Predicting water quality and ecological responses

Abstract Changes to climate are predicted to have effects on freshwater streams. Stream flows are likely to change, with implications for freshwater ecosystems and water quality. Other stressors such as population growth, community preferences and management policies can be expected to interact in various ways with climate change and stream flows, and outcomes for freshwater ecosystems and water quality are uncertain. Managers of freshwater ecosystems and water supplies could benefit from being able to predict the scales of likely changes. This project has developed and applied a linked modelling framework to assess climate change impacts on water quality regimes and ecological responses. The framework is designed to inform water planning and climate adaptation activities. It integrates quantitative tools, and predicts relationships between future climate, human activities, water quality and ecology, thereby filling a gap left by the considerable research effort so far invested in predicting stream flows. The modelling framework allows managers to explore potential changes in the water quality and ecology of freshwater systems in response to plausible scenarios for climate change and management adaptations. Although set up for the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment in southern NSW and ACT, the framework was planned to be transferable to other regions where suitable data are available. The approach and learning from the project appear to have the potential to be broadly applicable. We selected six climate scenarios representing minor, moderate and major changes in flow characteristics for 1oC and 2oC temperature increases. These were combined with four plausible alternative management adaptations that might be used to modify water supply, urban water demand and stream flow regimes in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment. The Bayesian Network (BN) model structure we used was developed using both a ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’ approach. From analyses combined with expert advice, we identified the causal structure linking climate variables to stream flow, water quality attributes, land management and ecological responses (top down). The ‘bottom up’ approach focused on key ecological outcomes and key drivers, and helped produce efficient models. The result was six models for macroinvertebrates, and one for fish. In the macroinvertebrate BN models, nodes were discretised using statistical/empirical derived thresholds using new techniques. The framework made it possible to explore how ecological communities respond to changes in climate and management activities. Particularly, we focused on the effects of water quality and quantity on ecological responses. The models showed a strong regional response reflecting differences across 18 regions in the catchment. In two regions the management alternatives were predicted to have stronger effects than climate change. In three other regions the predicted response to climate change was stronger. Analyses of water quality suggested minor changes in the probability of water quality exceeding thresholds designed to protect aquatic ecosystems. The ‘bottom up’ approach limited the framework’s transferability by being specific to the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment data. Indeed, to meet stakeholder questions models need to be specifically tailored. Therefore the report proposes a general model-building framework for transferring the approach, rather than the models, to other regions. Please cite this report as: Dyer, F, El Sawah, S, Lucena-Moya, P, Harrison, E, Croke, B, Tschierschke, A, Griffiths, R, Brawata, R, Kath, J, Reynoldson, T, Jakeman, T 2013 Predicting water quality and ecological responses, National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, pp. 110 Changes to climate are predicted to have effects on freshwater streams. Stream flows are likely to change, with implications for freshwater ecosystems and water quality. Other stressors such as population growth, community preferences and management policies can be expected to interact in various ways with climate change and stream flows, and outcomes for freshwater ecosystems and water quality are uncertain. Managers of freshwater ecosystems and water supplies could benefit from being able to predict the scales of likely changes. This project has developed and applied a linked modelling framework to assess climate change impacts on water quality regimes and ecological responses. The framework is designed to inform water planning and climate adaptation activities. It integrates quantitative tools, and predicts relationships between future climate, human activities, water quality and ecology, thereby filling a gap left by the considerable research effort so far invested in predicting stream flows. The modelling framework allows managers to explore potential changes in the water quality and ecology of freshwater systems in response to plausible scenarios for climate change and management adaptations. Although set up for the Upper Murrumbidgee River catchment in southern NSW and ACT, the framework was planned to be transferable to other regions where suitable data are available. The approach and learning from the project appear to have the potential to be broadly applicable. We selected six climate scenarios representing minor, moderate and major changes in flow characteristics for 1oC and 2oC temperature increases. These were combined with four plausible alternative management adaptations that might be used to modify water supply, urban water demand and stream flow regimes in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment. The Bayesian Network (BN) model structure we used was developed using both a ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’ approach. From analyses combined with expert advice, we identified the causal structure linking climate variables to stream flow, water quality attributes, land management and ecological responses (top down). The ‘bottom up’ approach focused on key ecological outcomes and key drivers, and helped produce efficient models. The result was six models for macroinvertebrates, and one for fish. In the macroinvertebrate BN models, nodes were discretised using statistical/empirical derived thresholds using new techniques. The framework made it possible to explore how ecological communities respond to changes in climate and management activities. Particularly, we focused on the effects of water quality and quantity on ecological responses. The models showed a strong regional response reflecting differences across 18 regions in the catchment. In two regions the management alternatives were predicted to have stronger effects than climate change. In three other regions the predicted response to climate change was stronger. Analyses of water quality suggested minor changes in the probability of water quality exceeding thresholds designed to protect aquatic ecosystems. The ‘bottom up’ approach limited the framework’s transferability by being specific to the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment data. Indeed, to meet stakeholder questions models need to be specifically tailored. Therefore the report proposes a general model-building framework for transferring the approach, rather than the models, to other regions.

