Knowing What All Students Know: Procedures for Developing Universal Design for Assessment.

Universal design for assessment (UDA) is intended to increase participation of students with disabilities and English-language learners in general education assessments by addressing student needs through customized testing platforms. Computer-based testing provides an optimal format for creating individually-tailored tests. However, although a theoretical basis for universal design is well established, little practical information is available to assist test developers in creating and implementing universally designed tests. This article discusses the application of universal design to assessment and describes how these principles are applied to a test of 3rd grade mathematics ability. I present the steps involved in conceptualizing, constructing, and implementing a universally designed test in anticipation that test developers, state department assessment coordinators, and other researchers will benefit from this application. Recommendations for future research and development efforts to create accessible computer-based learning environments for all students are explored.

[1]  Robert Helwig,et al.  Reading as an Access to Mathematics Problem Solving on Multiple-Choice Tests for Sixth-Grade Students , 1999 .

[2]  C. Stansfield.  Linguistic Simplification: A Promising Test Accommodation for LEP Students?. , 2002 .

[3]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Inexorable and Inevitable: The Continuing Story of Technology and Assessment , 2002 .

[4]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Universal Design Applied to Large Scale Assessments (NCEO Synthesis Report) , 2002 .

[5]  Li Cy.  Using Computer-based Tests with Students with Disabilities ▼ , 2003 .

[6]  S. Messick.  Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment , 1989 .

[7]  Richard N. Apling.  Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) , 2002 .

[8]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  The National Center On Educational Outcomes , 1997 .

[9]  Gerald Tindal,et al.  An Oral Versus a Standard Administration of a Large-Scale Mathematics Test , 2002 .

[10]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .

[11]  Jacqueline Vischer,et al.  Design Intervention: Toward a More Humane Architecture , 1991 .

[12]  Robert P. Dolan,et al.  Applying Principles of Universal Design to Test Delivery: The Effect of Computer-Based Read-Aloud on Test Performance of High School Students with Learning Disabilities , 2005 .

[13]  David H. Rose,et al.  Universal Design for Learning: Associate Editor's Column , 2000 .

[14]  Thomas R. Kratochwill,et al.  Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Testing Accommodations on the Scores of Students with and without Disabilities , 2001 .

[15]  Molly Follette Story,et al.  The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Revised Edition. , 1998 .

[16]  James G. Shriner,et al.  Participation and Accommodation in State Assessment: The Role of Individualized Education Programs , 2003 .

[17]  Robert Helwig,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Accommodation Decisions on Large-Scale Mathematics Tests , 2003 .

[18]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  Universally Designed Assessments: Better Tests for Everyone! NCEO Policy Directions. , 2002 .

[19]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Using Objective Data Sources to Enhance Teacher Judgments about Test Accommodations , 2000 .

[20]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[21]  Peggy Coyne,et al.  Smart From the Start , 2001 .

[22]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Fair and Unfair Testing Accommodations. , 1999 .