Amateur football game on artificial turf: players' perceptions.

The purpose of this study was to establish whether players' perceptions in football competitions played on artificial turf can be influenced by the pitch under examination, the kind of infill material used, the weather conditions and by player's role in the team. A multifactorial statistical analysis was made of the results obtained from over 1600 U.E.F.A. questionnaires completed by amateur footballers. Pitch and weather factors were demonstrated to be relevant to the aspects investigated. Conversely, the players' role and the infill material were significant for only a few aspects; for each variable, the analysis indicated the most favourable conditions. Overall, the analysis provided insight into amateur players' favourable feelings about artificial turf, compared with its natural alternative (actually made of earth, without grass in the case of amateur players).

[1]  William Kruskal,et al.  A Nonparametric test for the Several Sample Problem , 1952 .

[2]  W. Kruskal.  Historical Notes on the Wilcoxon Unpaired Two-Sample Test , 1957 .

[3]  J. Susan Milton,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences , 1990 .

[4]  B M Nigg,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of playing surfaces. , 1987, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  B M Nigg,et al.  Energy aspects for elastic and viscous shoe soles and playing surfaces. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[7]  J. Tukey.  Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. , 1949, Biometrics.

[8]  Eric A Nauman,et al.  Peak Torque and Rotational Stiffness Developed at the Shoe-Surface Interface , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  J S Torg,et al.  The Effect of Ambient Temperature on the Shoe-Surface interface Release Coefficient , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  M. Meyers,et al.  Incidence, Causes, and Severity of High School Football Injuries on FieldTurf versus Natural Grass , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  B M Nigg,et al.  Surface-Related Injuries in Soccer , 1989, Sports medicine.

[12]  B M Nigg,et al.  The validity and relevance of tests used for the assessment of sports surfaces. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[14]  M. Howard,et al.  Physiologic Axial Load, Frictional Resistance, and the Football Shoe—Surface Interface , 2003, Foot & ankle international.

[15]  B M Nigg,et al.  Biomechanics, Load Analysis and Sports Injuries in the Lower Extremities , 1985, Sports medicine.

[16]  P. Armitage,et al.  Statistical methods in medical research. , 1972 .

[17]  John Standeven,et al.  A comparison of artificial turf. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  John Standeven,et al.  Does the use of artificial turf contribute to head injuries? , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  M. Howard,et al.  Differences in Friction and Torsional Resistance in Athletic Shoe-Turf Surface Interfaces , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  B M Nigg,et al.  The Influence of Playing Surfaces on the Load on the Locomotor System and on Football and Tennis Injuries , 1988, Sports medicine.

[21]  John Orchard,et al.  Is There a Relationship Between Ground and Climatic Conditions and Injuries in Football? , 2002, Sports medicine.

[22]  S J Dixon,et al.  Artificial playing surfaces research: a review of medical, engineering and biomechanical aspects. , 1999, International journal of sports medicine.