Short-rotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in Flanders (Belgium) II. Energy production and CO2 emission reduction potential

Abstract Belgium, being an EU country, has committed itself to a 7.5% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions during the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Within this framework, the Flemish government aims at reaching a share of 6% of renewable electricity in the total electricity production by 2010. In this work, the biomass production of birch, maple, poplar and willow in a short-rotation forestry (SRF) plantation after a 4-year growth period served as the base to calculate the amount of (electrical) energy that could be produced by this type of bioenergy crop in Flanders. The maximum amount of electricity that could be provided by SRF biomass was estimated at 72.9 GWh e  year −1 , which only accounts for 0.16% of the total electricity production in this region. Although the energy output was rather low, the bioenergy production process under consideration appeared to be more energy efficient than energy production processes based on fossil fuels. The high efficiency of birch compared to the other species was mainly due to the high calorific value of the birch wood. The maximum CO 2 emission reduction potential of SRF plantations in Flanders was estimated at only 0.09% of the total annual CO 2 emission. The most interesting application of SRF in Flanders seemed to be the establishment of small-scale plantations, linked to a local combined heat and power plant. These plantations could be established on marginal arable soils or on polluted sites, and they could be of importance in the densely populated area of Flanders because of other environmental benefits, among which their function as (temporary) habitat for many species.

[1]  M. Acaroğlu,et al.  The cultivation and energy balance of Miscanthus×giganteus production in Turkey , 2005 .

[2]  J. Porter,et al.  A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming , 2001 .

[3]  Reinhard F. Hüttl,et al.  Production of biomass for energy in post-mining landscapes and nutrient dynamics , 2001 .

[4]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Energy budget and greenhouse gas balance evaluation of sustainable coppice systems for electricity production , 2003 .

[5]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of the land potential for the production of biomass for energy in the Netherlands. , 1998 .

[6]  R Venendaal,et al.  European energy crops: a synthesis , 1997 .

[7]  S. Orlović,et al.  Wood and bark of some poplar and willow clones as fuelwood , 2002 .

[8]  Stig Ledin,et al.  Willow wood properties, production and economy , 1996 .

[9]  Pedro Linares,et al.  Assessment of the externalities of biomass energy, and a comparison of its full costs with coal , 1998 .

[10]  Riccardo Valentini,et al.  The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: Implications of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology , 2002 .

[11]  J. Azevedo,et al.  Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data , 2005 .

[12]  M. Proe,et al.  Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry , 2002 .

[13]  M. Londo,et al.  Willow short-rotation coppice for energy and breeding birds: an exploration of potentials in relation to management , 2005 .

[14]  B. Schlamadinger,et al.  The potential of fuelwood to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Europe , 1998 .

[15]  Dirk Reheul,et al.  Energiegewassen in de vlaamse landbouwsector , 2003 .

[16]  Xavier Dubuisson,et al.  Energy and CO2 balances in different power generation routes using wood fuel from short rotation coppice , 1998 .

[17]  R. Matthews,et al.  Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems , 2001 .

[18]  Kurth Perttu,et al.  Environmental justification for short-rotation forestry in Sweden , 1998 .

[19]  P. Faúndez,et al.  Potential costs of four short-rotation silvicultural regimes used for the production of energy , 2003 .

[20]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. III. Second rotation results , 2005 .

[21]  V. Goel,et al.  Fuelwood quality of promising tree species for alkaline soil sites in relation to tree age , 1996 .

[22]  K. Richards,et al.  Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects , 2005 .

[23]  M. Labrecque,et al.  Biomass productivity and wood energy of Salix species after 2 years growth in SRIC fertilized with wastewater sludge. , 1997 .

[24]  M. Nellist.  Storage and drying of arable coppice , 1997 .

[25]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Fuel characteristics of short rotation forest biomass , 1999 .

[26]  K. Hülsbergen,et al.  A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial , 2001 .

[27]  Raoul Lemeur,et al.  Short-rotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in Flanders (Belgium) I—Biomass production after 4 years of tree growth , 2007 .

[28]  P. Trinkaus.  Short-rotation forestry: discussion of 10 Austrian principles from the viewpoint of preservation of environment and nature , 1998 .

[29]  R. Sage,et al.  Short rotation coppice for energy: towards ecological guidelines , 1998 .

[30]  R. Kataki,et al.  Fuelwood characteristics of indigenous tree species of north-east India. , 2002 .

[31]  W. M. Dawson,et al.  The performance of polyclonal stands in short rotation coppice willow for energy production , 1995 .

[32]  Martin Weih,et al.  Limitations and improvement of the potential utilisation of woody biomass for energy derived from short rotation woody crops in Sweden and Germany. , 2005 .