Optimal test design for binary response data: the example of the fish embryo toxicity test

BackgroundThe fish embryo toxicity test (FET) is an established method in toxicology research for quantifying the risk potential of environmental contaminations and other substances. The typical results of the method are the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) or the no observed effect concentration (NOEC). However, from an environmental perspective, it is most important to safely identify the concentration of the substance effect which lies above the effect under control condition (spontaneous effect). The common FET is not optimal to detect ECs for small target effects. This paper shows how to optimize the efficiency and consequently the benefit of the FET for small effects using an adequate experimental design. The approach presented here can be carried over to all test systems generating binary (yes/no) outcomes.ResultsThe experimental design has three components in this context: determination of spontaneous response, sample size calculation, and dose allocation. A strategy for all three components is proposed from which a design is given including precision requirements and makes the most effective use of the experimental effort. This strategy amounts to expanding the usual FET guidelines of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, German Institute for Standardization, or American Society for Testing and Materials by adding a planning step that adapts the test to the specific user’s need.ConclusionsFor the practical calculation of an adapted design, a newly developed software is presented as R package toxtestD. It provides a user-friendly way of developing an optimal experimental design for the FET without in-depth statistical knowledge. The programme is suited for all experimental problems involving a binary outcome and a continuous concentration.

[1]  Jens C. Otte,et al.  DanTox—a novel joint research project using zebrafish (Danio rerio) to identify specific toxicity and molecular modes of action of sediment-bound pollutants , 2010 .

[2]  Werner Wosniok,et al.  Acute toxicity of 353-nonylphenol and its metabolites for zebrafish embryos , 2009, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[3]  Robert L. Tanguay,et al.  Toxicity of chlorine to zebrafish embryos. , 2014, Diseases of aquatic organisms.

[4]  D. Rodbard,et al.  Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay, and physiological dose-response curves. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  T. Braunbeck,et al.  Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test? , 2009, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[6]  Shayne C. Gad Statistics and Experimental Design for Toxicologists and Pharmacologists, Fourth Edition , 2005 .

[7]  D. Moore,et al.  Estimating low toxic effects , 1997 .

[8]  Mark Crane,et al.  What level of effect is a no observed effect? , 2000 .

[9]  Rhona K. M. Smith Regulation (EC) No 764/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2015 .

[10]  P. Chapman,et al.  A warning: NOECs are inappropriate for regulatory use , 1996 .

[11]  P. Grasso Essentials of Pathology for Toxicologists , 2002 .

[12]  Jeanne Garric,et al.  Development of a zebrafish 4-day embryo-larval bioassay to assess toxicity of chemicals. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[13]  J. Hoekstra,et al.  Calculation of the EC50 and its confidence interval when subtoxic stimulus is present. , 1993, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  N. Hoeven How to measure no effect. Part III: Statistical aspects of NOEC, ECx and NEC estimates , 1997 .

[15]  Peter M Chapman,et al.  Well past time to stop using NOELs and LOELs , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[16]  U. Kammann,et al.  Toxic Effects of Brominated Indoles and Phenols on Zebrafish Embryos , 2006, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[17]  Shayne C. Gad,et al.  Statistics and Experimental Design for Toxicologists and Pharmacologists , 2005 .

[18]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions. , 1970 .

[19]  Walter W Piegorsch,et al.  Benchmark Dose Analysis via Nonparametric Regression Modeling , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Michael St. J. Warne,et al.  NOEC and LOEC Data Should No Longer Be Generated or Used , 2008 .

[21]  R. Gingold,et al.  The weaker points of fish acute toxicity tests and how tests on embryos can solve some issues. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[22]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[23]  An EM Algorithm for Fitting a Four-Parameter Logistic Model to Binary Dose-Response Data , 2011, Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics.

[24]  J. Kreuger,et al.  Toxicity of 15 veterinary pharmaceuticals in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. , 2013, Aquatic toxicology.

[25]  Peter G. Fairweather,et al.  Statistical Power and Design Requirements for Environmental Monitoring , 1991 .

[26]  T. Hutchinson,et al.  Analysis of the ECETOC aquatic toxicity (EAT) database III - comparative toxicity of chemical substances to different life stages of aquatic organisms , 1998 .

[27]  D. Ratkowsky,et al.  Choosing near-linear parameters in the four-parameter logistic model for radioligand and related assays. , 1986, Biometrics.

[28]  Thomas Braunbeck,et al.  Towards an alternative for the acute fish LC(50) test in chemical assessment: the fish embryo toxicity test goes multi-species -- an update. , 2005, ALTEX.

[29]  Kenny S. Crump,et al.  Calculation of Benchmark Doses from Continuous Data , 1995 .

[30]  J P Hayes,et al.  The positive approach to negative results in toxicology studies. , 1987, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.