A Non-binary Methodological Manoeuvre: Expert Quantitative and Novice Qualitative Researcher

Mann presents a reflection on her transitional learning journey from natural scientist towards engaging with education research and the struggles with consolidating a positivist ontology in a constructivist environment. Mann explores what it means to have a theoretical perspective that allows for both quantitative and qualitative inquiry through anecdotes from her own history from childhood to early career researcher. Importantly, she uses the ‘expert’ stance to highlight the similarities between the learning journey towards seemingly dichotomous methodologies, and provides insights for other novice researchers in how to navigate a non-linear and complex maze of their journey. Finally, Mann contemplates on how having a ‘non-binary’ perspective can benefit in a world where seemingly incongruent ideas and experiences overlap.

[1]  I. Epstein,et al.  Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI): Using Photos to Elicit Children's Perspectives , 2006 .

[2]  Beth Hurst,et al.  Paraphrasing for Comprehension. , 2003 .

[3]  A. Sparkes,et al.  Autoethnography and Narratives of Self: Reflections on Criteria in Action , 2000 .

[4]  B. Bicknell.  Parental Roles in the Education of Mathematically Gifted and Talented Children , 2014 .

[5]  D. Kolb.  Management and the Learning Process , 1976 .

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[7]  Keith A. Roberts,et al.  Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning , 2008 .

[8]  L. Snyder,et al.  Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills , 2008 .

[9]  K. Smith,et al.  Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers , 2008, 0802.2950.

[10]  C. E. Price.  Representing characters to computers , 1969 .

[11]  R. Bullough,et al.  Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical Forms of Self-Study Research , 2001 .

[12]  S. Wall,et al.  An Autoethnography on Learning About Autoethnography , 2006 .

[13]  H. Ansoff,et al.  Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals , 1975 .

[14]  Robin L. Cooper,et al.  Building Connections: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Qualitative Research Students’ Learning Experiences , 2012 .

[15]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Identity and agency: pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey , 2009 .

[16]  J. Lorber,et al.  Beyond the Binaries: Depolarizing the Categories of Sex, Sexuality, and Gender* , 1996 .

[17]  K. Malterud.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[18]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[19]  Philip C. Candy,et al.  Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[20]  S. Ford,et al.  An electron microscopic study of nickel sulfide inclusions in toughened glass , 2001 .

[21]  G. Kampis,et al.  The Crossroads between Biology and Mathematics: The Scientific Method as the Basics of Scientific Literacy , 2010 .

[22]  Scholar-Craftsmanship , 2013 .

[23]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[24]  Kevin A. Smith,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics , 2012, CogSci.

[25]  Richard Phillips Feynman.  What is science? , 2011 .

[26]  G. Storr,et al.  Learning the Concept of Researcher as Instrument in Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[27]  J. Hendry.  The development of attitudes to the wave-particle duality of light and quantum theory, 1900–1920 , 1980 .

[28]  Benjamin K Hoffman.  A logical treatment of special relativity, with and without faster-than-light observers , 2013, 1306.6004.

[29]  Margaret Cargill.  Transferable skills within research degrees: a collaborative genre-based approach to developing publication skills and its implications for research education , 2004 .