The effects of robot assisted gait training on temporal-spatial characteristics of people with spinal cord injuries: A systematic review

Context: Robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) technology can be used as a rehabilitation tool or as an assistive device for spinal cord injured (SCI) individuals. Its impact on upright stepping characteristics of SCI individuals using treadmill or overground robotic exoskeleton systems has yet to be established. Objective: To systematically review the literature and identify if overground or treadmill based RAGT use in SCI individuals elicited differences in temporal-spatial characteristics and functional outcome measures. Methods: A systematic search of the literature investigating overground and treadmill RAGT in SCIs was undertaken excluding case-studies and case-series. Studies were included if the primary outcomes were temporal-spatial gait parameters. Study inclusion and methodological quality were assessed and determined independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using a validated scoring system for randomized and non-randomized trials. Results: Twelve studies met all inclusion criteria. Participant numbers ranged from 5-130 with injury levels from C2 to T12, American Spinal Injuries Association A-D. Three studies used overground RAGT systems and the remaining nine focused on treadmill based RAGT systems. Primary outcome measures were walking speed and walking distance. The use of treadmill or overground based RAGT did not result in an increase in walking speed beyond that of conventional gait training and no studies reviewed enabled a large enough improvement to facilitate community ambulation. Conclusion: The use of RAGT in SCI individuals has the potential to benefit upright locomotion of SCI individuals. Its use should not replace other therapies but be incorporated into a multi-modality rehabilitation approach.

[1]  Gong Chen,et al.  A review of lower extremity assistive robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy. , 2013, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[2]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  A Case‐Mix Classification System for Medical Rehabilitation , 1994, Medical care.

[3]  Dennis R. Louie,et al.  Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  J J Eng,et al.  A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[5]  Ana Esclarín-Ruz,et al.  A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[7]  Hee-Young Song.  Modeling social reintegration in persons with spinal cord injury , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  P. London.  Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[9]  V. Dietz,et al.  Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury. , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[10]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[11]  PL Dittuno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[12]  D. Edwards,et al.  Gait training in human spinal cord injury using electromechanical systems: effect of device type and patient characteristics. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Eric Kerckhofs,et al.  Robot-assisted walking with the Lokomat: the influence of different levels of guidance force on thorax and pelvis kinematics. , 2015, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Richard W. Bohannon.  Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[15]  J. Minkel.  Seating and mobility considerations for people with spinal cord injury. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[16]  M. Mirbagheri,et al.  Ankle voluntary movement enhancement following robotic-assisted locomotor training in spinal cord injury , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Physical therapy after spinal cord injury: A systematic review of treatments focused on participation , 2014, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[18]  S. Fritz,et al.  White paper: "walking speed: the sixth vital sign". , 2009, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[19]  Angela Boland,et al.  Doing a Systematic Review. A Student's Guide. Third Edition , 2023, Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.

[20]  E. Field-Fote,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Gait Quality Is Improved by Locomotor Training in Individuals with Sci Regardless of Training Approach , 2022 .

[21]  H. V. Hedel,et al.  Gait Speed in Relation to Categories of Functional Ambulation After Spinal Cord Injury , 2009 .

[22]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful , 2007, Stroke.

[23]  Xun Niu,et al.  Prediction of gait recovery in spinal cord injured individuals trained with robotic gait orthosis , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  Pierre Asselin,et al.  Vertical ground reaction force-based analysis of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with motor-complete paraplegia , 2013, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[26]  T. Schnitzer,et al.  The mechanical consequence of actual bone loss and simulated bone recovery in acute spinal cord injury. , 2014, Bone.

[27]  M. Popovic,et al.  Multidirectional quantification of trunk stiffness and damping during unloaded natural sitting. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  Pierre Asselin,et al.  Neuromechanical adaptations during a robotic powered exoskeleton assisted walking session , 2018, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[29]  K. Roach,et al.  Influence of a Locomotor Training Approach on Walking Speed and Distance in People With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[30]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[31]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[32]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Using Robot-Applied Resistance to Augment Body-Weight–Supported Treadmill Training in an Individual With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[33]  E. Field-Fote,et al.  Locomotor Training Approaches for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Report of Walking‐related Outcomes , 2005, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[34]  S. DeSanto-Madeya.  Adaptation to Spinal Cord Injury for Families Post-Injury , 2009, Nursing science quarterly.

[35]  J. J. Gil,et al.  Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges , 2011, J. Robotics.

[36]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[37]  W A Bauman,et al.  Coronary heart disease in individuals with spinal cord injury: assessment of risk factors , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[38]  N König,et al.  Is gait variability reliable? An assessment of spatio-temporal parameters of gait variability during continuous overground walking. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[39]  Bram Koopman,et al.  The effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: an explorative study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[40]  Andrea Furlan,et al.  Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group , 2003, Spine.

[41]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[42]  A. Spungen,et al.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry overestimates bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in persons with spinal cord injury , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[43]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[44]  R. Meeusen,et al.  Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[45]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[46]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Kinematic trajectories while walking within the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[47]  A. Geurts,et al.  Definition dependent properties of the cortical silent period in upper-extremity muscles, a methodological study , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[48]  Carey L. Holleran,et al.  Importance of Specificity, Amount, and Intensity of Locomotor Training to Improve Ambulatory Function in Patients Poststroke , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[49]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  Therapeutic interventions after spinal cord injury , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  A. Wernig,et al.  Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI , 2006, Neurology.

[51]  S. Hutchins,et al.  Comparison of gait between healthy participants and persons with spinal cord injury when using a powered gait orthosis-a pilot study , 2014, Spinal Cord.

[52]  Mónica Alcobendas-Maestro,et al.  Lokomat Robotic-Assisted Versus Overground Training Within 3 to 6 Months of Incomplete Spinal Cord Lesion , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[53]  Arvind Ramanujam,et al.  Training Response to Longitudinal Powered Exoskeleton Training for SCI , 2017 .

[54]  H. V. van Hedel,et al.  Gait speed in relation to categories of functional ambulation after spinal cord injury. , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[55]  T. Hornby,et al.  Clinical and Quantitative Evaluation of Robotic-Assisted Treadmill Walking to Retrain Ambulation After Spinal Cord Injury , 2005 .

[56]  Rob Labruyère,et al.  Strength training versus robot-assisted gait training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized pilot study in patients depending on walking assistance , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[57]  V. Dietz,et al.  The physiological basis of neurorehabilitation - locomotor training after spinal cord injury , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[58]  M. Sipski,et al.  Neurogenic bladder, neurogenic bowel, and sexual dysfunction in people with spinal cord injury. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[59]  R K Jones,et al.  The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[60]  Christopher Kirtley,et al.  Clinical Gait Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[61]  M Massucci,et al.  Walking with the Advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (ARGO) in thoracic paraplegic patients: energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory performance , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[62]  M. Levin,et al.  Emergence of Virtual Reality as a Tool for Upper Limb Rehabilitation: Incorporation of Motor Control and Motor Learning Principles , 2014, Physical Therapy.