Evaluation of a SARS‐CoV‐2 antigen‐detecting rapid diagnostic test as a self‐test: Diagnostic performance and usability

To control the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) epidemics, it is necessary to have easy‐to‐use, reliable diagnostic tests available. The nasopharyngeal sampling method being often uncomfortable, nasal sampling could prove to be a viable alternative to the reference sampling method. We performed a multicentre, prospective validation study of the COVID‐VIRO® test, using a nasal swab sampling method, in a point‐of‐care setting. In addition, we performed a multicentre, prospective, and usability study to validate the use of the rapid antigen nasal diagnostic test by laypersons. In March 2021, 239 asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were included in the validation study. Compared with reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal samples, the sensitivity and specificity of the COVID‐VIRO® Antigen test combined with a nasal sampling method were evaluated as 96.88% and 100%, respectively. A total of 101 individuals were included in the usability study. Among these, 99% of the participants rated the instructions material as good, 98% of the subjects executed the test procedure well, and 98% of the participants were able to correctly interpret the test results. This study validates the relevance of COVID‐VIRO® as a diagnostic tool from nasal specimens as well as its usability in the general population. COVID‐VIRO® diagnostic performances and ease of use make it suitable for widespread utilization.

[1]  M. Hellwich,et al.  Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community , 2021, Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

[2]  G. Pialoux,et al.  High performance of a novel antigen detection test on nasopharyngeal specimens for diagnosing SARS‐CoV‐2 infection , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[3]  M. Álvarez-Sauco,et al.  Meningitis due to cerebrospinal fluid leak after nasal swab testing for COVID‐19 , 2021, European journal of neurology.

[4]  J. Rupp,et al.  Complications of nasal and pharyngeal swabs: a relevant challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic? , 2020, European Respiratory Journal.

[5]  C. Denkinger,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected anterior nasal swab versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  J. Greenlee,et al.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak After Nasal Swab Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019. , 2020, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[7]  Cho-Yi Chen,et al.  New COVID-19 saliva-based test: How good is it compared with the current nasopharyngeal or throat swab test? , 2020, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.

[8]  H. Rothan,et al.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Journal of Autoimmunity.

[9]  Christian Drosten,et al.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: The species and its viruses – a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group , 2020, bioRxiv.

[10]  T. Peto COVID-19: Rapid Antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow 1 assay: a national systematic evaluation for mass-testing , 2021 .