Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter

The speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (sABR) provides a measure of encoding complex stimuli in the brainstem, and this study employed the sABR to better understand the role of neural temporal jitter in the response patterns from older adults. In experiment 1, sABR recordings were used to investigate age-related differences in periodicity encoding of the temporal envelope and fine structure components of the response to a /da/speech token. A group of younger and a group of older adults (n = 22 per group) participated. The results demonstrated reduced amplitude of the fundamental frequency and harmonic components in the spectral domain of the recorded response of the older listeners. In experiment 2, a model of neural temporal jitter was employed to simulate in a group of young adults (n = 22) the response patterns measured from older adults. A small group of older adults (n = 7) were also tested under the jitter simulation conditions. In the young adults, the results showed a systematic reduction in the response amplitude of the most robust response components as the degree of applied jitter increased. In contrast, the older adults did not demonstrate significant response reduction when tested under jitter conditions. The overall pattern of results suggests that older adults have reduced neural synchrony for encoding periodic, complex signals at the level of the brainstem, and that this reduced synchrony can be modeled by simulating neural jitter via disruption of the temporal waveform of the stimulus.

[1]  P W Alberti,et al.  Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  Erika Skoe,et al.  Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives , 2010, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[3]  B A Schneider,et al.  The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Ewen MacDonald,et al.  Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging , 2007, Hearing Research.

[5]  M. Bergman Aging and the perception of speech , 1980 .

[6]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  C. Fowler,et al.  Amplitude-modulated auditory steady-state responses in younger and older listeners. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  Judy R Dubno,et al.  Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P. Divenyi,et al.  Hearing in aging: issues old and young , 1999 .

[10]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Processing: Implications for Speech Perception , 2001 .

[11]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  The Frequency Following Response (FFR) May Reflect Pitch-Bearing Information But is Not a Direct Representation of Pitch , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[12]  T. Picton,et al.  Physiological detection of interaural phase differences. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Temporally jittered speech produces performance intensity, phonetically balanced rollover in young normal-hearing listeners. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[14]  M. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[16]  N. Kraus,et al.  Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D. T. Ives,et al.  Age-Related Difference in Melodic Pitch Perception Is Probably Mediated by Temporal Processing: Empirical and Computational Evidence , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[18]  Kathy R Vander Werff,et al.  Brain Stem Responses to Speech in Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[19]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[21]  Ewen N. MacDonald,et al.  Word Recognition for Temporally and Spectrally Distorted Materials: The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[22]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Grose,et al.  Electrophysiological Measurement of Binaural Beats: Effects of Primary Tone Frequency and Observer Age , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[24]  B. Schneider,et al.  Effects on speech intelligibility of temporal jittering and spectral smearing of the high-frequency components of speech , 2010, Hearing Research.

[25]  Eric W Healy,et al.  Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  John H Grose,et al.  Age Effects in Temporal Envelope Processing: Speech Unmasking and Auditory Steady State Responses , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[28]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  Report Why Middle-aged Listeners Have Trouble Hearing in Everyday Settings , 2022 .

[29]  Sara K. Mamo,et al.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: Age-related monaural and binaural effects , 2012, Hearing Research.

[30]  J. Grose,et al.  Processing of Temporal Fine Structure as a Function of Age , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[31]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[32]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: Evidence from human frequency-following response recordings , 2010, Hearing Research.

[33]  R. P. Carlyon,et al.  Subcortical Neural Synchrony and Absolute Thresholds Predict Frequency Discrimination Independently , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[34]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Methods to Eliminate Stimulus Transduction Artifact From Insert Earphones During Electroencephalography , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: a model of auditory deafferentation , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[40]  Kelly L Tremblay,et al.  Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.