A reactive transport model for mercury fate in soil—application to different anthropogenic pollution sources

Soil systems are a common receptor of anthropogenic mercury (Hg) contamination. Soils play an important role in the containment or dispersion of pollution to surface water, groundwater or the atmosphere. A one-dimensional model for simulating Hg fate and transport for variably saturated and transient flow conditions is presented. The model is developed using the HP1 code, which couples HYDRUS-1D for the water flow and solute transport to PHREEQC for geochemical reactions. The main processes included are Hg aqueous speciation and complexation, sorption to soil organic matter, dissolution of cinnabar and liquid Hg, and Hg reduction and volatilization. Processes such as atmospheric wet and dry deposition, vegetation litter fall and uptake are neglected because they are less relevant in the case of high Hg concentrations resulting from anthropogenic activities. A test case is presented, assuming a hypothetical sandy soil profile and a simulation time frame of 50 years of daily atmospheric inputs. Mercury fate and transport are simulated for three different sources of Hg (cinnabar, residual liquid mercury or aqueous mercuric chloride), as well as for combinations of these sources. Results are presented and discussed with focus on Hg volatilization to the atmosphere, Hg leaching at the bottom of the soil profile and the remaining Hg in or below the initially contaminated soil layer. In the test case, Hg volatilization was negligible because the reduction of Hg2+ to Hg0 was inhibited by the low concentration of dissolved Hg. Hg leaching was mainly caused by complexation of Hg2+ with thiol groups of dissolved organic matter, because in the geochemical model used, this reaction only had a higher equilibrium constant than the sorption reactions. Immobilization of Hg in the initially polluted horizon was enhanced by Hg2+ sorption onto humic and fulvic acids (which are more abundant than thiols). Potential benefits of the model for risk management and remediation of contaminated sites are discussed.

[1]  B. Bessinger,et al.  The Hydrothermal Chemistry of Gold, Arsenic, Antimony, Mercury and Silver , 2003 .

[2]  Anthony Carpi,et al.  Application of a teflon™ dynamic flux chamber for quantifying soil mercury flux: Tests and results over background soil , 1998 .

[3]  T. Schmid,et al.  Spatial variation of biological and pedological properties in an area affected by a metallurgical mercury plant: Almadenejos (Spain) , 2011 .

[4]  J. Katon,et al.  Selective extractions to assess the biogeochemically relevant fractionation of inorganic mercury in sediments and soils , 2003 .

[5]  M. Dudas,et al.  Transformations of elemental mercury to inorganic and organic forms in mercury and hydrocarbon co-contaminated soils. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[6]  A. Buerkert,et al.  Vertical distribution of heavy metals in wastewater-irrigated vegetable garden soils of three West African cities , 2011, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[7]  T. Al,et al.  Mercury mobility in unsaturated gold mine tailings, Murray Brook mine, New Brunswick, Canada , 2006 .

[8]  M. Scholtz,et al.  Modelling of mercury emissions from background soils. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  B. Bessinger,et al.  Treatment of mercury‐contaminated soils with activated carbon: A laboratory, field, and modeling study , 2010 .

[10]  Liping Pang,et al.  Colloid‐Facilitated Solute Transport in Variably Saturated Porous Media: Numerical Model and Experimental Verification , 2006 .

[11]  Diederik Jacques,et al.  Modeling Coupled Hydrologic and Chemical Processes: Long‐Term Uranium Transport following Phosphorus Fertilization , 2008 .

[12]  E. Schulze,et al.  Controls on fluxes and export of dissolved organic carbon in grasslands with contrasting soil types , 2008 .

[13]  G. Brown,et al.  Speciation of mercury and mode of transport from placer gold mine tailings. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  David W. Blowes,et al.  Multicomponent reactive transport modeling in variably saturated porous media using a generalized formulation for kinetically controlled reactions , 2002 .

[15]  K. Schlüter,et al.  Review: evaporation of mercury from soils. An integration and synthesis of current knowledge , 2000 .

[16]  V. A. Medvedev,et al.  CODATA key values for thermodynamics , 1989 .

[17]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[18]  M. Gosar,et al.  Mercury in European agricultural and grazing land soils , 2013 .

[19]  B. Bessinger,et al.  Reactive Transport Modeling of Subaqueous Sediment Caps and Implications for the Long-Term Fate of Arsenic, Mercury, and Methylmercury , 2012, Aquatic Geochemistry.

[20]  Ruiping Li,et al.  Vertical Distribution and Mobility of Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils along Jishui River Affected by Mining in Jiangxi Province, China , 2014 .

[21]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Simplified contaminant source depletion models as analogs of multiphase simulators. , 2008, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[22]  M. Ravichandran,et al.  Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter--a review. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[23]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  Mercury as a Global Pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Yongguang Yin,et al.  Advances in Speciation Analysis of Mercury in the Environment , 2011 .

[25]  H. Biester,et al.  Mercury speciation analyses in HgCl(2)-contaminated soils and groundwater--implications for risk assessment and remediation strategies. , 2008, Water research.

[26]  Scott R. Charlton,et al.  PHAST Version 2?A Program for Simulating Groundwater Flow, Solute Transport, and Multicomponent Geochemical Reactions , 2014 .

[27]  L. Charlet,et al.  Atmospheric mercury incorporation in soils of an area impacted by a chlor-alkali plant (Grenoble, France): contribution of canopy uptake. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  R. Striegl,et al.  Transport of elemental mercury in the unsaturated zone from a waste disposal site in an arid region , 2008 .

[29]  Tushar Kanti Sen,et al.  Review on subsurface colloids and colloid-associated contaminant transport in saturated porous media. , 2006, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[30]  M. Gosar,et al.  Mercury speciation in tailings of the Idrija mercury mine , 1999 .