[1]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[2]  THE BUSH FIRE PROBLEM IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY , 1939 .

[3]  J. Martino The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind: Dennis L. Meadows et al. Universe Books, New York. 1972, 205 pages, $6.50; paperback $2.75 , 1973 .

[4]  K. Langford,et al.  Change in yield of water following a bushfire in a forest of eucalyptus regnans , 1976 .

[5]  Arizona.,et al.  DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT , 1979 .

[6]  W. Gazey,et al.  Population Estimation from Mark‐Recapture Experiments Using a Sequential Bayes Algorithm , 1986 .

[7]  Paul Morawski,et al.  Understanding Bayesian belief networks , 1989 .

[8]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  Bayesian inference in non-replicated ecological studies , 1990 .

[9]  R. L. Olson,et al.  A framework for modeling uncertain reasoning in ecosystem management. II. Bayesian belief networks , 1990 .

[10]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Bayesian Networks without Tears , 1991, AI Mag..

[11]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  When and how to use scenario planning: A heuristic approach with illustration , 1991 .

[12]  P. Somerfield,et al.  Taxonomic levels, in marine community studies, revisited , 1995 .

[13]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRONMENTAL , 1996 .

[14]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[15]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Uncertainty and the Assessment of Extinction Probabilities , 1996 .

[16]  P. R. Wade,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Classification Criteria for Spectacled Eiders , 1996 .

[17]  Mervyn Thomas,et al.  A Novel Bayesian Approach to Assessing Impacts of Rain Forest Logging , 1996 .

[18]  M. Parsons,et al.  The effect of habitat‐specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model , 1996 .

[19]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[20]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[21]  Sakari Kuikka,et al.  Joint use of multiple environmental assessment models by a Bayesian meta-model: the Baltic salmon case , 1997 .

[22]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[23]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Additive Logistic Regression : a Statistical , 1998 .

[24]  Brian Richter,et al.  A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network , 1998 .

[25]  M. Barbour,et al.  Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton , 1999 .

[26]  B. Cade,et al.  Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles , 1999 .

[27]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. , 2000 .

[28]  J. Baron,et al.  POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SURFACE‐WATER QUALITY IN NORTH AMERICA 1 , 2000 .

[29]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[30]  B. Marcot,et al.  Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement , 2001 .

[31]  Roger Jones,et al.  Climate scenario development , 2001 .

[32]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[33]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Water in a changing world , 2001 .

[34]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[35]  W. Loh,et al.  REGRESSION TREES WITH UNBIASED VARIABLE SELECTION AND INTERACTION DETECTION , 2002 .

[36]  Henry Tirri,et al.  B-Course: A Web-Based Tool for Bayesian and Causal Data Analysis , 2002, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[37]  G. De’ath MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION TREES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING SPECIES–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[38]  A. Jakeman,et al.  Detecting changes in streamflow response to changes in non-climatic catchment conditions: farm dam development in the Murray–Darling basin, Australia , 2002 .

[39]  Lachlan T. H. Newham,et al.  Catchment Scale Modelling of Water Quality and Quantity , 2002 .

