Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice

The growing interest in Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques and recognition of their importance in IS research suggests the need to compare and contrast different types of SEM techniques so that research designs can be selected appropriately. After assessing the extent to which these techniques are currently being used in IS research, the article presents a running example which analyzes the same dataset via three very different statistical techniques. It then compares two classes of SEM: covariance-based SEM and partial-least-squaresbased SEM. Finally, the article discusses linear regression models and offers guidelines as to when SEM techniques and when regression techniques should be used. The article concludes with heuristics and rule of thumb thresholds to guide practice, and a discussion of the extent to which practice is in accord with these guidelines.

[1]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[2]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[3]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[4]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[6]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[7]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use , 2022 .

[10]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[11]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 1994, ICIS.

[12]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Problems in the Measurement of Latent Variables in Structural Equations Causal Models , 1990 .

[13]  KeilMark,et al.  The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use , 1998 .

[14]  G. Rose,et al.  PREDICTING GENERAL IT USE : APPLYING TAM TO THE ARABIC WORLD , 1998 .

[15]  Catherine M. Ridings,et al.  Applying TAM to a Paralell Systems Conversion Strategy , 2000 .

[16]  D. Campbell Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. , 1960 .

[17]  Lillian Cohen,et al.  Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. , 1954 .

[18]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[19]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[22]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[23]  Michael Potter,et al.  Adoption of computer aided software engineering (CASE) technology: an innovation adoption perspective , 1995, DATB.

[24]  L. Harlow,et al.  Causation issues in structural equation modeling research , 1994 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  What Do Intention Scales Measure , 1992 .

[28]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[29]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[31]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[32]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution , 1995 .

[33]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition , 1987 .

[34]  D. Gefen,et al.  Lessons Learnt from the Successful Adoption of an ERP: The Central Role of Trust , 2000 .

[35]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Effective IS Security: An Empirical Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[37]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[38]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 1998, DATB.

[39]  R. F.,et al.  Mathematical Statistics , 1944, Nature.

[40]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis , 1998 .

[43]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[44]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[45]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[46]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .

[47]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[48]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[49]  A. Shapiro,et al.  On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statistics , 1985 .

[50]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales , 1993 .

[51]  Tino Fenech,et al.  Using Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness to Predict Acceptance of the World Wide Web , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[52]  J. Hunter,et al.  On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria , 1987 .

[53]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[55]  I. Stelzl Changing a Causal Hypothesis without Changing the Fit: some Rules for Generating Equivalent Path Models. , 1986, Multivariate behavioral research.

[56]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[57]  Kalyan Moy Gupta,et al.  An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Software Package Selection , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[59]  Yael Edan,et al.  An Individual Feed Allocation Decision Support System for the Dairy Farm , 2001 .

[60]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[61]  David Gefen,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000 .

[62]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  David Gefen,et al.  Building users' trust in freeware providers and the effects of this trust on users' perceptions of usefulness, ease of use and intended use of freeware , 1997 .

[64]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  H. Blalock,et al.  Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations. , 1970 .

[66]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[68]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[69]  J. P. Peter Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices , 1979 .