatment group to similar candidates that did not receive the intervention. Traditional PSM is not designed for studies that enroll participants on a rolling basis and does not provide a solution for interventions in which the baseline and intervention period are undefined in the comparison group. Rolling Entry Matching (REM) is a new matching method that addresses both issues. REM selects comparison members who are similar to intervention members with respect to both static (e.g., race) and dynamic (e.g., health conditions) characteristics. This paper will discuss the key components of REM and introduce the rollmatch R package.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[2]  R J Glynn,et al.  Assessing the Comparative Effectiveness of Newly Marketed Medications: Methodological Challenges and Implications for Drug Development , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  Bruce D. Meyer.  Natural and Quasi- Experiments in Economics , 1994 .

[4]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score , 1985 .

[7]  Petra Kaufmann,et al.  Experimental And Quasi Experimental Designs For Research , 2016 .

[8]  Paul R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Balanced Risk Set Matching , 2001 .

[9]  W. G. Cochran,et al.  Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review. , 1974 .

[10]  Mark Lunt,et al.  Selecting an Appropriate Caliper Can Be Essential for Achieving Good Balance With Propensity Score Matching , 2013, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[12]  R. Glynn,et al.  Calendar time‐specific propensity scores and comparative effectiveness research for stage III colon cancer chemotherapy , 2013, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[13]  Yiyan Liu,et al.  Comparison group selection in the presence of rolling entry for health services research: Rolling entry matching , 2018, Health services research.

[14]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[15]  Daniel Westreich,et al.  Propensity score estimation : machine learning and classification methods as alternatives to logistic regression , 2010 .

[16]  A. M. Walker,et al.  An application of propensity score matching using claims data , 2005, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[17]  P. Austin,et al.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies , 2010, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[18]  Yi Sun.  New matching algorithm -- Outlier First Matching (OFM) and its performance on Propensity Score Analysis (PSA) under new Stepwise Matching Framework (SMF) , 2014 .

[19]  Rajeev Dehejia,et al.  Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  H. Cai,et al.  Optimal Caliper Width for Propensity Score Matching of Three Treatment Groups: A Monte Carlo Study , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[22]  D. Resnik.  Randomized controlled trials in environmental health research: ethical issues. , 2008, Journal of environmental health.

[23]  K. Imai,et al.  Robust Estimation of Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models , 2015 .