Evoked haptic sensations in the hand via non-invasive proximal nerve stimulation

OBJECTIVE Haptic perception of a prosthetic limb or hand is a crucial, but often unmet, need which impacts the utility of the prostheses. In this study, we seek to evaluate the feasibility of a non-invasive transcutaneous nerve stimulation method in generating haptic feedback in a transradial amputee subject as well as intact able-bodied subjects. APPROACH An electrode grid was placed on the skin along the medial side of the upper arm beneath the short head of the biceps brachii, in proximity to the median and ulnar nerves. Varying stimulation patterns were delivered to different electrode pairs, in order to emulate different types of sensations (Single Tap, Press-and-Hold, Double Tap) at different regions of the hand. Subjects then reported the magnitude of sensation by pressing on a force transducer to transform the qualitative haptic perception into a quantitative measurement. MAIN RESULTS Altering current stimulations through electrode pairs on the grid resulted in repeatable alterations in the percept regions of the hand. Most subjects reported spatial coverage of individual fingers or phalanges, which can resemble the whole hand through different pairs of stimulation electrodes. The different stimulation patterns were also differentiable by all subjects. The amputee subject also reported haptic sensations similar to the able-bodied subjects. SIGNIFICANCE Our findings demonstrated the capabilities of our transcutaneous stimulation method. Subjects were able to perceive spatially distinct sensations with graded magnitudes that emulated tapping and holding sensation in their hands. The elicitation of haptic sensations in the phantom hand of an amputee is a significant step in the development of our stimulation method, and provides insight into the future adaptation and implementation of prostheses with non-invasive sensory feedback to the users.

[1]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  Key considerations in designing a somatosensory neuroprosthesis , 2016, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[2]  Peter König,et al.  Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent? , 2017, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[3]  T. A. Rohland Sensory feedback for powered limb prostheses , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[4]  Dustin J. Tyler,et al.  Stability and selectivity of a chronic, multi-contact cuff electrode for sensory stimulation in human amputees , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[5]  S. Vijayakumar,et al.  The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  G A Clark,et al.  The foreign body response to the Utah Slant Electrode Array in the cat sciatic nerve. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Comparison of remote pressure and vibrotactile feedback for prosthetic hand control , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[8]  P. Dijkstra,et al.  Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study , 2000, Pain.

[9]  Thierry Keller,et al.  Sensor fusion and computer vision for context-aware control of a multi degree-of-freedom prosthesis , 2016 .

[10]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation , 2009 .

[11]  B. Rosén,et al.  Artificial Sensibility Based on the Use of Piezoresistive Sensors , 1998, Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[15]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[16]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  A Miniature Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Device for Multifingered Hand Prosthetics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  G A Clark,et al.  Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Haptic characteristics of some activities of daily living , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[21]  C. Antfolk,et al.  Artificial Redirection of Sensation From Prosthetic Fingers to the Phantom Hand Map on Transradial Amputees: Vibrotactile Versus Mechanotactile Sensory Feedback , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Florian Solzbacher,et al.  Long term in vitro functional stability and recording longevity of fully integrated wireless neural interfaces based on the Utah Slant Electrode Array , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  J. F. Dammann,et al.  The Neural Coding of Stimulus Intensity: Linking the Population Response of Mechanoreceptive Afferents with Psychophysical Behavior , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Dario Farina,et al.  Multichannel electrotactile feedback for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Developing Non-Somatotopic Phantom Finger Sensation to Comparable Levels of Somatotopic Sensation through User Training With Electrotactile Stimulation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Stephen T. Foldes,et al.  Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[27]  Dustin J Tyler,et al.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis. , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[28]  Guohong Chai,et al.  Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[30]  S. Micera,et al.  Intrafascicular thin-film multichannel electrodes for sensory feedback: Evidences on a human amputee , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[31]  Xiangyang Zhu,et al.  Somatotopical feedback versus non-somatotopical feedback for phantom digit sensation on amputees using electrotactile stimulation , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  G.S. Dhillon,et al.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[33]  S C Jacobsen,et al.  Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A somatotopic bidirectional hand prosthesis with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation based sensory feedback , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[36]  L. Miller,et al.  Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.