Electrical stimulation of reward sites in the ventral tegmental area increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens of the rat

In vivo microdialysis with HPLC-ED was used to measure dopamine (DA), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the nucleus accumbens of the rat, prior, during, and after 15-min periods of electrical brain stimulation at sites in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) that supported intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). In the first experiment, both ICSS and yoked stimulation of the VTA evoked significant increases in extracellular concentrations of DA, its metabolites, and 5-HIAA. Comparable results from ICSS and yoked groups were interpreted as evidence that the rewarding properties of VTA stimulation were a causal factor in the elevated DA transmission in the nucleus accumbens, rather than intense operant behavior. Further evidence for this hypothesis came from a second set of data in which changes in extracellular DA levels during the measurement of rate/intensity functions for ICSS were positively correlated. 5-HIAA concentrations also increased during ICSS but these changes were not correlated with either ICSS rate or current intensity, suggesting that changes in serotonin metabolism were unlikely to subserve brain stimulation reward in the VTA. These results add to the growing body of evidence linking changes in extracellular DA in the mesolimbic DA system with both brain stimulation reward and the conditioned and unconditioned rewarding effects of biologically relevant stimuli.

[1]  Norio Ozaki,et al.  increased dopamine and serotonin metabolism in rat nucleus accumbens produced by intracranial self-stimulation of medial forebrain bundle as measured by in vivo microdialysis , 1989, Brain Research.

[2]  A. Ettenberg,et al.  Haloperidol blocks the conditioned place preferences induced by rewarding brain stimulation. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  U. Ungerstedt,et al.  In vivo measurement of extracellular dopamine and DOPAC in rat striatum after various dopamine-releasing drugs; implications for the origin of extracellular DOPAC. , 1988, European journal of pharmacology.

[4]  S. Steiner,et al.  Escape from Self-Produced Rates of Brain Stimulation , 1969, Science.

[5]  A. Phillips,et al.  Sexual behavior increases dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of male rats: comparison with novelty and locomotion. , 1992 .

[6]  G. Arbuthnott,et al.  Amphetamine‐Induced Dopamine Release in the Rat Striatum: An In Vivo Microdialysis Study , 1988, Journal of neurochemistry.

[7]  Z. Merali,et al.  Re-evaluation of the role of dopamine in intracranial self-stimulation using in vivo microdialysis , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  R. M. Stutz,et al.  Subject control as a determinant of the reinforcing properties of intracranial stimulation , 1984, Physiology & Behavior.

[9]  A. Phillips,et al.  Sexual behavior increases c-fos expression in the forebrain of the male rat , 1991, Brain Research.

[10]  T. Crow,et al.  Catecholamine-containing neurones and electrical self-stimulation: 2. A theoretical interpretation and some psychiatric implications , 1973, Psychological Medicine.

[11]  B. Westerink,et al.  Scope and limitations of in vivo brain dialysis: a comparison of its application to various neurotransmitter systems. , 1987, Life sciences.

[12]  C. Blaha,et al.  Application of in vivo electrochemistry to the measurement of changes in dopamine release during intracranial self-stimulation , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  M. Herkenham,et al.  Mismatches between neurotransmitter and receptor localizations in brain: observations and implications , 1987, Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Phillips,et al.  Increased in vivo tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rat telencephalon produced by self-stimulation of the ventral tegmental area , 1987, Brain Research.

[15]  H. Benveniste,et al.  Microdialysis—Theory and application , 1990, Progress in Neurobiology.

[16]  N. Ozaki,et al.  The effect of uptake inhibition on dopamine release from the nucleus accumbens of rats during self- or forced stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: A microdialysis study , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Forebrain origins and terminations of the medial forebrain bundle metabolically activated by rewarding stimulation or by reward-blocking doses of pimozide , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Blaha,et al.  Neurochemical correlates of brain-stimulation reward measured by ex vivo and in vivo analyses , 1989, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  A. Phillips,et al.  The role of dopamine in intracranial self-stimulation of the ventral tegmental area , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[21]  P. Milner,et al.  Response involvement in brain stimulation reward , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[22]  K. P. Faircloth The importance of subject control in reinforcing brain stimulation , 1974 .

[23]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  From motivation to action: Functional interface between the limbic system and the motor system , 1980, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat , 1990, Brain Research.

[25]  N. Ozaki,et al.  Differential effect of self-stimulation on dopamine release and metabolism in the rat medial frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum studied by in vivo microdialysis , 1992, Brain Research.

[26]  A. Phillips,et al.  Self‐Stimulation of the Ventral Tegmental Area Enhances Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens: A Microdialysis Study a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.