Clinical Outcomes of Women With Recurrent or Persistent Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Objectives This study aimed to identify prognostic factors influencing the outcome of recurrent or persistent uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS). Methods All patients with recurrent or persistent ULMS who underwent treatment at the participating institutions between January 2000 and December 2010 were identified from the tumor registry. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate overall survival data. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. Results One hundred fifteen (68.8%) patients who had recurrent/persistent disease were identified, 40 (34.8%) had persistent disease, and 75 (65.2%) had a recurrence. Median follow-up time was 24.9 months. The 5-year postrelapse survival rate was 15% and was not significantly different between women with recurrent or persistent disease (16% vs 13%; P = 0.1). Variables identified affecting the 5-year postrelapse survival rate included low number of mitosis at the time of diagnosis (<25, 25% vs 5%; P = 0.002), time to relapse from original diagnosis (≤6 vs >6 months, 8% vs 22%; P = 0.003)), and surgical treatment (17% vs 12%; P = 0.01). Age, stage, chemotherapy at time of original diagnosis or at the time of relapse, site of recurrence, and single versus multiple sites of recurrence were not associated with survival. In a multivariate Cox regression model, only low number of mitosis (hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3–0.8, P = 0.02) was identified as a predictor of overall survival. Conclusions The prognosis of patients with recurrent/persistent ULMS is, in general, poor. Women who have low number of mitosis at the time of diagnosis seemed to have better postrelapse survival.

[1]  E. Keung,et al.  External validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall survival in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma , 2013, Cancer.

[2]  S. George,et al.  Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: An Updated Series , 2013, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[3]  Alexia Iasonos,et al.  A nomogram to predict postresection 5‐year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma , 2012, Cancer.

[4]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  Repeated and aggressive pulmonary resections for leiomyosarcoma metastases extends survival. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  D. Timmerman,et al.  Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  J. Prat FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  J. Nesland,et al.  Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients , 2009, Histopathology.

[8]  P. Pairolero,et al.  Gynecologic cancers: factors affecting survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  T. Fujisawa,et al.  Pulmonary metastases from uterine malignancies: results of surgical resection in 133 patients. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  S. Cha,et al.  Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  A. Gadducci,et al.  Factors influencing survival in endometrial cancer relapsing patients: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study , 2003, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[12]  M. Morgan,et al.  Evaluation of paclitaxel in previously treated leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  E. Venkatraman,et al.  Surgical resection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary recurrences of uterine leiomyosarcoma. , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  A. Ansink,et al.  Recurrent cervical cancer: detection and prognosis , 2002, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  D. Tu,et al.  Factors predictive of survival after first relapse or progression in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a prediction tree analysis-derived model with test and validation groups. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[16]  Damir Babić,et al.  Prognostic parameters for survival of patients with malignant mesenchymal tumors of the uterus , 1996, Cancer.

[17]  G. Sutton,et al.  Ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  E. Moskovic,et al.  Survival, patterns of spread and prognostic factors in uterine sarcoma: a study of 76 patients. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  E. Yordan,et al.  Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1993, Cancer.

[20]  G. Sutton,et al.  Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in leiomyosarcoma ofthe uterus: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study , 1992 .

[21]  E. Yordan,et al.  Phase II trial of cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Wharton,et al.  High‐dose doxorubicin infusion therapy for disseminated mixed mesodermal sarcoma of the uterus , 1987, Cancer.

[23]  N. Weiss,et al.  The epidemiology of sarcomas of the uterus. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  J. Prat,et al.  Uterine sarcomas: a review. , 2010, Gynecologic Oncology.

[25]  R. Mannel,et al.  Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  O. Stål,et al.  Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: A clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53, and mdm-2 analysis of 49 cases. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  F. Pettersson,et al.  Prognostic factors in uterine leiomyosarcoma. A clinical and histopathological study of 143 cases. The Radiumhemmet series 1936-1981. , 1990, Acta oncologica.