[40]  B. Cade,et al.  Influences of spatial and temporal variation on fish-habitat relationships defined by regression quantiles , 2002 .

[41]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  IMPROVED BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF METAPOPULATION DATA WITH AN APPLICATION TO A TREE FROG METAPOPULATION , 2003 .

[42]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Integrated approach to total maximum daily load development for Neuse River Estuary using bayesian probability network model (Neu-BERN) , 2003 .

[43]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Thresholds: The Key to Successful Environmental Management or an Important Concept with No Practical Application? , 2006, Ecosystems.

[44]  Nigel W. Arnell,et al.  Relative effects of multi-decadal climatic variability and changes in the mean and variability of climate due to global warming: future streamflows in Britain , 2003 .

[45]  Curtis J. Richardson,et al.  Integrating Bioassessment and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Approach to Developing Numerical Water-Quality Criteria , 2003, Environmental management.

[46]  G. Minshall Responses of stream benthic macroinvertebrates to fire , 2003 .

[47]  Song S. Qian,et al.  Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds , 2003 .

[48]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data , 1994, Machine Learning.

[49]  W. Pike MODELING DRINKING WATER QUALITY VIOLATIONS WITH BAYESIAN NETWORKS 1 , 2004 .

[50]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[51]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .

[52]  O. Bragg,et al.  DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[53]  Neville Nicholls,et al.  Climate change impacts on fire-weather in south-east Australia , 2005 .

[54]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Synthesis: Thresholds in conservation and management , 2005 .

[55]  R. Norris,et al.  Ecological Effects of Serial Impoundment on the Cotter River, Australia , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[56]  A. Huggett The concept and utility of ecological thresholds in biodiversity conservation , 2005 .

[57]  R. Koenker Quantile Regression: Quantile Regression in R: A Vignette , 2005 .

[58]  R. Shakesby,et al.  Impacts on water quality by sediments and nutrients released during extreme bushfires , 2006 .

[59]  R. Norris,et al.  Dams and Flow in the Cotter River, Australia: Effects on Instream Trophic Structure and Benthic Metabolism , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[60]  B. Marcot,et al.  A Bayesian approach to evaluating habitat for woodland caribou in north-central British Columbia. , 2006 .

[61]  C. Fernández,et al.  Changes in water yield after a sequence of perturbations and forest management practices in an Eucalyptus globulus Labill. watershed in Northern Spain , 2006 .

[62]  R. Zou,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Coupled Watershed and Water Quality Modeling Systems , 2006 .

[63]  Robert L. Wilby,et al.  Integrated modelling of climate change impacts on water resources and quality in a lowland catchment: River Kennet, UK , 2006 .

[64]  B. Bestelmeyer Threshold Concepts and Their Use in Rangeland Management and Restoration: The Good, the Bad, and the Insidious , 2006 .

[65]  B. Marcot,et al.  Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management , 2006 .

[66]  Del Meidinger,et al.  Capturing expert knowledge for ecosystem mapping using Bayesian networks , 2006 .

[67]  B. Marcot,et al.  Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation , 2006 .

[68]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Multiscale Drivers of Water Chemistry of Boreal Lakes and Streams , 2006, Environmental management.

[69]  K. Finkele,et al.  National gridded drought factors and comparison of two soil moisture deficit formulations used in prediction of Forest Fire Danger Index inAustralia , 2006 .

[70]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A Bayesian network approach for assessing the sustainability of coastal lakes in New South Wales, Australia , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[71]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[72]  Hans Thodsen,et al.  The influence of climate change on stream flow in Danish rivers , 2007 .

[73]  K. Hennessy,et al.  Bushfire weather in southeast Australia: recenttrends and projected climate change impacts , 2007 .

[74]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2007 .

[75]  Bronwyn Price,et al.  Using a Bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal – The Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi) , 2007 .

[76]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  Can an indicator of river health be related to assessments from a catchment-scale sediment model? , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[77]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Bayesian Networks and participatory modelling in water resource management , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[78]  Lesley Head,et al.  Changing cultures of water in eastern Australian backyard gardens , 2007 .