[31]  D. L. Parkhurst,et al.  User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations , 1999 .

[32]  K. Johannesson,et al.  Geochemical cycling of mercury in a deep, confined aquifer: Insights from biogeochemical reactive transport modeling , 2013 .

[33]  K. Xia,et al.  Distribution of mercury, methyl mercury and organic sulphur species in soil, soil solution and stream of a boreal forest catchment , 2003 .

[34]  G. Aromí,et al.  Synthesis of 3d metallic single-molecule magnets , 2006 .

[35]  Derek G Williamson,et al.  Principal Biogeochemical Factors Affecting the Speciation And Transport of Mercury through the terrestrial environment , 2004, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[36]  I. Ilyin,et al.  Long-term mercury dynamics in UK soils. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[37]  M. Horvat,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envres , 2022 .

[38]  Yong Cai,et al.  Environmental chemistry and toxicology of mercury , 2012 .

[39]  X. Font,et al.  Modelling of modern mercury vapor transport in an ancient hydrothermal system: environmental and geochemical implications , 2000 .

[40]  J. Andrews.  Mercury Speciation in the Environment Using X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy , 2006 .

[41]  U. Skyllberg.  Mercury Biogeochemistry in Soils and Sediments , 2010 .

[42]  L. Hylander,et al.  500 years of mercury production: global annual inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  B. Gworek,et al.  Mercury mobility and bioavailability in soil from contaminated area , 2008 .

[44]  J. Quirk,et al.  Permeability of porous solids , 1961 .

[45]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Mass-removal and mass-flux-reduction behavior for idealized source zones with hydraulically poorly-accessible immiscible liquid. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[46]  H. Biester,et al.  Binding and mobility of mercury in soils contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[47]  S. Q. Que Hee,et al.  The Environmental Geochemistry and Bioaccessibility of Mercury in Soils and Sediments: A Review , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  G. Eichholz,et al.  Migration of elemental mercury through soil from simulated burial sites , 1988 .

[49]  C. Steefel,et al.  Reactive transport modeling: An essential tool and a new research approach for the Earth sciences , 2005 .

[50]  J. Rinklebe,et al.  Dynamics of mercury fluxes and their controlling factors in large Hg-polluted floodplain areas. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[51]  U. Skyllberg,et al.  Chemical Speciation of Mercury in Soil and Sediment , 2011 .

[52]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Groundwater contaminant flux reduction resulting from nonaqueous phase liquid mass reduction , 2005 .

[53]  U. Skyllberg,et al.  Competition among thiols and inorganic sulfides and polysulfides for Hg and MeHg in wetland soils and sediments under suboxic conditions: Illumination of controversies and implications for MeHg net production , 2008 .

[54]  C. Baes,et al.  The hydrolysis of cations , 1986 .

[55]  G. Aiken,et al.  Dissolution of cinnabar (HgS) in the presence of natural organic matter , 2005 .

[56]  D Mallants,et al.  Operator-splitting errors in coupled reactive transport codes for transient variably saturated flow and contaminant transport in layered soil profiles. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[57]  E. Schuster,et al.  The behavior of mercury in the soil with special emphasis on complexation and adsorption processes - A review of the literature , 1991 .

[58]  C.A.J. Appelo,et al.  User's guide to PHREEQC - a computer program for speciation,batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inversegeochemical calculations. , 1999 .

[59]  M. Valiente,et al.  Determination of mercury in polluted soils surrounding a chlor-alkali plant: Direct speciation by X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques and preliminary geochemical characterisation of the area , 2006 .

[60]  M. Gil-Díaz,et al.  Mercury uptake by Silene vulgaris grown on contaminated spiked soils. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[61]  B. Tansel,et al.  Mercury Uptake and Translocation in Impatiens walleriana Plants Grown in the Contaminated Soil from Oak Ridge , 2010, International journal of phytoremediation.

[62]  P G Whitehead,et al.  Using the INCA-Hg model of mercury cycling to simulate total and methyl mercury concentrations in forest streams and catchments. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[63]  D. A. Barry,et al.  Three-dimensional model for multi-component reactive transport with variable density groundwater flow , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[64]  T. Moore,et al.  Adsorption of dissolved organic carbon to mineral soils: A comparison of four isotherm approaches , 2008 .

[65]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[66]  D. A. Barry,et al.  MODFLOW/MT3DMS‐Based Reactive Multicomponent Transport Modeling , 2003, Ground water.

[67]  R. Terzano,et al.  Mercury speciation in the colloidal fraction of a soil polluted by a chlor-alkali plant: a case study in the South of Italy. , 2010, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[68]  Diederik Jacques,et al.  Modelling coupled water flow, solute transport and geochemical reactions affecting heavy metal migration in a podzol soil , 2008 .

[69]  S. A. Abdrashitova,et al.  Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation , 2001 .

[70]  W. Massman.  Molecular diffusivities of Hg vapor in air, O2 and N2 near STP and the kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of air near STP , 1999 .

[71]  R. Byrne,et al.  Chemical speciation of environmentally significant heavy metals with inorganic ligands part 1: The Hg2+- Cl-, OH-, CO32-, so42-, and PO 43- aqueous systems , 2004 .

[72]  B. Gu,et al.  Transport and interactions of kaolinite and mercury in saturated sand media. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[73]  M. Barnett,et al.  Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils. Part 1: simulation of gaseous mercury emissions from soils using a two-resistance exchange interface model , 2002 .

[74]  D. A. Barry,et al.  Implementation of variably saturated flow into PHREEQC for the simulation of biogeochemical reactions in the vadose zone , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[75]  Nicolas Jacquemet,et al.  Thermoddem: A geochemical database focused on low temperature water/rock interactions and waste materials , 2012 .