Reporting to the police in western nations: A theoretical analysis of the effects of social context

One of the most consistent findings in empirical studies using victimization data is that the decision to report victimization to the police is determined in large part by the seriousness of the crime. The police will be notified more often of crimes that involve more serious injury or greater monetary loss. These findings, however, may be due to the fact that most studies on reporting have been conducted using victimization surveys that devote a great deal of attention to the crime event and victim characteristics and much less to the social context of that event. As a result, influences on reporting operating at the neighborhood, jurisdiction, or nation level have been neglected. The aim of this paper is to bring social context into the discourse on reporting to the police by presenting a much more inclusive model of crime reporting. In addition, the influence of four aspects of macro-level social context on reporting are tested—the perceived competence of the police, institutionalization of insurance business, norm of conformity, and level of individualism—by merging incident-level data from the International Crime Victims Survey (ICVS) for 16 Western industrialized countries with nation-level data from various sources. Hierarchical logistic modeling is used to analyze the nested data. The perceived competence of the police has a positive effect on whether property crimes are reported.

[1]  Mikael Søndergaard,et al.  Research Note: Hofstede's Consequences: A Study of Reviews, Citations and Replications , 1994 .

[2]  J. D. Orcutt,et al.  SEX-ROLE ATTITUDE CHANGE AND REPORTING OF RAPE VICTIMIZATION, 1973–1985 , 1988 .

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[4]  M. Conaway,et al.  A longitudinal analysis of factors associated with reporting violent crimes to the police , 1994 .

[5]  H. Triandis.  Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. , 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[6]  P. Mayhew,et al.  Criminal Victimisation in Seventeen Industrialised Countries. Key findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey , 2000 .

[7]  Carol B. Kalish,et al.  Crimes and victims : a report on the Dayton-San Jose pilot survey of victimization , 1974 .

[8]  L. Persson.  Hidden criminality : theoretical and methodological problems, empirical results , 1980 .

[9]  James A. Geschwender,et al.  The Roots of Urban Discontent: Public Policy, Municipal Institutions, and the Ghetto. , 1974 .

[10]  M. Greenberg,et al.  After the Crime:: Victim Decision Making , 1992 .

[11]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A Study of the Behavior of Law , 1979 .

[12]  H. Resnick,et al.  Factors related to the reporting of childhood rape. , 1999, Child abuse & neglect.

[13]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Coping With Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Reactions , 1981 .

[14]  J. Lynch,et al.  Self-Report Surveys as Measures of Crime and Criminal Victimization , 2000 .

[15]  James Garofalo,et al.  School-related victimizations among adolescents: An analysis of National Crime Survey (NCS) narratives , 1987 .

[16]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  CITIZEN REPORTING OF CRIME Some National Panel Data , 1976 .

[17]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  THE VICTIM‐OFFENDER RELATIONSHIP AND CALLING THE POLICE IN ASSAULTS* , 1999 .

[18]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[19]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .

[20]  Nathan W. Pino,et al.  Gender Differences in Rape Reporting , 1999 .

[21]  Richard R. Bennett,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON CRIME REPORTING IN A DEVELOPING NATION , 1994 .

[22]  E. Baumer.  NEIGHBORHOOD DISADVANTAGE AND POLICE NOTIFICATION BY VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE , 2002 .

[23]  R. Ruback,et al.  Normative Advice to Campus Crime Victims: Effects of Gender, Age, and Alcohol , 1999, Violence and Victims.

[24]  Ross Macmillan,et al.  The effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women , 1995 .

[25]  Are America's Schools Safe? Students Speak Out: 1999 School Crime Supplement. Statistical Analysis Report. , 2002 .

[26]  Peter V. Miller,et al.  Matching Survey Responses to Official Records: An Exploration of Validity in Victimization Reporting , 1985 .

[27]  W. Rohe,et al.  Safe and secure neighborhoods : physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods , 1982 .

[28]  Jan Pieter van Oudenhoven,et al.  Do organizations reflect national cultures? A 10-nation study , 2001 .

[29]  David A. Klinger,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN CALLS‐FOR‐SERVICE AS AN INDICATOR OF CRIME* , 1997 .

[30]  Gideon Fishman,et al.  PATTERNS OF VICTIMISATION AND NOTIFICATION , 1979 .

[31]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  OF CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION , 1981 .

[32]  Barbara Perry,et al.  Criminal victimization in the industrialized world , 1994 .

[33]  James P. Lynch,et al.  Routine activity and victimization at work , 1987 .

[34]  Simon I. Singer,et al.  The fear of reprisal and the failure of victims to report a personal crime , 1988 .

[35]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[36]  Wojciech Nasierowski,et al.  Culture Dimensions of Polish Managers: Hofstede's Indices , 1998 .

[37]  R. Bachman,et al.  Police Involvement in Domestic Violence: The Interactive Effects of Victim Injury, Offender’s History of Violence, and Race , 1995, Violence and Victims.

[38]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[39]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[40]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Reporting Crimes to the Police: The Status of World Research , 1984 .

[41]  R. Bachman,et al.  Predicting the Reporting of Rape Victimizations , 1993 .

[42]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  REASONS FOR REPORTING AND NOT REPORTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TO THE POLICE , 2002 .

[43]  J. Lynch,et al.  Offense seriousness scaling: An alternative to scenario methods , 1993 .

[44]  R. Ruback.  Comment on Bachman (1993) , 1993 .

[45]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[46]  Richard Sparks,et al.  Surveying victims: A study of the measurement of criminal victimization, perceptions of crime, and attitudes to criminal justice , 1979 .

[47]  E. F. Avakame,et al.  “Did you call the police? What did they do?” An empirical assessment of black's theory of mobilization of law , 1999 .

[48]  Patrick A. Langan,et al.  Job activities and personal crime victimization: Implications for theory☆ , 1987 .

[49]  Elijah Anderson.  Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City , 1999 .

[50]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  Validation of a Measure of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Against an Objective Behavioral Criterion , 1994 .

[51]  Mike Maguire,et al.  Recent Book: Burglary in a Dwelling — The Offence, the Offender and the Victim , 1983 .

[52]  Ralph B. Taylor.  Breaking Away from Broken Windows: Baltimore Neighborhoods and the Nationwide Fight Against Crime, Grime, Fear, and Decline , 2000 .

[53]  Raymond H. C. Teske,et al.  Reporting of crime to the police in the Federal Republic of Germany: A comparison of the old and the new lands , 1999 .

[54]  T. Gladwin.  Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1981 .

[55]  Donald Black,et al.  The behavior of law , 1976 .