When transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) modulates feature integration

How the brain integrates visual information across time into coherent percepts is an open question. Here, we presented two verniers with opposite offset directions one after the other. A vernier consists of two vertical bars that are horizontally offset. When the two verniers are separated by a blank screen (interstimulus interval, ISI), the two verniers are perceived either as two separate entities or as one vernier with the offset moving from one side to the other depending on the ISI. In both cases, their offsets can be reported independently. Transcranial magnet stimulation (TMS) over the occipital cortex does not interfere with the offset discrimination of either vernier. When a grating, instead of the ISI, is presented, the two verniers are not perceived separately anymore, but as ‘one’ vernier with ‘one’ fused vernier offset. TMS strongly modulates the percept of the fused vernier offset even though the spatio‐temporal position of the verniers is identical in the ISI and grating conditions. We suggest that the grating suppresses the termination signal of the first vernier and the onset signal of the second vernier. As a consequence, perception of the individual verniers is suppressed. Neural representations of the vernier and second vernier inhibit each other, which renders them vulnerable to TMS for at least 300 ms, even though stimulus presentation was only 100 ms. Our data suggest that stimulus features can be flexibly integrated in the occipital cortex, mediated by neural interactions with outlast stimulus presentations by far.

[1]  Tony Ro,et al.  Feedback Contributions to Visual Awareness in Human Occipital Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.

[2]  Rolf Nelson,et al.  When does grouping happen? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Christof Koch,et al.  Fusion of competing features is not serial , 2003, Vision Research.

[4]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Erratum and Note: PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 782–787 (1967)] , 1967 .

[5]  E W Yund,et al.  The micropattern effect and visible persistence , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Combining backward masking and transcranial magnetic stimulation in human observers , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  T Bachmann,et al.  Integration and Interruption in the Masking of Form by Form , 1976, Perception.

[11]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Bloch’s law and the dynamics of feature fusion , 2007, Vision Research.

[12]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[14]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Why the temporal order of events determines feature integration , 2005 .

[15]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[16]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  The effects of the global structure of the mask in visual backward masking , 2007, Vision Research.

[17]  A Reichenbach,et al.  The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  E Corthout,et al.  Timing of activity in early visual cortex as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[20]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  The role of visual pattern persistence in bistable stroboscopic motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Herzog,et al.  Pitting temporal against spatial integration in schizophrenic patients , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[23]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[24]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[25]  Frouke Hermens,et al.  Spatial grouping determines temporal integration. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[27]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long lasting effects of unmasking in a feature fusion paradigm , 2007, Psychological research.

[28]  Frouke Hermens,et al.  Visual backward masking: Modeling spatial and temporal aspects , 2007, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[29]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[30]  S L Macknik,et al.  The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The ‘when’ parietal pathway explored by lesion studies , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  E D Adrian,et al.  The action of light on the eye: Part I. The discharge of impulses in the optic nerve and its relation to the electric changes in the retina. , 2022, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Feature Fusion Reveals Slow and Fast Visual Memories , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Sensory and Association Cortex in Time Perception , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Francis,et al.  Combining simultaneous with temporal masking. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[39]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  The right parietal cortex and time perception: back to Critchley and the Zeitraffer phenomenon , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[40]  R. Efron THE DURATION OF THE PRESENT , 1967 .

[41]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[42]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Spatial processing and visual backward masking , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.