Kinetic models of opinion formation in the presence of personal conviction.

We consider a nonlinear kinetic equation of Boltzmann type, which takes into account the influence of conviction during the formation of opinion in a system of agents, which interact through the binary exchanges, introduced by Toscani [G. Toscani, Commun. Math. Sci. 4, 481 (2006)]. The original exchange mechanism, which is based on the human tendency to compromise and change of opinion through self-thinking, is here modified in the parameters of the compromise and diffusion terms, which now are assumed to depend on the personal degree of conviction. The numerical simulations show that the presence of conviction has the potential to break symmetry, and to produce clusters of opinions. The model is partially inspired by the recent work [L. Pareschi and G. Toscani, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130396 (2014)], in which the role of knowledge in the formation of wealth distribution has been investigated.

[1]  Frédéric Abergel,et al.  Econophysics and data-driven modelling of market dynamics , 2015 .

[2]  Francesco Salvarani,et al.  The quasi-invariant limit for a kinetic model of sociological collective behavior , 2009 .

[3]  S. Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. mean‐behaviour description of a strike , 1982, 2211.07041.

[4]  Dla Polski,et al.  EURO , 2004 .

[5]  Marcello Delitala,et al.  On a discrete generalized kinetic approach for modelling persuader's influence in opinion formation processes , 2008, Math. Comput. Model..

[6]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distribution , 2000, cond-mat/0004256.

[7]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences , 2010 .

[8]  E. Ben-Naim.  Opinion dynamics: Rise and fall of political parties , 2004, cond-mat/0411427.

[9]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Reviews , 2014 .

[10]  Nuno Crokidakis,et al.  Role of noise and agents’ convictions on opinion spreading in a three-state voter-like model , 2013, 1306.4025.

[11]  S. Galam.  Heterogeneous beliefs, segregation, and extremism in the making of public opinions. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[13]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[14]  B. M. Fulk.  MATH , 1992 .

[15]  Parongama Sen.  Phase transitions in a two-parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  On a Kinetic Model for a Simple Market Economy , 2004, math/0412429.

[17]  Sébastien Motsch,et al.  Heterophilious Dynamics Enhances Consensus , 2013, SIAM Rev..

[18]  Francesco Salvarani,et al.  Conciliatory and contradictory dynamics in opinion formation , 2012 .

[19]  Anirban Chakraborti,et al.  Opinion formation in kinetic exchange models: spontaneous symmetry-breaking transition. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Francesco Salvarani,et al.  A KINETIC APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF OPINION FORMATION , 2009 .

[21]  Giuseppe Toscani,et al.  A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation , 2009 .

[22]  G. Toscani,et al.  Kinetic models of opinion formation , 2006 .

[23]  André C. R. Martins,et al.  The building up of individual inflexibility in opinion dynamics , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Soumyajyoti Biswas,et al.  On mean field solutions of kinetic exchange opinion models , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  L Pareschi,et al.  Wealth distribution and collective knowledge: a Boltzmann approach , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[26]  Celia Anteneodo,et al.  Role of conviction in non-equilibrium models of opinion formation , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences , 2000 .

[28]  S. Galam,et al.  Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups , 1991 .

[29]  P. Markowich,et al.  Boltzmann and Fokker–Planck equations modelling opinion formation in the presence of strong leaders , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  S. Galam,et al.  The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics , 2007, physics/0703021.

[31]  E. Ben-Naim,et al.  Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes , 2002, cond-mat/0212313.

[32]  S. Galam.  Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.

[33]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  From Individual Choice to Group Decision Making , 2000 .

[34]  S. Redner,et al.  Unity and discord in opinion dynamics , 2003 .