Context compensation in the vestibuloocular reflex during active head rotations.

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) needs to modulate its gain depending on target distance to prevent retinal slip during head movements. We investigated gain modulation (context compensation) for binocular gaze stabilization in human subjects during voluntary yaw and pitch head rotations. Movements of each eye were recorded, both when attempting to maintain gaze on a small visual target at straight-ahead in a darkened room and after its disappearance (remembered target). In the analysis, we relied on a binocular coordinate system yielding a version and a vergence component. We examined how frequency and target distance, approached here by using vergence angle, affected the gain and phase of the version component of the VOR and compared the results to the requirements for ideal performance. Linear regression analysis on the version gain-vergence relationship yielded a slope representing the influence of target proximity and an intercept corresponding to the response at zero vergence ("default gain"). The slope of the fitted relationship, divided by the geometrically required slope, provided a measure for the quality of version context compensation ("context gain"). In both yaw and pitch experiments, we found default version gains close to one even for the remembered target condition, indicating that the active VOR for far targets is already close to ideal without visual support. In near target experiments, the presence of visual feedback yielded near unity context gains, indicating close to optimal performance (retinal slip <0.4 degrees /s). For remembered targets, the context gain deteriorated but was still superior to performance in corresponding passive studies reported in the literature. In general, context compensation in the remembered target paradigm was better for vertical than for horizontal head rotations. The phase delay of version eye velocity relative to head velocity was small (approximately 2 degrees) for both horizontal and vertical head movements. Analysis of the vergence data from the near target experiments showed that context compensation took into account that the two eyes require slightly different VORs. In the DISCUSSION, comparison of the present default VOR gains and context gains with data from earlier passive studies has led us to propose a limited role for efference copies during self-generated movements. We also discuss how our analysis can provide a framework for evaluating two different hypotheses for the generation of binocular VOR eye movements.

[1]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Early components of the human vestibulo-ocular response to head rotation: latency and gain. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Joseph L. Demer,et al.  A linear canal-otolith interaction model to describe the human vestibulo-ocular reflex , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  I S Curthoys,et al.  Vertical eye position-dependence of the human vestibuloocular reflex during passive and active yaw head rotations. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  C. Gielen,et al.  Human Gaze Stabilization for Voluntary Off‐Centric Head Rotations , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G. Barnes,et al.  Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Demer,et al.  Human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex initiation: effects of acceleration, target distance, and unilateral deafferentation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Wu Zhou,et al.  Premotor commands encode monocular eye movements , 1998, Nature.

[8]  T. Mergner,et al.  Eye movements evoked by proprioceptive stimulation along the body axis in humans , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Off-centric rotation axes in natural head movements: implications for vestibular reafference and kinematic redundancy. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  H Collewijn,et al.  Gain and delay of human vestibulo-ocular reflexes to oscillation and steps of the head by a reactive torque helmet. I. Normal subjects. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  J. Demer,et al.  Human gaze stabilization during natural activities: translation, rotation, magnification, and target distance effects. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  G D Paige,et al.  Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Barnes,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in the control of head and eye movement: The role of visual feedback and predictive mechanisms , 1993, Progress in neurobiology.

[14]  R W Baloh,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in humans during active and passive, vertical head movement. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[15]  J. Demer,et al.  Mechanisms of human vertical visual-vestibular interaction. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  L. Snyder,et al.  Effect of viewing distance and location of the axis of head rotation on the monkey's vestibuloocular reflex. I. Eye movement responses. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  F. Thorn,et al.  Compensatory eye movements during active head rotation for near targets: effects of imagination, rapid head oscillation and vergence , 1987, Vision Research.

[18]  J Dichgans,et al.  Fixation suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during sinusoidal stimulation in humans as related to the performance of the pursuit system. , 1986, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[19]  T Vilis,et al.  A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  G R Barnes,et al.  The effects of visual discrimination of image movement across the stationary retina. , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  R. Tomlinson,et al.  Analysis of human vestibulo-ocular reflex during active head movements. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[22]  C Blakemore,et al.  Co‐ordination of head and eyes in the gaze changing behaviour of cats , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Schwarz Dw,et al.  Diagnostic precision in a new rotatory vestibular test. , 1979 .

[24]  D. Robinson,et al.  Voluntary, non-visual control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[25]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Precise recording of human eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[26]  E Bizzi,et al.  The role of vestibular and neck afferents during eye-head coordination in the monkey. , 1974, Brain research.

[27]  Gary D. Paige,et al.  Canal-otolith interactions in the squirrel monkey vestibulo-ocular reflex and the influence of fixation distance , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Erik S. Viirre,et al.  The human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex during combined linear and angular acceleration , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  T. Hine,et al.  Effects of asymmetric vergence on compensatory eye movements during active head rotation. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[30]  H. Collewijn The vestibulo-ocular reflex: an outdated concept? , 1989, Progress in brain research.

[31]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R. Tomlinson,et al.  Diagnostic precision in a new rotatory vestibular test. , 1979, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[33]  A J Benson,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in the control of eye movement. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.