The influence of distributed collaboration in design processes: an analysis of design activity on information, problem, and solution

Design education and practices increasingly involve distributed collaboration. However, its effects on students’ design processes, and on the nature of collaboration instruction, remain unclear. The aim of this study was to extend the present understanding of distributed collaborative design by comparing the design activities regarding information–problem–solution (IPS) in two types of environment: distributed and co-located. We conducted a conceptual design experiment and analysed the different kinds of design activity by encoding the design process using an IPS coding approach. We also measured students’ subjective experiences of their design-related activities using a questionnaire. After examining the distribution, content, transition, and cluster of IPS activities, the comprehensive analysis results showed that the distributed collaborative environment produced negligible effects on the production and interaction of IPS design activities, but affected students’ exploration of design content of IPS activities. By contrast, the questionnaire results indicated that distributed collaboration prompted students to concentrate better, which positively impacted their experiences. This work offers useful insights into distributed collaboration in design education.

[1]  R. Sawyer,et al.  Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. , 2009, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.

[2]  Robert McCormick,et al.  Collaboration: The Challenge of ICT , 2004 .

[3]  Marta Royo González,et al.  Influence of the dominant thinking style in the degree of novelty of designs in virtual and traditional working environments , 2016 .

[4]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[5]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  A comparative analysis of multimodal communication during design sketching in co-located and distributed environments , 2014 .

[6]  Sotirios Paroutis,et al.  Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity , 2016 .

[8]  Y.-M. Deng,et al.  Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design , 2002, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Matt Marx,et al.  Managing Creativity in Small Worlds , 2006 .

[10]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[11]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  The effects of computing technology in creative design tasks: a case study of design collaboration , 2009, C&C '09.

[12]  John F. Dannenhoffer,et al.  Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams by Adapting Team Processes , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[13]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Design Problems and Design Paradoxes , 2006, Design Issues.

[14]  François Coldefy,et al.  DigiTable: an interactive multiuser table for collocated and remote collaboration enabling remote gesture visualization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  John C. Tang,et al.  VideoWhiteboard: video shadows to support remote collaboration , 1991, CHI.

[16]  Begoña Jorda-Albiñana,et al.  Online Collaborative Environments in the Creative Process of Product Development for Engineering Students , 2012 .

[17]  Ji Young Cho,et al.  Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio , 2014 .

[18]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design , 2013 .

[19]  Rodriguez-Donaire Silvia,et al.  The Influence of Online Communication and Web-Based Collaboration Environments on Group Collaboration and Performance , 2012 .

[20]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact , 1992, CHI.

[21]  Mao-Lin Chiu,et al.  An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration , 2002 .

[22]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Analysing participation in collaborative design environments , 2000 .

[23]  John S. Gero,et al.  Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function-behaviour-structure coding scheme , 2011 .

[24]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Let's search together, but not too close! An analysis of communication and performance in collaborative information seeking , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Andreas Larsson,et al.  Making sense of collaboration: the challenge of thinking together in global design teams , 2003, GROUP.

[26]  Jon-Chao Hong,et al.  Collaborative learning in technological project design , 2011 .

[27]  Kejun Zhang,et al.  Designers' perception during sketching: An examination of Creative Segment theory using eye movements , 2014 .

[28]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[29]  Neal Dreamson,et al.  Online Collaboration in Design Education: an Experiment in Real‐Time Manipulation of Prototypes and Communication , 2016 .

[30]  Lingyun Sun,et al.  The role of mental models in collaborative sketching , 2015 .

[31]  Ngoc Vo,et al.  The effect of subliminal suggestions on Sudden Moments of Inspiration (SMI) in the design process , 2013 .

[32]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design , 2009 .

[33]  E. Sopensky.  The Skill and Art of Collaboration. , 1994 .

[34]  Alexandre Pauchet,et al.  TableTops: Worthwhile Experiences of Collocated and Remote Collaboration , 2007, Tabletop.

[35]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[36]  E. Mulet,et al.  Analysis of students opinion about a creative design experience by means of virtual sincronous teams , 2013 .

[37]  Lingyun Sun,et al.  Creative Segment: A descriptive theory applied to computer-aided sketching , 2014 .

[38]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[39]  Ann Højbjerg Clarke,et al.  Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public–Private-Innovation partnerships , 2014 .