Meta-Brokering requirements and research directions in state-of-the-art Grid Resource Management

Grid resource management is probably the research field mostly affected by user demands. Though well-designed, evaluated and widely used resource brokers, meta-schedulers have been developed, new capabilities are required, such as agreement and interoperability support. Existing solutions cannot cross the border of current middleware systems that are lacking the support of these requirements. In this paper we examine and compare different research directions followed by researchers in the field of Grid Resource Management regarding the level on top of brokering approaches. Our proposed meta-brokering approach means a higher level resource management by enabling communication among existing Grid Brokers and utilizing them. We state the requirements of this novel middleware service, and define a general meta-brokering architecture to be implemented as a Service Oriented Knowledge Utility (SOKU) in future generation grids.

[1]  Salvatore Orlando,et al.  Instrument Element: a new grid component that enables the control of remote instrumentation , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'06).

[2]  Ivan Rodero,et al.  Data Model for Describing Grid Resource Broker Capabilities , 2008 .

[3]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  A taxonomy and survey of grid resource management systems for distributed computing , 2002, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[4]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  Multi-Grid, Multi-User Workflows in the P-GRADE Grid Portal , 2005, Journal of Grid Computing.

[5]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  Meta-Broker for Future Generation Grids: A New Approach for a High-Level Interoperable Resource Management , 2008 .

[6]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  Multi-grid brokering with the P-GRADE portal , 2006 .

[7]  Eduardo Huedo,et al.  Evaluation of a Utility Computing Model Based on the Federation of Grid Infrastructures , 2007, Euro-Par.

[8]  Tamas Kiss,et al.  Towards a scientific workflow-oriented computational WorldWide Grid , 2007 .

[10]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  InterGrid: a case for internetworking islands of Grids , 2008, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[11]  Ramin Yahyapour,et al.  Using SLA for Resource Management and Scheduling-a Survey, TR-0096 , 2007 .

[12]  Péter Kacsuk,et al.  A Taxonomy of Grid Resource Brokers , 2007 .

[13]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  Inter-operating grids through delegated matchmaking , 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC '07).

[14]  Dan Tsafrir,et al.  A Short Survey of Commercial Cluster Batch Schedulers , 2005 .

[15]  Jesús Labarta,et al.  eNANOS: Coordinated Scheduling in Grid Environments , 2005, PARCO.

[16]  Yanbin Liu,et al.  Looking for an Evolution of Grid Scheduling: Meta-Brokering , 2008 .

[17]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  The Globus project: a status report , 1998, Proceedings Seventh Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW'98).