Scripting to enhance university students’ critical thinking in flipped learning: implications of the delayed effect on science reading literacy

ABSTRACT Premised on Web 2.0 technology, the current study investigated the effect of facilitating critical thinking using the Collaborative Questioning, Reading, Answering, and Checking (C-QRAC) collaboration script on university students’ science reading literacy in flipped learning conditions. Participants were 85 Taiwanese university students recruited from two introductory educational psychology courses. Groups were formed by affinity grouping and were randomly assigned to collaborative learning conditions with or without C-QRAC script support. Both groups received direct introduction to critical thinking and were given the assigned reading before class. Results of the study showed that direct instruction on critical thinking may have an immediate effect on science reading literacy for both groups. Moreover, the effect of the C-QRAC collaboration script was contingent upon time, gender moderation, and test formats. Students who followed the C-QRAC script performed better on the delayed advanced multiple-choice items than those in the control group. Further, the C-QRAC script helped eliminate the gender gap in immediate and delayed total MC. But in delayed basic MC, males demonstrated higher scores than females. Higher prior knowledge predicted better scores on delayed basic MC as well as immediate and delayed constructed-response items. The findings imply that providing structure for university students in the flipped collaborative science reading had a sustained effect on their learning such that they were more likely to think about the questions discussed with partners, to try to find the answers to the questions, to discuss findings in the reading content with friends, or to reread the shared online note or article. As a result, we suggest use of the C-QRAC collaboration script to facilitate students’ critical thinking and enhance their self-directed learning in flipped learning conditions.

[1]  Peter A. Facione,et al.  Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report) , 1990 .

[2]  A. King Structuring Peer Interaction to Promote High-Level Cognitive Processing , 2002 .

[3]  Mary Pat Wenderoth,et al.  Gender Gaps in Achievement and Participation in Multiple Introductory Biology Classrooms , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[4]  R. Vieira,et al.  Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education , 2016 .

[5]  Edward Palmer,et al.  Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[6]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[7]  D. Halpern Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[8]  Nancy A. Schiller,et al.  Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom , 2013 .

[9]  M. Wander,et al.  Science Literacy, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Literature: Guidelines for Evaluating Scientific Literature in the Classroom , 2012 .

[10]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts , 2009 .

[11]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[13]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[14]  Elizabeth J Marsh,et al.  Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[15]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  Kimberly D. Tanner,et al.  Structure Matters: Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[17]  L. Yore,et al.  Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research , 2003 .

[18]  Patrick Griffin,et al.  Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills , 2011 .

[19]  Sharon Bailin,et al.  Critical Thinking and Science Education , 2002 .

[20]  Vahideh Hassan-Zadeh,et al.  Supporting students in developing literacy in science , 2019 .

[21]  Harold W. Stevenson,et al.  Gender Differences in Interest and Knowledge Acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan , 2002 .

[22]  Yee Lee Shing,et al.  The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Memory: A Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective , 2013, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.

[23]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  An Overview of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Effects in Comprehension: The CI Perspective , 2005 .

[24]  M. Chiu,et al.  Hong Kong Student Achievement in OECD-PISA Study: Gender Differences in Science Content, Literacy Skills, and Test Item Formats , 2004 .

[25]  Catherine H. Crouch,et al.  Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom , 2006 .

[26]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[27]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Dynamic Grouping in Collaborative Learning Supported by Wireless Handhelds , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  J. Osborne,et al.  Bridging science education and science communication research , 2015 .

[29]  S. Slough,et al.  Building Prior Knowledge and Vocabulary in Science in the Intermediate Grades: Creating Hooks for Learning , 2010 .

[30]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Promoting critical, elaborative discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams , 2014 .

[31]  Yuan-Hsuan Lee,et al.  Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[32]  P. Facione Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. , 1990 .

[33]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  SEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption , 2007 .

[34]  A. King Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy , 1991 .

[35]  A. King Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures , 1989 .

[36]  Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation , 2012 .

[37]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[38]  F. Sun,et al.  Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  H. Biemans,et al.  Facilitation of computer-supported collaborative learning in mixed- versus same-culture dyads: Does a collaboration script help? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[40]  Sharon Bailin,et al.  Conceptualizing critical thinking , 1999 .

[41]  Sheri Berkeley,et al.  QRAC-the-Code , 2013, Journal of learning disabilities.