[79]  The Upper Murrumbidgee IQQM Calibration Report , 2008 .

[80]  R. Snyder,et al.  Progress on incorporating climate change into management of California’s water resources , 2008 .

[81]  Zhenming Su,et al.  Quantitative Identification of Disturbance Thresholds in Support of Aquatic Resource Management , 2008, Environmental management.

[82]  J Elith,et al.  A working guide to boosted regression trees. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[83]  Q. J. Wang,et al.  Scenarios of the future: Irrigation in the Goulburn Broken Region , 2008 .

[84]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Development of Biologically Based Sediment Criteria in Mountain Streams of the Western United States , 2008 .

[85]  Potential impacts to freshwater ecosystems caused by flow regime alteration under changing climate conditions in Taiwan , 2008 .

[86]  Carmel Pollino,et al.  Increased Use of Bayesian Network Models Will Improve Ecological Risk Assessments , 2008 .

[87]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Testing of null hypotheses in exploratory community analyses: similarity profiles and biota-environment linkage , 2008 .

[88]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[89]  J. Vaze,et al.  Estimating climate change impact on runoff across southeast Australia: Method, results, and implications of the modeling method , 2009 .

[90]  Miska Luoto,et al.  The role of local and landscape level measures of greenness in modelling boreal plant species richness , 2009 .

[91]  A. Lorenz,et al.  Vulnerable taxa of European Plecoptera (Insecta) in the context of climate change , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[92]  R. Wilby,et al.  A review of the potential impacts of climate change on surface water quality , 2009 .

[93]  J. Tu Combined impact of climate and land use changes on streamflow and water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA , 2009 .

[94]  R. Utz,et al.  Identifying regional differences in threshold responses of aquatic invertebrates to land cover gradients , 2009 .

[95]  B. Chessman Climatic changes and 13‐year trends in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages in New South Wales, Australia , 2009 .

[96]  Rebecca A. Kelly,et al.  A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[97]  Martine Maron,et al.  Bayesian networks and adaptive management of wildlife habitat. , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[98]  Carl S. Smith,et al.  Predicting a 'tree change' in Australia's tropical savannas: Combining different types of models to understand complex ecosystem behaviour , 2010 .

[99]  R. King,et al.  A new method for detecting and interpreting biodiversity and ecological community thresholds , 2010 .

[100]  Thomas F Cuffney,et al.  Responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental changes associated with urbanization in nine metropolitan areas. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[101]  Peter Davies,et al.  The Sustainable Rivers Audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia , 2010 .

[102]  Ann Louise Heathwaite,et al.  Multiple stressors on water availability at global to catchment scales: understanding human impact on nutrient cycles to protect water quality and water availability in the long term , 2010 .

[103]  Ben Stewart-Koster,et al.  The use of Bayesian networks to guide investments in flow and catchment restoration for impaired river ecosystems , 2010 .

[104]  John Bromley,et al.  Integrated water resources management of overexploited hydrogeological systems using Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[105]  B. Bates,et al.  Incorporating climate change in water allocation planning , 2010 .

[106]  Cyril O. Wilson,et al.  Simulating the impacts of future land use and climate changes on surface water quality in the Des Plaines River watershed, Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area, Illinois. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[107]  S. Jähnig,et al.  Limiting factors and thresholds for macroinvertebrate assemblages in European rivers: Empirical evidence from three datasets on water quality, catchment urbanization, and river restoration , 2012 .

[108]  Y. Jeffrey Yang,et al.  Predicting plausible impacts of sets of climate and land use change scenarios on water resources , 2012 .

[109]  R. Norris,et al.  More for less: a study of environmental flows during drought in two Australian rivers , 2012 .

[110]  M. Kennard,et al.  Bayesian network models for environmental flow decision making in the Daly River, Northern Territory, Australia , 2012 .

[111]  P. Mujumdar,et al.  Climate change induced risk in water quality control problems , 2012 .

[112]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance , 2013 .

[113]  R. Marchant,et al.  A long-term study of the factors that influence compositional stability of stream invertebrates , 2014 .